http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55560
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55560
Bug #: 55560
Summary: fesetround(FE_DOWNWARD) causes cos() to return values
outside the range of -1 to +1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #146 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-02 07:36:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #145)
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
> >
> > --- Comment #144 from Markus Trippelsdorf
> > 2012-12-01 12:39:30 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-02
05:38:09 UTC ---
Using mac function interposition on x86_64-apple-darwin12 produces only 8
remaining g++ testsuite failures emitting ASAN:SIGSEGV messages compared to 10
seen in the g++ testsuit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-02
02:57:46 UTC ---
Patch to switch libsanitizer on darwin from mach_override to mac interpose
functions submitted to gcc-patches at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00055.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28849|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-01
23:50:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28850
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28850
revised preliminary mac function interpose patch
Add missing removal of usage of USING_MACH
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28847|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
--- Comment #10 from Gary Funck 2012-12-01 23:17:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> OK, I applied it to our autotester and we will see tomorrow if it fixes the
> segfaults.
> If so, can I go ahead and commit it?
>
> Honza
Ping: w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Bug #: 9
Summary: Marshalling double through union with inlines,
incorrect behavior with -O2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-01 22:52:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Dec 1 22:52:27 2012
New Revision: 194036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194036
Log:
2012-12-01 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44551
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-01 22:22:28
UTC ---
Also see PR 44551.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pashev.igor at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #145 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-01 22:09:07
UTC ---
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
>
> --- Comment #144 from Markus Trippelsdorf
> 2012-12-01 12:39:30 UTC ---
> It looks like there is a LTO code-size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #3 from Paol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
--- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-01
21:42:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 28847 [details]
> mockup patch for switching darwin to mac function interpose
This patch bootstraps gcc trunk to build libasan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #33 from David Edelsohn 2012-12-01
21:42:10 UTC ---
You cannot ask legal questions and expect to receive an answer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-01
21:37:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 28847
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28847
mockup patch for switching darwin to mac function interpose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #2 from Alfred Krohmer 2012-12-01 21:18:00
UTC ---
Well, this is awkward, not even a template class is needed, the following code
also produces the bug:
struct A
{
static int member;
};
template void foobar ()
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #1 from Alfred Krohmer 2012-12-01 20:57:57
UTC ---
Just figured out that the class does not need to be specialized in order to
reproduce the bug, so the member variable could also be declared in the
unspecialized class.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55544
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-12-01 20:53:02 UTC ---
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012, joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de wrote:
> I see no reference to -fexcess-precision=standard in (garbage sink) bug 323,
> do
> you? So IMHO this is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Bug #: 8
Summary: [C++11] decltype on a static member variable of a
specialized class in a template function results in an
internal compiler error
Classification: Uncla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Comment #1 from Igor Pashev 2012-12-01
20:46:12 UTC ---
# g++-4.7 --version
g++-4.7 (Debian 4.7.2-4) 4.7.2
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Bug #: 7
Summary: g++ 4.7 does not issue a warning on the first auto_ptr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #18 from John David Anglin 2012-12-01
20:36:08 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Dec 1 20:36:04 2012
New Revision: 194027
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194027
Log:
Backport from mainline:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin 2012-12-01
20:17:22 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Dec 1 20:17:13 2012
New Revision: 194026
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194026
Log:
PR middle-end/52450
* gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-01
19:50:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 28846
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28846
Use subreg
Hmm, I don't understand why we use UNSPEC_CAST. I tried the attached patch to
us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572
--- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-12-01
19:48:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Thanks for the additional info.
>
> #1 0x77bb53be in build_address_map (addrs=0x7fffc710,
> data=0x7fffcf1c,
> error_cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2012-12-01
19:45:29 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Dec 1 19:45:24 2012
New Revision: 194025
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194025
Log:
PR ada/52110
* s-osinte-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin 2012-12-01
19:43:08 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Dec 1 19:43:04 2012
New Revision: 194024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194024
Log:
PR ada/52110
* s-osinte-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55503
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55470
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Enable both ld and gold in |Support -fuse-ld=bfd and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55503
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-12-01
19:20:45 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Dec 1 19:20:39 2012
New Revision: 194023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194023
Log:
PR libstdc++/55503
* test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55503
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-12-01
18:25:21 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Dec 1 18:25:11 2012
New Revision: 194021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194021
Log:
PR libstdc++/55503
* test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50713
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-12-01 17:49:00 UTC ---
indeed.
and now this other vectorizes also on corei7 ("yesterday" was ok only with AVX)
float64x4_t cross_product(float64x4_t x, float64x4_t y) {
// yz - zy, zx - xz, xy - yx,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50713
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-01 16:54:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
We seem to do better now. I see essentially the same code for the vector and
loop versions. The main issue left is for dfma8*, copying the result to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug #: 6
Summary: gcc/exec-tool.in isn't parallel build safe in combined
tree
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #9 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-01
16:38:25 UTC ---
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:01 AM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
>
> --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf
> 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53860
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-01
16:10:44 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 1 16:10:30 2012
New Revision: 194019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194019
Log:
Fix a typo in PR debug/53860 Chan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
uns fine at -O1.
To reproduce
gfortran -O2 bug.f90 ; ./a.out
#3 0x400C7E in MAIN__ at bug.f90:97
Aborted
I believe this is a recent regression on trunk. Tested with
gcc version 4.8.0 20121201 (experimental) [trunk revision 194017] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Alexander S changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #1 from Alexander S 2012-12-01
14:30:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 28844
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28844
Preprocessed output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Bug #: 4
Summary: GCC generates illegal instruction for optimization
level >=O1 when invoking casted pointer to function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-01
13:54:49 UTC ---
Or just say asan isn't supported on darwin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #144 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-01 12:39:30 UTC ---
It looks like there is a LTO code-size regression on trunk:
(size of libxul.so, build without elfhack):
gcc lto/pgo : size: 42204584 | Kraken bench: 2723.9ms +/- 0.9%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51589
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30609
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55548
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55544
--- Comment #7 from Jörg Richter 2012-12-01 09:53:13
UTC ---
I see no reference to -fexcess-precision=standard in (garbage sink) bug 323, do
you? So IMHO this is not a dup.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-01 09:01:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> Index: lto-cgraph.c
> ===
> --- lto-cgraph.c(revision 193999)
> ++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45216
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-01 08:51:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> unsigned long rotate_left(unsigned long a, unsigned int shift)
> {
> return a << shift | a >> (sizeof(a) * 8 - shift);
> }
We have a regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52110
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.3.1 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46897
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2012-12-01 08:00:32
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Dec 1 08:00:22 2012
New Revision: 194016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194016
Log:
2012-12-01 Alessandro Fanfarillo
67 matches
Mail list logo