http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> --- GCC uses the line number of the start of the asm statement, so line 8 is correct.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> --- GCC uses the line number of the start of the asm statement, so line 8 is correct.