http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55320
Bug #: 55320
Summary: Invalid delete with throwing copy-c'tor passed to
std::function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55319
Bug #: 55319
Summary: Using -fwhole-program inhibits optimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55318
Bug #: 55318
Summary: Missing uninitialized warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-14
01:30:13 UTC ---
Revised patch builds at r193494 after...
cd libsanitizer
autoconf -I. -I../config
automake-1.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28677|0 |1
is obsolete|
ndefined
lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.8.0 20121113 (experimental) (GCC)
Use --enable-stdcall-fixup to disable these warnings
Use --disable-stdcall-fixup to disable these fixups
/tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/crtbegin.o:cygming-crtbegin.c:(.text+0x2f):
u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-14
00:02:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Nov 14 00:02:12 2012
New Revision: 193491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193491
Log:
Update configure.ac for GCC tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |ada
--- Comment #4 from Geor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55316
Bug #: 55316
Summary: gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_linux.cc:70:3: error:
#error "Unsupported arch"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-13
23:38:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 28673 [details]
> gcc48-pr43631.patch
>
> Is this what you meant?
Yes, that's exactly what I meant, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-13
23:37:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28678
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28678
Gross hack
(In reply to comment #11)
> If loops are still around at LRA time, perhaps L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-11-13 23:21:35 UTC ---
> prototype patch for adding darwin asan support
Already updated;-(
- x86_64-*-linux-* | i?86-*-linux-*)
+ x86_64-*-linux-* | i?86-*-linux-* | *-*-darwin*)
s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2012-11-13
22:59:22 UTC ---
Here's a tentative patch:
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (Revision 192894)
+++ resolve.c (Arbeitskopi
-gnu/usr
--with-libelf=obj/pkg-mainline-0-mipsisa32r2-sde-elf/fsf-mainline-0-mipsisa32r2-sde-elf.extras/host-libs-i686-pc-linux-gnu/usr
--disable-libgomp --disable-libitm --enable-poison-system-directories
--with-build-time-tools=install/mipsisa32r2-sde-elf/bin
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.8.0 20121113 (experimental) (GCC)
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314
Bug #: 55314
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE
statements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-13 22:25:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I've tested this:
>
> Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c
> ===
> --- gcc/config/sh/sh.c(rev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-13
22:14:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Created attachment 28677 [details]
> prototype patch for adding darwin asan support
Note that you need to run...
autoconf -I. -I./config
cd li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28676|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-11-13 21:31:08 UTC ---
gcc uses "-O2 -g" by default for --disable-bootstrap.
Also ,to be fair, if one uses a profiledbootstrapped gcc configured with
--enable-checking=release to build it only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Konstantin Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||konstantin.s.serebryany at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13
21:25:45 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Nov 13 21:25:39 2012
New Revision: 193485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193485
Log:
PR other/55312
* configu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
Konstantin Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||konstantin.s.serebryany at
mach_override: some instructions unknown! Need to update mach_override.c
err = f801
../../../../gcc-4.8-20121113/libsanitizer/interception/mach_override/mach_override.c:308
err = f801
../../../../gcc-4.8-20121113/libsanitizer/interception/mach_override/mach_override.c:321
err = f801
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299
--- Comment #2 from olly at survex dot com 2012-11-13 20:40:06 UTC ---
Interestingly clang (at least 3.0-6 from Debian testing) fails to optimise the
same testcase but shifting by a constant. For that variant case clang
generates essentiall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-13
20:25:45 UTC ---
Also note the comment in mach_override.c...
#elif defined(__x86_64__)
// TODO(glider): disassembling the "0x48, 0x89" sequences is trickier than it's
done below.
// If it st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-13
20:21:35 UTC ---
The disasembled testcase that is choking on shows...
test.o: file format mach-o-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
<_main>:
0:55
Matching: 48 FAIL
Matching: 48 FAIL
Matching: 48 FAIL
Matching: 48 FAIL
Matching: 48 FAIL
Matching: 48 FAIL
Matching: 48 FAIL
Matching: 48 8d FAIL
mach_override: some instructions unknown! Need to update mach_override.c
overridePossible = false @299
err = f801
../../
piled with...
g++-fsf-4.8 -faddress-sanitizer -framework CoreFoundation hello.cc -lasan
produce...
# ./a.out
mach_override: some instructions unknown! Need to update mach_override.c
err = f801
../../../../gcc-4.8-20121113/libsanitizer/interception/mach_override/mach_override.c:308
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-13
19:50:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28676
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28676
hack to build asan support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2012-11-13
18:56:27 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Nov 13 18:56:24 2012
New Revision: 193484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193484
Log:
2012-11-13 Martin Jambor
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-11-13 18:54:40 UTC ---
> Dup of PR53346 ?
May be! Both PRs seem also related to pr54073.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53342
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-13 18:46:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yeah.
Is there any progress on this issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41115
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||venkataramanan.kumar at amd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-13 18:39:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> This shows that the file cptrf2_inl_1.f90 compiled with -ftree-loop-if-convert
> gives a slow executable without involving inlining or vectorization.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #36 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13
18:35:42 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 13 18:35:32 2012
New Revision: 193483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193483
Log:
Workaround PR middle-end/55142
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #35 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-13 18:21:30
UTC ---
This regression is triggered by revision 188008:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00038.html
aka the un-sign-extension of sizetype constants.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Juno Krahn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juno.krahn at nih dot gov
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 16:59:44 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Nov 13 16:59:37 2012
New Revision: 193480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193480
Log:
PR target/41993
* mode-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
--- Comment #6 from Valery Weber 2012-11-13
16:57:28 UTC ---
Dear All
I posted a comment on the openmp forum about the f2003 features. Complaining
there may help, who knows?
Valery
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54466
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-11-13
16:07:50 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Nov 13 16:07:39 2012
New Revision: 193479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193479
Log:
PR c++/54466 - ICE with alias template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54818
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-13
15:24:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Please see PR53346, from comment 14 onwards, especially H.J.'s comment:
>
> -quote-
> I was told that cmov wins if branch is mispredicted, otherw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073
--- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-13 15:13:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The attached proof of concept patch attempts to just restore the 4.6 and
> earlier behavior by allowing in all comparisons. Of course perhaps it mig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073
--- Comment #9 from Artem S. Tashkinov 2012-11-13
15:06:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The attached proof of concept patch attempts to just restore the 4.6 and
> earlier behavior by allowing in all comparisons. Of course perhaps it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55307
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-13
14:39:00 UTC ---
Iain,
This brings up the sticky situation of having to modify the Makefile.am
file in libsanitizer/interception to add mach_override/mach_override.c to the
interception_file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313
Bug #: 55313
Summary: libsanitizer cannot be installed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2012-11-13
14:31:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28675
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28675
Fix
I am currently bootstrapping this fix. I'll submit it to the mailing list if
all goes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-13
14:29:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > what you need is to have "-framework CoreFoundation" on the link line - and
> > I
> > guess the configury &c. needs to arrange this.
>
> When co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55305
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55312
Bug #: 55312
Summary: libbacktrace doesn't honor --disable-werror
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #33 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-13
14:17:03 UTC ---
> Can we limit
>
> (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y)))
>
> to
>
> (plus:DI (zero_extend:DI (FOO:SI)) (const_int Y))
>
> transformation to Y > TARGET SPE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311
Bug #: 55311
Summary: Cannot specialize template parameter of type 'const
char *const' in 'using' alias
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-11-13
14:10:36 UTC ---
> what you need is to have "-framework CoreFoundation" on the link line - and I
> guess the configury &c. needs to arrange this.
When compiled with -faddress-sanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #23 from Adi 2012-11-13 14:08:42 UTC
---
I did not put the patch yet.
This is just gcc 4.7.2 original sources. Why would they not compile?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-13
14:06:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > dyld: Symbol not found: _CFStringCreateCopy
>
> this is found in the CoreFoundation framework (CFx is a good hint
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn 2012-11-13
14:02:48 UTC ---
The patch in PR 33704 makes no changes to libstdc++ or to any GCC , so I have
no idea why you are seeing C++ errors compiling c-lang.c. Something else was
modified.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2012-11-13 13:54:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > You can find these files in..
> >
> > http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/branches/release_32/lib/interception/mach_override/
>
> With th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-11-13
13:23:28 UTC ---
> You can find these files in..
>
> http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/branches/release_32/lib/interception/mach_override/
With this files I have been able t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55310
Bug #: 55310
Summary: libsanitizer con't be complier use gcc on windows
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-13
13:04:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 28674
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28674
gcc48-pr54073.patch
On x86_64-linux on SandyBridge CPU with -O3 -march=corei7-avx I've trac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54091
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-13 11:27:39
UTC ---
One problem is AM_PROG_LIBTOOL, which is the part of libtool.
GCC autoconf doesn't use libtool since we have in-tree
libtool. To use GCC autoconf, we need also use the rest of
libto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|ian
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-13
10:50:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 28673
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28673
gcc48-pr43631.patch
Is this what you meant? make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=guality.exp doesn'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-13
10:43:58 UTC ---
I think (plus (frame) (const_int)) is likely not an issue (at least in the
common case, could be only problem if eliminated into something that needs much
bigger offset that do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55266
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-13 10:23:03
UTC ---
The first copy is PR 52436.
The second copy has a patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00900.html
The last copy would require turning:
gimple_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55270
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309
Bug #: 55309
Summary: gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhanceme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-11-13
09:44:26 UTC ---
6.4MB in a single function is the problem.
The compiler has to process that entire function at once.
And 2GB is not a great amount.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-11-13
09:42:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> The end result of the long long experiment is that there is something wrong in
> gcc 4.7.2 that make it near impossible to bootstrap.
No,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308
Bug #: 55308
Summary: /usr/ports/lang/gcc48/work/build/sparc64-portbld-freeb
sd10.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6:
Undefined symbol "__emutls_v._ThreadRuneLocale"
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2012-11-13 08:44:43
UTC ---
I've tested this:
Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.c
===
--- gcc/config/sh/sh.c(revision 193423)
+++ gcc/config/sh/sh.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
--- Comment #4 from Gordon Cichon 2012-11-13
08:33:01 UTC ---
Why is GCC comsuming so much memory?
The program has 6.4MB source code, it is a single function. All optimizations
are turned off. And there is 2GB memory in the system.
We
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #21 from Adi 2012-11-13 08:29:51 UTC
---
I am trying to build gcc 4.7.2 in order to apply the patch you suggested.
I did the following:
-download the gcc 4.7.2
-unzip and untar to to the root directory.
mkdir /gcc-build
cd /
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54791
--- Comment #20 from Adi 2012-11-13 08:21:12 UTC
---
Created attachment 28672
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28672
the error while building gcc
the error while building gcc 4.7.2
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
