http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56671
Bug #: 56671
Summary: Gcc uses large amounts of memory and processor power
with large C++11 bitsets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56434
--- Comment #7 from Chip Salzenberg 2013-03-21 00:31:40
UTC ---
So ... is there still a question of the Right Thing here? It seems that fixing
MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT for the world, and ensuring that BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT never
affects the ABI,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2013-03-20
22:00:26 UTC ---
> Must have been a recent fix, cos it failed with gcc version 4.8.0 20130309
> (experimental) [trunk revision 196573] (GCC)!
Sort of, we now disable the front-end assertions o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Bug #: 56670
Summary: Allocatable-length character var causes bogus warning
with -Wall
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org 2013-03-20 17:24:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Confirmed on mainline, but this will compile with the 4.8.0 release.
So it will (with gcc version 4.8.0 20130320 (prerelease) [gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51304
--- Comment #4 from Antoine Poliakov 2013-03-20
16:52:35 UTC ---
Yes, I also submitted the bug (15551) to clang. Doesn't seem to kill intel's
icc though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51304
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-20
16:22:26 UTC ---
And indeed, I can confirm that the problem is the stack. Likewise happens with
clang++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56355
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-20 16:19:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Jeff Law mentions that it would be good to add this "squares are nonnegative"
> information to VRP, not just tree_binary_nonnegative_warnv_p.
> http://
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51304
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoinep92 at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56355
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-20 15:40:30
UTC ---
Jeff Law mentions that it would be good to add this "squares are nonnegative"
information to VRP, not just tree_binary_nonnegative_warnv_p.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
--- Comment #3 from GS 2013-03-20 15:07:00 UTC
---
What about warning? Would it be like harmful, or what?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
--- Comment #1 from Antoine Poliakov 2013-03-20
14:46:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 29702
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29702
error message from 4.8.0 with stack trace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56669
Bug #: 56669
Summary: Short code causes segfault with large -ftemplate-depth
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56305
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-20
14:42:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It seems to be invalid Fortran 2003 but valid Fortran 2008
> Fortran 2003 has ("15.1.2.5 C LOC (X)"):
> "Argument. X shall either
> (1) have inte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56655
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Associate construct with|[F03] ASSOCIATE construc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56668
Bug #: 56668
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr56494.c: ICE in simplify_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:5725
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-03-20
13:28:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 20 13:26:19 2013
New Revision: 196825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196825&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-03-20 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56655
--- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend 2013-03-20
13:25:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Created attachment 29692 [details]
> > Test source file to reproduce the error
> >
> > Attempting to compile the atta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #12 from Rich Townsend 2013-03-20
12:56:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> So I guess an important question is if the "svn-fetched 4.8.0" wasn't actually
> "svn-fetched trunk" instead, Uros' changes have been committed only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
Bug #: 56667
Summary: Syntax error causes misleading message: "Expected
PARAMETER symbol in complex constant"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug #: 5
Summary: Suppression flag for " DO loop at (1) will be executed
zero times"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56646
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56664
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
--- Comment #1 from Bogdan 2013-03-20 11:50:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29700
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29700
preprocessor output + log + test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56665
Bug #: 56665
Summary: -O2 with -fno-strict-aliasing makes
boost::spirit::classic::assign_a not working
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-20
11:39:31 UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Mar 20 11:34:56 2013
New Revision: 196821
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196821&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't XFAIL gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 (PR fortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener 2013-03-20
11:16:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 20 11:08:52 2013
New Revision: 196820
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-03-20 Jack Howarth
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener 2013-03-20
11:16:14 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 20 11:06:35 2013
New Revision: 196819
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-03-20 Jack Howarth
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56664
Bug #: 56664
Summary: internal compiler error: in
estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline.c:1940
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #54 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-03-20
11:05:58 UTC ---
Status update:
Although gnat is solid enough to rebuild itself with (patched) gcc-4.6 on m68k,
there is a regression with (similarly patched) 4.7 that breaks bootstrap:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Bernhard.Rosenkranzer at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56662
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56663
Bug #: 56663
Summary: [PATCH] docs can't be built with texinfo 5.x
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56644
--- Comment #4 from Rolf Ebert 2013-03-20
10:23:43 UTC ---
I used the release candidate 4.8.0 from 2013-03-16 (see initial problem
description)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler
2013-03-20 10:19:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I tested gcc 4.8.0 20130310 (experimental)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56662
Bug #: 56662
Summary: ICE in gcc.dg/vect/vect-outer-5.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-20
09:48:46 UTC ---
Actualy I think the clang guys tried to implement the standard, like the gcc
guys.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56655
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-03-20
09:43:46 UTC ---
(friendly note to Daniel: "gcc 4.8.0 trunk" doesn't make much sense ;) Either
you mean trunk (future 4.9) or the recently created gcc-4_8-branch branch, from
which 4.8.0 will be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53323
--- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org 2013-03-20 09:36:44 UTC ---
Still fails on 4.8.
However: package Indefinite_Dynamic begins
generic
type Item (<>) is private;
type Item_Ptr is access Item;
Storage
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |4.9.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2013-03-20 09:29:13
UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Mar 20 09:23:39 2013
New Revision: 196813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/56656
* config/i386/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56657
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-03-20
09:07:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29698
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29698
reduced test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56661
Bug #: 56661
Summary: [4.8 regression] Incorrect code with -O1 -ftree-pre
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56657
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-20
08:42:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 20 08:40:08 2013
New Revision: 196808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/56635
* tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56636
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-20
08:15:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29697
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29697
assembly with -dp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-20
08:14:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 29696
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29696
preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48618
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48618
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53325
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Huber
2013-03-20 08:09:50 UTC ---
It is also fixed in the GCC 4.6 and 4.7 branches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2013-03-20 07:45:22
UTC ---
This is probably fallout from move pattern unification. Can you please attach
preprocessed source and assembly? Please use -dp when compiling, it will
generate corresponding insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56660
Bug #: 56660
Summary: Fails to read NAMELIST with certain form array syntax
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659
Bug #: 56659
Summary: Segfault due to missing libcpp error handler for
"gfortran -cpp"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658
Bug #: 56658
Summary: Silent conversion between 'char' and 'int' even though
there are 'signed char' and 'unsigned char'
alternatives
Classification: Unclassified
77 matches
Mail list logo
