http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-26
12:29:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I have a function in my Fortran code base that looks like this:
[...]
Can you create a full example? It is usually not easy to debug such issues
without having a handle to a full example. Additionally, the code shown does
typically not contain the full information. For instance, the issue might be
due to inlining - but then it depends also on how and where it is inlined.
> If this issue is already known and something along that fixed (in 4.7,
> perhaps?), that would be a nice surprise.
Well, the easiest is that you try it yourself as you have the full source code.
Unofficial builds of 4.7 and 4.8 are available at
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
Having said that, I am not aware of any recent fix which could have directly
fixed that, nor do I know of any issue related to -foptimize-sibling-calls
which still affects the fairly recent 4.6.3.
