http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53778
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-26 12:29:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I have a function in my Fortran code base that looks like this: [...] Can you create a full example? It is usually not easy to debug such issues without having a handle to a full example. Additionally, the code shown does typically not contain the full information. For instance, the issue might be due to inlining - but then it depends also on how and where it is inlined. > If this issue is already known and something along that fixed (in 4.7, > perhaps?), that would be a nice surprise. Well, the easiest is that you try it yourself as you have the full source code. Unofficial builds of 4.7 and 4.8 are available at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries Having said that, I am not aware of any recent fix which could have directly fixed that, nor do I know of any issue related to -foptimize-sibling-calls which still affects the fairly recent 4.6.3.