[Bug target/54371] [4.8 Regression] jump tables are broken on n64 mips64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54371 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips*64-linux-gnu |mips64-linux-gnu Component|middl

[Bug middle-end/54371] [4.8 Regression] jump tables are broken on n64 mips64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54371 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression] a lot of |[4.8 Regression] jump |

[Bug middle-end/54371] [4.8 Regression] a lot of testcase failures on mips64-linux-gnu (soft-float) n64 only

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54371 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression] a lot of |[4.8 Regression] a lot of

[Bug middle-end/54371] [4.8 Regression] a lot of testcase failures on mips64-linux-gnu (soft-float)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54371 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug middle-end/54371] New: [4.8 Regression] a lot of testcase failures on mips64-linux-gnu (soft-float)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54371 Bug #: 54371 Summary: [4.8 Regression] a lot of testcase failures on mips64-linux-gnu (soft-float) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UN

[Bug c++/51213] [C++11][DR 1170] Access control checking has to be done under SFINAE conditions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2012-08-25 03:30:16 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Aug 25 03:30:11 2012 New Revision: 190664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190664 Log: PR c++/51213 (again) * pt.c (deduction_tsu

[Bug target/28896] -fstack-limit-symbol and m68k and non 68020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896 Larry Baker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27998|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/28896] -fstack-limit-symbol and m68k and non 68020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896 --- Comment #19 from Larry Baker 2012-08-25 00:28:56 UTC --- I plan to start testing my patches on a ColdFire uClinux system on Monday. In the mean time, I am unsure whether my code is correct for the -fPIC -mno-sep-data case. I do not know if

[Bug fortran/54370] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54370 --- Comment #1 from Kirill Chilikin 2012-08-24 21:51:19 UTC --- Created attachment 28080 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28080 testcase

[Bug fortran/54370] New: error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54370 Bug #: 54370 Summary: error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/54363] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling malformed struct initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-24 21:46:24 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 24 21:46:17 2012 New Revision: 190657 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190657 Log: PR c/54363 * gimplify.c (optimize_compound_

[Bug c/54355] ICE on invalid code in switch statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54355 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-24 21:45:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 24 21:45:22 2012 New Revision: 190656 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190656 Log: PR c/54355 * c-decl.c (c_parser_label): Pas

[Bug c++/51421] [c++0x] ICE with invalid use of auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51421 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/50921] GCC cannot find dependent conversion-function-id even if there's a using declaration for it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50921 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/49931] bug when use named operators

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49931 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54365] ARM optimization bug when pointer arithmetic wraps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54365] ARM optimization bug when pointer arithmetic wraps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365 --- Comment #2 from Greg Law 2012-08-24 18:38:24 UTC --- Yes, I think you're right: I hadn't appreciated that. Still, even though it's undefined, it's slightly strange behaviour for the compiler to adopt. I guess it's reasonable to close this bu

[Bug rtl-optimization/54365] ARM optimization bug when pointer arithmetic wraps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-24 18:23:50 UTC --- This code as far as I Know is undefined. Pointer arithmetic overflow is undefined and not wrapping. Mainly because there is no way to add a positive number to an object and get back

[Bug rtl-optimization/54369] New: Delayed-branch pass in reorg.c removes too many instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369 Bug #: 54369 Summary: Delayed-branch pass in reorg.c removes too many instructions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51661] ICE when template class list repeated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51661 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/51660] ICE on function missing argument list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51660 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52990] bootstrap ia64 cross-compiler gcc (static C-only) includes a broken libgcc.a due to libunwind dependencies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52990 --- Comment #2 from Mike Frysinger 2012-08-24 15:41:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) yes, the "build-programs = no" hack is also what i do. from my tests in the past, the cross-compiler produced usable executables. note, there is an ia64 si

[Bug c++/54368] [c++0x] Internal error when passing an identifier in static_assert instead of string-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54368 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54368] [c++0x] Internal error when passing an identifier in static_assert instead of string-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54368 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-24 14:08:16 UTC --- works fine with 4.7.1 or 4.8 20120819

[Bug c++/52597] [C++11] confusing diagnostics for invalid use of non-static member function in decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52597 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid,|diagnostic |rejects-v

[Bug c++/54198] [4.8 Regression] "error: invalid use of incomplete type" when building Chromium

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF

[Bug fortran/25708] Module loading is not good at all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40958 --- Comment #21 from Joost Van

[Bug c++/54368] New: [c++0x] Internal error when passing an identifier in static_assert instead of string-literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54368 Bug #: 54368 Summary: [c++0x] Internal error when passing an identifier in static_assert instead of string-literal Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug debug/52857] DW_OP_GNU_regval_type is generated with INVALID_REGNUM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 --- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-24 13:22:02 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Aug 24 13:21:55 2012 New Revision: 190647 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190647 Log: Allow arg_pointer_rtx/frame_pointer_rtx for

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-24 13:01:58 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Aug 24 13:01:54 2012 New Revision: 190646 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190646 Log: PR target/54222 * config/avr/t-avr (conv_X

[Bug c++/52597] [C++11] missing diagnostics for invalid use of non-static member function in decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52597 --- Comment #4 from Hubert Tong 2012-08-24 12:42:58 UTC --- I find the message to be confusing.

[Bug target/54222] [avr] Implement fixed-point support

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-24 12:42:53 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Aug 24 12:42:48 2012 New Revision: 190644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190644 Log: libgcc/ PR target/54222 * config/avr/lib1f

[Bug c++/54198] [4.8 Regression] "error: invalid use of incomplete type" when building Chromium

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54198 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-08-24 12:37:21 UTC --- Ping. Any update on this issue?

[Bug c++/54359] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type when defined outside of class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/54359] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type when defined outside of class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-24 12:10:26 UTC --- Done, see PR 54366 and PR 54367 (I probably missed some that could be added to the meta bugs)

[Bug c++/54367] New: [meta-bug] [C++11] lambda expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug #: 54367 Summary: [meta-bug] [C++11] lambda expressions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity:

[Bug c++/53551] -Wunused-local-typedefs misses uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53551 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-24 12:07:57 UTC --- Dodji, can we do something about this?

[Bug c++/51412] [c++0x] Broken diagnostic with invalid lambda expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51412 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/54364] Tail call jumps not threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364 --- Comment #2 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-08-24 12:01:40 UTC --- With -O2 this is cleaned up by bb-reorder.

[Bug c++/54366] New: [meta-bug] decltype issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366 Bug #: 54366 Summary: [meta-bug] decltype issues Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/54365] New: ARM optimization bug when pointer arithmetic wraps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365 Bug #: 54365 Summary: ARM optimization bug when pointer arithmetic wraps Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/52816] [C++11] Access to private members inside decltype in the signature of a member template causes access control error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/52597] [C++11] missing diagnostics for invalid use of non-static member function in decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52597 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-24 11:53:19 UTC --- As the testcase is rejected by 4,7 and trunk, can we close this?

[Bug c++/52269] [C++11] Body of constexpr function templates instantiated too eagerly in unevaluated operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52269 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/6030] References to functions as non-type template args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6030 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at gc

[Bug middle-end/54364] Tail call jumps not threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug middle-end/54364] New: Tail call jumps not threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364 Bug #: 54364 Summary: Tail call jumps not threaded Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/21603] C++ front-end accepts "new" with VLAs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21603 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c/54363] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling malformed struct initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-24 09:08:09 UTC --- --- gimplify.c.jj2012-08-15 10:55:33.0 +0200 +++ gimplify.c2012-08-24 11:01:55.253815273 +0200 @@ -3857,7 +3857,8 @@ optimize_compound_literals_in_ctor (tree if

[Bug target/52990] bootstrap ia64 cross-compiler gcc (static C-only) includes a broken libgcc.a due to libunwind dependencies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52990 Thierry Reding changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thierry.reding@avionic-desi

[Bug c/54363] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE when compiling malformed struct initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54361] Compiling for c++11 gives a warning on scanf() with %as format specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54361 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-08-24 08:02:39 UTC --- It has a lot with C++11, if you read that standard, you'll see that for C library stuff it refers to ISO C99 standard. Therefore, using %as is really invalid in C++11 programs.

[Bug fortran/54350] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_*.f90 -O (internal compiler error) at r190586

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54350 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54350] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_*.f90 -O (internal compiler error) at r190586

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54350 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54350] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_*.f90 -O (internal compiler error) at r190586

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54350 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-24 07:43:31 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Aug 24 07:43:23 2012 New Revision: 190641 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190641 Log: 2012-08-24 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54