http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263
--- Comment #5 from demiurg_spb at freemail dot ru 2013-02-20 05:53:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> >
>
> It's a shortcoming in the Embedded C paper and I agree with you that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56259
--- Comment #3 from Caleb Sunstrum 2013-02-20
01:47:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This block of code was added to handle a special case seen on FreeBSD:
> (a) on some versions of FreeBSD circa 2004, the system installed copy of gmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29465|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54517
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 only] wrong|wrong inlining of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56404
--- Comment #2 from argentinator.gcc.questions at outlook dot com 2013-02-20
00:21:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Report this to the mingw folks since they are the ones who provide
> fpclassify.
> That is they provide the header fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54517
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56404
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56404
Bug #: 56404
Summary: About fpclassify and standard C99
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780
--- Comment #5 from Janis Johnson 2013-02-19
23:53:05 UTC ---
The gcc.target/arm/ftest-*.c tests now work without hangs, but the effective
target checks are still in the testsuite available to be used by other tests
where they will show th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56091
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56115
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56395
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
23:32:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 29505
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29505
pr56395.ii
Somewhat reduced testcase (after 9 hours of delta, still > 20KB).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #51 from Janne Blomqvist 2013-02-19
22:48:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Revision 180701 removed all checks for special files in
> unit.c:unit_truncate().
> As a consequence programs compiled with gfortran 4.6.3 and ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56402
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|gonz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
Bug #: 56403
Summary: internal compiler error: in build_zero_init_1, at
cp/init.c:279
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56402
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-19
22:10:22 UTC ---
*** Bug 56401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56401
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56400
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56402
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-19
22:08:53 UTC ---
*** Bug 56400 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
--- Comment #7 from argentinator.gcc.questions at outlook dot com 2013-02-19
22:01:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, argentinator.gcc.questions at outlook dot com wrote:
>
> > I tried to print the value of fpclass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #6 from Jay 2013-02-19 21:52:31 UTC
---
> should pass op0 and op1 to the fold_build2_loc call, instead of arg0/arg1
I don't disagree, but I really I don't know.
Clearly that means almost but not exactly the same thing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-02-19 21:51:56 UTC ---
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, argentinator.gcc.questions at outlook dot com wrote:
> I tried to print the value of fpclassify for a 'subnormal' value whose type is
> 'f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56379
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
21:50:14 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 21:50:10 2013
New Revision: 196155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196155
Log:
PR libquadmath/56379
* strtod/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56265
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2013-02-19 21:09:54 UTC
---
>
Hi,
the patch seems to work well for Mozilla. There are two issues I noticed while
testing it
1) we now enable-checking ICE on cgraph_mark_address_taken when compiling
Moz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56402
--- Comment #1 from gnzlbg 2013-02-19 20:52:55
UTC ---
To get the program to compile one has to comment out the second lambda which
makes the compiler crash.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56401
--- Comment #1 from gnzlbg 2013-02-19 20:50:19
UTC ---
Please delete, the report was submitted multiple times accidentaly (the right
one is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56402).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56400
--- Comment #1 from gnzlbg 2013-02-19 20:50:10
UTC ---
Please delete, the report was submitted multiple times accidentaly (the right
one is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56402).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56401
Bug #: 56401
Summary: Lambda's this pointer are not initialized inside
template classes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56402
Bug #: 56402
Summary: Lambda's this pointer are not initialized inside
template classes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56400
Bug #: 56400
Summary: Lambda's this pointer are not initialized inside
template classes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54243
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-04 08:03:18 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 4 08:03:09 2012
New Revision: 190910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190910
Log:
2012-09-04 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53532
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-12
21:16:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 12 21:16:20 2012
New Revision: 188483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188483
Log:
PR c/53532
PR c/51034
PR c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53470
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-20
07:22:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 20 07:22:07 2012
New Revision: 188811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188811
Log:
2012-06-11 Richard Guenther
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53196
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-12
21:16:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 12 21:16:20 2012
New Revision: 188483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188483
Log:
PR c/53532
PR c/51034
PR c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
Evgeniy Stepanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eugeni.stepanov at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52719
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener 2012-06-04
08:43:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 08:43:23 2012
New Revision: 188167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188167
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener 2012-06-04
08:43:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 4 08:43:23 2012
New Revision: 188167
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188167
Log:
2012-06-04 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51034
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-12
21:16:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 12 21:16:20 2012
New Revision: 188483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188483
Log:
PR c/53532
PR c/51034
PR c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
--- Comment #10 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 06:58:32 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Jun 8 06:58:25 2012
New Revision: 188327
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188327
Log:
Backport mainline r179607, r1799
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #11 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 06:58:33 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Jun 8 06:58:25 2012
New Revision: 188327
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188327
Log:
Backport mainline r179607, r1799
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32927
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-10
13:54:22 UTC ---
Perhaps you could add an entry to the FAQ: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ so when
people google for the error, they understand what the problem is. The FAQ
should also mention this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56396
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
19:09:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 29500
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29500
gcc48-pr56396.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56396
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
--- Comment #5 from argentinator.gcc.questions at outlook dot com 2013-02-19
18:58:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This looks like it's just an issue with the diagnostic text
> (binary_op_error being called with the type in which the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-19
18:24:55 UTC ---
Or just stop typing 'float' and type 'double' instead.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
--- Comment #5 from johnfoxrep at yahoo dot com 2013-02-19 18:08:54 UTC ---
I think float should be a thing of the past as the CPU should be able to
process double as fast as float today. Using double by default would prevent
hard to find bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-02-19
17:58:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
>> This cannot work because ISO/IEC TR18037 forces these literals into generic
>> space.
>>
>
> ISO/IEC TR18037
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:50:16 UTC ---
Your expectations are wrong then. Size and format of float is part of ABI, so
can't be changed just because somebody has bad expectations, furthermore, for
many uses IEEE 754 s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
johnfoxrep at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
johnfoxrep at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] parse |[4.6 Regression] parse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56237
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56217
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56350
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:30:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:30:27 2013
New Revision: 196150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196150
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56381
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:28:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:28:11 2013
New Revision: 196149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196149
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56245
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:27:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:26:56 2013
New Revision: 196148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196148
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56250
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:26:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:26:04 2013
New Revision: 196147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196147
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56241
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:24:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:24:37 2013
New Revision: 196146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196146
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56239
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:22:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:22:43 2013
New Revision: 196145
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196145
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56237
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:21:14 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:21:08 2013
New Revision: 196142
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196142
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56217
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:19:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:19:36 2013
New Revision: 196141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196141
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55110
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
17:16:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:15:53 2013
New Revision: 196140
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196140
Log:
Backported from mainline
2012-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-02-19 17:10:46 UTC ---
This looks like it's just an issue with the diagnostic text
(binary_op_error being called with the type in which the floating-point
operand is being represente
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-*-mingw32
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56399
Bug #: 56399
Summary: Adding int to float generates incorrect results
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
--- Comment #2 from argentinator.gcc.questions at outlook dot com 2013-02-19
16:56:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I get the expected result with 4.7.2 on MinGW and with all versions on
> GNU/Linux
I have reinstalled MinGW in my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56368
--- Comment #1 from Karlson2k 2013-02-19 16:41:03 UTC ---
Looks like confusing naming.
'objdir' in 'configure' means 'relative path to directory for objects files',
usually '.libs'.
'objdir' in makefile means 'absolute path to main build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
16:23:03 UTC ---
At least from what is described in that PR, it would look like it is just fine
to use EXACT_DIV_EXPR, but that we should pass op0 and op1 to the
fold_build2_loc call, instead of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56363
--- Comment #4 from Jay 2013-02-19 16:18:02 UTC
---
ah, here is more info; I reported the bug better years ago but it was never
looked at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46679
There I don't claim bad code, but a failu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56392
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-19
15:52:31 UTC ---
Any code containing reinterpret_cast should serve as a warning!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #5 from Takaki Makino
2013-02-19 15:26:41 UTC ---
To reply Kostya's comment,
As shown in the reduced testcase, the program crashes before
ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=1 takes effect.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56392
Jonas Wielicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||org.gnu.gcc.bugtracker at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #4 from Takaki Makino
2013-02-19 15:22:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29499
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29499
reduced testcase
I tried to made a fairly reduced testcase from boost.
Attached please fin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56385
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-19
15:12:56 UTC ---
I get the expected result with 4.7.2 on MinGW and with all versions on
GNU/Linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56395
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-19
15:05:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Happens in insn-preds.c quite often:
>
> case 'Y':
> if (!strncmp (str, "Yi", 2))
> return CONSTRAINT_Yi;
> if (!strncmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56398
Bug #: 56398
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE (Segmentation fault) in
dominated_by_p
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-02-19
14:50:52 UTC ---
Happens in insn-preds.c quite often:
case 'Y':
if (!strncmp (str, "Yi", 2))
return CONSTRAINT_Yi;
if (!strncmp (str, "Ym", 2))
return CONST
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-19
14:48:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 29497
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29497
Patch to fix at least part of the problem
This patch fixes Jakub's testcase and the one pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56397
Bug #: 56397
Summary: Floating Point constant in C, with standard C99
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56396
Bug #: 56396
Summary: [4.8 Regression] memory corruption in cc1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56394
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Yegorushkin
2013-02-19 14:31:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > > Also reproduces with optimization but with -fno-inl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56395
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo