[Bug other/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

[konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309



Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com> changed:



           What    |Removed                     |Added

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 CC|                            |konstantin.s.serebryany at

                   |                            |gmail dot com



--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot 
com> 2012-11-13 21:10:23 UTC ---

While this is an interesting comparison, I should note that 

the typical use of asan is with -O1 or -O2, 

so it might make more sense to  compare the asan implementations at -O1/-O2