http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54426
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54426
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-02
06:40:32 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Sep 2 06:40:27 2012
New Revision: 190853
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190853
Log:
2012-09-02 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54454
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-02
02:05:47 UTC ---
I think this comes down to alignment.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54454
--- Comment #1 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz 2012-09-02 01:52:54
UTC ---
Another specification violation:
section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 20 says that assignment of a structure with flexible
array member doesn't copy any of the array ele
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54454
Bug #: 54454
Summary: gcc violates c99 specification w.r.t. flexible arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-01
22:47:21 UTC ---
> Dominique, can you perhaps prepare the test in a correct way for the
> testsuite?
I have tested a slightly reduced version
! { dg-do compile }
! { dg-options "-O1 -fschedul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52898
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-01 22:47:26
UTC ---
I had a closer look at what is going on with cbranchdi and cmpeqdi_t.
If cmpeqdi_t is enabled through the option -mcmpeqdi it will trigger the 'if
(TARGET_CMPEQDI_T)' code paths in expand_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-01 22:21:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I get the ICE with 4.4.6, but the code compiles with 4.5.3, 4.6.3, 4.7.1, and
> trunk and '-O1 -fschedule-insns'.
I propose we put the testcase in the testsu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42295
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-01
22:19:09 UTC ---
> All testcases compile OK for me with recent mainline.
For me too with 4.6.3, 4.7.1, and trunk. I get the ICE with 4.4.6 and 4.5.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-01
22:12:27 UTC ---
> Can someone please fix fortran in the testcase, so it will compile with gcc
> 4.8?
The mailer has split a line in two:
USE class_dummy_atom_kdtree_types, ONLY: dummy_atom_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54431
--- Comment #1 from m101010a at gmail dot com 2012-09-01 22:04:04 UTC ---
Gcc also doesn't crash if the lambda line is changed to
[this]{this->bar();}();
Although the resulting program does.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42295
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-01 21:25:35
UTC ---
All testcases compile OK for me with recent mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36680
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koeni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54436
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-01
19:09:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Sep 1 19:09:02 2012
New Revision: 190849
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190849
Log:
PR target/54436
* config/i386/i386.md (*mov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
--- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2012-09-01
17:36:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 28117
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28117
Revert a few Makefile.am regexps
This patch fixes things for me. Note the subtle change from ["tab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54453
Bug #: 54453
Summary: [4.8 Regression] r190783 breaks bootstrap on
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54445
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-01 16:59:20
UTC ---
I am testing this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md b/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
index c78384b..ee7ae49 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54415
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32219
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54445
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-01 14:53:44
UTC ---
This is due to the definition of x86_64_immediate_operand predicate, following
part:
case UNSPEC:
switch (XINT (op1, 1))
{
case UNSPEC_DTPOFF:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947
--- Comment #19 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-09-01 14:31:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> 4.4.6 fails, 4.5.x fails earlier in a different Bug 44959 ; 4.6.1 works so
> closing.
After editing config/bootstrap-debug.mk as in (
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46829
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-01 14:29:51 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Sep 1 14:29:45 2012
New Revision: 190847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190847
Log:
PR target/46829
PR target/46843
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54446
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-09-01 14:30:22
UTC ---
It has been fixed in GCC 4.7:
.cfi_startproc
vmovdqa(%rdi), %ymm0
vptest%ymm0, %ymm0
sete%al
ret
.cfi_endproc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46843
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-01 14:29:51 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat Sep 1 14:29:45 2012
New Revision: 190847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190847
Log:
PR target/46829
PR target/46843
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54443
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54449
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||polacek at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54443
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54435
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2012-09-01
13:15:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> May I ask why?
See e.g. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-02/msg00943.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
--- Comment #4 from Sergey Zolotarev 2012-09-01
12:43:52 UTC ---
> Also, __attribute__((naked)) for x86 will never be implemented.
May I ask why?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54452
Bug #: 54452
Summary: "no makeinfo case" in classpath/doc still fails when
makeinfo is not present
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
Bug #: 54451
Summary: c++11/random.cc build failure when
_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 is not defined in config.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #32 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-09-01 11:22:55 UTC ---
Went back to 4.5.0 and commenting out '#STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle' in
config/bootstrap-debug.mk have it going beyond stage2/3 comparison. So I don't
know how I managed to build 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2012-09-01
11:10:10 UTC ---
Also, __attribute__((naked)) for x86 will never be implemented.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||polacek at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
Sergey Zolotarev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Host|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
Bug #: 54450
Summary: Extended asm in global scope
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #9 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-09-01 09:41:08 UTC ---
"ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
>> Looks good, thanks. Please go ahead.
>
> Thanks. On which branch(es)?
Hmm, looks like this goes all the way back to 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-01 09:40:14
UTC ---
The code below seems to optimize v[0]-v[1] and v[1]+v[0]. It doesn't recognize
v[0]+v[1], but that would not be too hard to add I guess. Compared to the true
hadd insn, I removed the set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-01
09:21:19 UTC ---
> Looks good, thanks. Please go ahead.
Thanks. On which branch(es)?
> But how does SPARC do it? sparc_reorg starts:
>
> /* The only erratum we handle for now is that of the AT6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54449
Bug #: 54449
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(T,base) index domain
error, in will_be_nonconstant_expr_predicate at
ipa-inline-analysis.c:1853 with -O
-fno-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54448
Bug #: 54448
Summary: many failures with /sbin/loader: Error:
libstdc++.so.6: symbol "__pthread_mutex_init"
unresolved
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #7 from Thiago Macieira 2012-09-01 08:26:05
UTC ---
I posted the patches on Thursday, three patches because I found one more issue,
to both lists.
Will they be picked up from there and applied to the source tree?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #31 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-01
08:26:32 UTC ---
I don't think bootstrap-debug.mk cannot be used for alpha OSF.
configure checks to see if it is possible:
if echo "int f (void) { return 0; }" > conftest.c &&
${CC} -c con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
--- Comment #30 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-09-01 08:18:06 UTC ---
I commented out gcc-4.7.1/config/bootstrap-debug.mk :
#STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle
and 4.7.1 passed.
this seems likely the cause - -gtoogle was introduced in 4.5.x. I am going to
try
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369
--- Comment #7 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-09-01 08:16:23 UTC ---
"ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
>> Are you going to check this in on the mainline?
>
> Not without Richard's approval, so I've CCed him now.
Looks good, tha
51 matches
Mail list logo
