[Bug rtl-optimization/53785] coalescing multiple static instances in function scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53785 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-27 06:59:08 UTC --- The question comes, do we want to have a lock for each variable or one for the scope? One for each variable was easier to implement and might be more correct. What happens if getId h

[Bug rtl-optimization/53785] New: coalescing multiple static instances in function scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53785 Bug #: 53785 Summary: coalescing multiple static instances in function scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/53573] template type dependent name resolution broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53573 --- Comment #23 from Keean Schupke 2012-06-27 06:48:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > Is there any chance this 'feature' of GCC could be kept as a g++ specific > > extension in 'gnu++11' mode, as I think the old

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 --- Comment #19 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-27 06:30:05 UTC --- Alas, it doesn't work on i686 or x86_64: the free_alloc_pool in vt_finalize has to be conditional on non-NULL, because we will skip vt_emit_notes (and thus the initializer) in some

[Bug c/53784] Scalar vector binary operation - error with -std=c9x/c1x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53784 --- Comment #2 from Dag Lem 2012-06-27 06:12:37 UTC --- Yes, gcc -fexcess-precision=standard -mavx -S test.c triggers the bug.

[Bug debug/53740] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl bootstrap failure with ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53740 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-27 05:58:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > The bug was introduced in r188527, with the conditionalization of calling > insert_dead_debug_temp in the “else” clause, so that we would no longer insert >

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 --- Comment #18 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-27 05:43:33 UTC --- I've just successfully bootstrapped a recent tree with (and without) the patch on ia64-linux-gnu, so I'm going to regtest it and post it (with proper credit).

[Bug c/53784] Scalar vector binary operation - error with -std=c9x/c1x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53784 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-27 05:42:16 UTC --- This is most likely due to -fexcess-precision= handling.

[Bug debug/53740] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl bootstrap failure with ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53740 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-27 05:42:26 UTC --- The bug was introduced in r188527, with the conditionalization of calling insert_dead_debug_temp in the “else” clause, so that we would no longer insert debug temps for sets that wer

[Bug c/53784] New: Scalar vector binary operation - error with -std=c9x/c1x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53784 Bug #: 53784 Summary: Scalar vector binary operation - error with -std=c9x/c1x Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #17 from Alexandre

[Bug c++/53783] New: [4.8 Regression] lambda in lambda in template function rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53783 Bug #: 53783 Summary: [4.8 Regression] lambda in lambda in template function rejected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-06-26 22:21:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Learned some more. (For reference, this is all from Fr 17 Aug 21:29:16 UTC > 2007 (revision 127595).) > > Not defined by any target, but used in the main

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/53740] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes,rtl bootstrap failure with ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53740 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/47226] [C++0x] GCC doesn't expand template parameter pack that appears in a lambda-expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug target/53682] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in cselib_lookup (SEGV) on i586-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53682] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in cselib_lookup (SEGV) on i586-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-06-26 20:22:05 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Jun 26 20:21:58 2012 New Revision: 188997 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188997 Log: PR debug/53682 * cselib.c (promote_debug_loc): D

[Bug c++/53782] New: Pointer to static function member expression rejected in class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53782 Bug #: 53782 Summary: Pointer to static function member expression rejected in class template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-26 18:52:44 UTC --- Yeah, looking at the test case it's an uninitialized variable. Seems like a hole in the ranking system that it gets a rank of zero. I think a default value that isn't a parm sho

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2012-06-26 18:42:41 UTC --- I wonder why fp_6(D) gets a rank of zero. Is it an uninitialized variable or a parameter? Parms are supposed to get small positive numbers for ranks. Maybe the "right" fix is t

[Bug c/53769] [C11]: Macros __STDC_NO_THREADS__ / __STDC_NO_ATOMIC__ missing.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53769 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-06-26 17:13:52 UTC --- On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote: > OK, this makes clear that for portability, programs should do configure tests > instead of relying on the v

[Bug c++/53781] ICE when compiling a deeply nested template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53781 Oleg Grunin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oleg00 at gmail dot com Version|

[Bug c++/53781] ICE when compiling a deeply nested template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53781 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Grunin 2012-06-26 16:52:17 UTC --- Created attachment 27708 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27708 bzipped precompiled source part 2

[Bug c++/53781] ICE when compiling a deeply nested template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53781 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Grunin 2012-06-26 16:51:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27707 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27707 bzipped precompiled source part 1

[Bug rtl-optimization/53706] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure due to "Invalid write of size 8 at 0xBDC35E: variable_htab_free (var-tracking.c:1418)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53706 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug bootstrap/53779] Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47692] Numeric inaccuracy reported in testing lapack-3.3.0 BLAS module

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53781] New: ICE when compiling a deeply nested template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53781 Bug #: 53781 Summary: ICE when compiling a deeply nested template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug bootstrap/53779] Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-26 15:58:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I wonder if the recent changes to var-tracking.c contain the possibility for a > double-free. > PR 53706.

[Bug lto/53780] New: [l4.7.1 lto] linker fails with lto and "standard" object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780 Bug #: 53780 Summary: [l4.7.1 lto] linker fails with lto and "standard" object file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/53779] Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/47692] Numeric inaccuracy reported in testing lapack-3.3.0 BLAS module

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692 --- Comment #17 from John T 2012-06-26 15:07:48 UTC --- Thank you for reminding me to submit a follow-up. Yes, blas and lapack test cleanly with gcc and gfortran version 4.6.3. I have since encountered a difficulty with the Octave program involv

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 --- Comment #64 from Martin Jambor 2012-06-26 15:01:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #62) > (In reply to comment #61) > > (In reply to comment #57) > > > > Anyway, on the machine where are debugged this, compilation at -O3 > > took over 16 second

[Bug target/35294] iwmmxt intrinsics, internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35294 --- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton 2012-06-26 14:59:54 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Tue Jun 26 14:59:45 2012 New Revision: 188988 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188988 Log: * doc/extend.texi (__builtin_arm_tinsrb): Add m

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 --- Comment #63 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-26 14:58:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #61) > (In reply to comment #57) > > > > I will, on Monday. > > And by Monday I obviously meant yesterday ;-) > > Anyway, on the machine where are debugged

[Bug bootstrap/53779] Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-06-26 14:55:34 UTC --- Try running it under valgrind. Your patch is apparently causing a memory corruption, and the SIGABRT handler tries to call back into malloc/free, which cannot work. Most likely targ

[Bug bootstrap/53779] Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-06-26 14:55:34 UTC --- Try running it under valgrind. Your patch is apparently causing a memory corruption, and the SIGABRT handler tries to call back into malloc/free, which cannot work. Most likely targ

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 --- Comment #62 from Michael Matz 2012-06-26 14:44:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #61) > (In reply to comment #57) > > Anyway, on the machine where are debugged this, compilation at -O3 > took over 16 seconds which dropped to about 13.5 seconds

[Bug middle-end/38474] slow compilation at -O0 due to expand's temp slot goo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 --- Comment #61 from Martin Jambor 2012-06-26 14:26:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #57) > > I will, on Monday. And by Monday I obviously meant yesterday ;-) Anyway, on the machine where are debugged this, compilation at -O3 took over 16 secon

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status

[Bug c++/53752] [4.8 Regression] ice in write_array_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53752] [4.8 Regression] ice in write_array_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53752] [4.8 Regression] ice in write_array_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-26 14:03:06 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jun 26 14:03:02 2012 New Revision: 188987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188987 Log: 2012-06-26 Richard Guenther PR c++/537

[Bug bootstrap/53779] New: Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53779 Bug #: 53779 Summary: Bootstrap hangs waiting for a lock Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53752] [4.8 Regression] ice in write_array_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-06-26 13:55:39 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jun 26 13:55:34 2012 New Revision: 188986 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188986 Log: 2012-06-26 Richard Guenther PR c++/537

[Bug fortran/53771] inconsistent padding long double: mixture of 96 and 128

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53771 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/53778] bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-06-26 11:27:47 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Tue Jun 26 11:27:41 2012 New Revision: 188984 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188984 Log: PR other/33190 * doc/tm.texi.in: Doc

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-06-26 10:47:05 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Tue Jun 26 10:47:01 2012 New Revision: 188983 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188983 Log: PR other/33190 * config/mips/mips.h: Do

[Bug lto/53572] Some public symbols don't get to serialized LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-06-26 10:15:22 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Jun 26 10:15:18 2012 New Revision: 188982 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188982 Log: PR lto/53572 * cgraph.h (varpool_can_remov

[Bug fortran/53778] New: bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778 Bug #: 53778 Summary: bad code (delivering NaN instead of proper result) with -foptimize-sibling-calls Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status

[Bug other/33190] tm.texi describes some non-existing hooks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33190 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug lto/53777] [lto] lto does not propagate optimization flags from command lines given at "compilation time"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53777 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/53729] [4.8 regression] PR53636 fix caused bb-slp-16.c to FAIL on sparc64 and powerpc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53729 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/53729] [4.8 regression] PR53636 fix caused bb-slp-16.c to FAIL on sparc64 and powerpc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53729 --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-06-26 09:05:55 UTC --- Author: uweigand Date: Tue Jun 26 09:05:48 2012 New Revision: 188979 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188979 Log: PR tree-optimization/53729 PR tree-opti

[Bug tree-optimization/53636] SLP may create invalid unaligned memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53636 --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-06-26 09:05:56 UTC --- Author: uweigand Date: Tue Jun 26 09:05:48 2012 New Revision: 188979 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188979 Log: PR tree-optimization/53729 PR tree-opti

[Bug middle-end/53776] pragma optimize does not support Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53776 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/53774] Reassociator generates non-canonical addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53774 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/53731] [4.7] Bootstrap fails for libgfortran on Solaris 10 x86 with error "Where has __float128 gone?"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53731 Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug target/53772] Failed to combine load and jump on vtable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53772 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug middle-end/53776] pragma optimize does not support Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53776 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-26 08:43:36 UTC --- Ofast is recorded as PR 48110.

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-06-26 08:35:59 UTC --- On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug lto/53777] New: [lto] lto does not propagate optimization flags from command lines given at "compilation time"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53777 Bug #: 53777 Summary: [lto] lto does not propagate optimization flags from command lines given at "compilation time" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1

[Bug tree-optimization/53773] Vectorizer generates non-canonical multiplies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug tree-optimization/53748] [4.8 Regression] ice in fold_convert_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53748 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53776] New: pragma optimize does not support Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53776 Bug #: 53776 Summary: pragma optimize does not support Os Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/53748] [4.8 Regression] ice in fold_convert_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53748 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-26 08:02:31 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 08:02:20 2012 New Revision: 188975 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188975 Log: PR tree-optimization/53748 * tree-ssa-phiop