http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-08-24 CC| |bonzini at gnu dot org, | |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4 Summary|ICE when compiling |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] |malformed struct |ICE when compiling |initializers |malformed struct | |initializers Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-24 08:35:15 UTC --- Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145256 The problem is that a COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR doesn't have CONSTRUCTOR as its DECL_INITIAL. Either this is a FE bug (tree.def says that it should be CONSTRUCTOR), or we should just tweak optimize_compound_literals_in_ctor not to recurse if TREE_CODE (init) is not CONSTRUCTOR. Correct source would be struct bla{char **a;};void test(void){struct bla b = {.a =(char*[]){"a","b"}};}