http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52762
Bug #: 52762
Summary: Firefox 11 segfault with gcc 4.7 (-O3
-march=corei7-avx)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-03-29
06:14:41 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Mar 29 06:14:32 2012
New Revision: 185950
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185950
Log:
2012-03-28 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52746
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-29
02:58:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 29 02:58:29 2012
New Revision: 185945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185945
Log:
PR c++/52746
* typeck.c (lookup_destructor)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32074
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Johnson 2012-03-29 02:46:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> We have __builtin_unreachable() now which should allow for this optimization.
I've been using __builtin_unreachable() for some time now, and it's very nice
f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52746
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #7 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-29 02:15:37 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Thu Mar 29 02:15:29 2012
New Revision: 185944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185944
Log:
2012-03-28 Joey Ye
Backported from m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52761
Bug #: 52761
Summary: [C++11] Missing diagnostic for opaque unscoped enum
declaration without base
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-03-29
01:05:20 UTC ---
I am curious about what this line is doing:
buffer4 = 4_'123'
buffer4 is a kind=1 variable. have you tried: character(kind=4) buffer4(100) ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52597
--- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong 2012-03-28 23:51:37
UTC ---
The message from 4.7.0 does not really make sense, although it probably does
fix the functional issues associated with the reported bug in contexts where
SFINAE applies.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52629
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52760
Bug #: 52760
Summary: Revision 185599 causes miscompare on sphinx3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52759
--- Comment #1 from Adrian Prantl 2012-03-28 21:42:11
UTC ---
Created attachment 27024
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27024
delta-reduced example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52759
Bug #: 52759
Summary: ICE in 4.7.0, C++ in cp/mangle.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
I just tried to analyse the source code of
trunk 20120328 with static analysis tool cppcheck.
The cppcheck said
[libgfortran/intrinsics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas 2012-03-28 20:45:30
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Mar 28 20:45:16 2012
New Revision: 185924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185924
Log:
2012-03-28 Paul Thomas
Tobias Burnus
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52757
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52757
--- Comment #2 from Matt Calabrese
2012-03-28 20:10:02 UTC ---
Hmm. That seems artificially limiting, but thanks for looking it up -- sorry
for the erroneous bug report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52757
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-28
19:58:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> that this happens because there is no constexpr conversion operator from the
> lambda function type to the corresponding function pointer type
Is there s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52757
Bug #: 52757
Summary: [C++11] A lamba functions is not able to be used as a
function pointer when passed as an explicit template
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52740
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-28
19:46:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have GLIBCXX_2.5 installed on my computer and I need version 3.4.9 or
> higher.
> I needed to install version 4 or higher for gcc so I randomly chose to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48133
dcb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from dcb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52740
--- Comment #3 from mohammadsohaibajmal at gmail dot com 2012-03-28 19:07:57
UTC ---
I have GLIBCXX_2.5 installed on my computer and I need version 3.4.9 or higher.
I needed to install version 4 or higher for gcc so I randomly chose to install
gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor 2012-03-28
18:20:28 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Mar 28 18:20:20 2012
New Revision: 185923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185923
Log:
2012-03-28 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor 2012-03-28
18:03:34 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Mar 28 18:03:28 2012
New Revision: 185921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185921
Log:
2012-03-28 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52755
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-28
17:45:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Assigning t2s needs to use the assignment operator, but that function can't be
> implicitly-defined because assigning the volatile member requires
> t1s::o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52755
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-28
17:39:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Following code compiles fine with every gcc, with every g++ -std=c++98,
> with g++-4.5 -std=c++0x, but not with g++ -std=c++0x (or -std=c++11) since
> 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756
Bug #: 52756
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52754
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
17:22:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 27023
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27023
gcc48-pr52754.patch
Patch I had in mind. Seems to fix the testcase. Richard, what do you think
abo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52754
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
16:48:51 UTC ---
Seems ref_at_iteration is buggy, when iter is negative, but ARRAY_REF's index
is TYPE_UNSIGNED smaller than size of pointer, computing the ARRAY_REF's index
in the smaller unsigned typ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614
--- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-28
16:28:42 UTC ---
Dominique, can you please post your patches out on the gcc-patches mailing list
so they can be approved? Again, I'm happy to commit them once they've met
approval by the maintain
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52747
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2012-03-28 16:27:48
UTC ---
The trampoline is only referenced, but never used in your example.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52753
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton 2012-03-28
16:18:58 UTC ---
Thanks Andreas. Forgive my ignorance, but what does -fPIE do exactly (if not
enable Position Independent Executables)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52753
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52754
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52755
Bug #: 52755
Summary: Error on use of implicitly deleted operator=
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52754
Bug #: 52754
Summary: [4.7 regression, miscompilation] indirect indexing
broken with -fpredictive-commoning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52753
Bug #: 52753
Summary: GCC not honoring -fPIE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52752
Bug #: 52752
Summary: GNAT bug box on instantiation of subprogram with "not
null"-qualified named access type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52693
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2012-03-28
15:04:53 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Mar 28 15:04:45 2012
New Revision: 185920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185920
Log:
2012-03-28 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52691
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52750
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52747
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Walton 2012-03-28
14:52:29 UTC ---
My apologies for the additional comments.
$ checksec.sh --file ./warn-test.exe
RELRO STACK CANARY NXPIE RPATH
RUNPATH FILE
Full RELR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52691
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
14:49:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 28 14:49:26 2012
New Revision: 185918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185918
Log:
PR middle-end/52691
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52691
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
14:47:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 28 14:47:45 2012
New Revision: 185917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185917
Log:
PR middle-end/52691
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (optim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52750
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
14:46:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 28 14:46:14 2012
New Revision: 185916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185916
Log:
PR middle-end/52750
* tree-vect-generic.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52750
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
14:41:16 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 28 14:40:57 2012
New Revision: 185914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185914
Log:
PR middle-end/52750
* tree-vect-generic.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52747
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton 2012-03-28
14:33:38 UTC ---
Ah, OK. -Wtrampolines works. But I'm not seeing a warning about the loss of
no-exec stacks:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
(void)argc;
(void)argv;
void foo()
{
print
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50708
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||borut.razem at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #17 from Michael Haubenwallner 2012-03-28 14:20:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Symbolic linking or hard linking libNAME.so.1 to libNAME.so doesn't work? I
> seem to remember something strange about the way AIX loader followed s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50845
Ben Tatham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bentatham at nanometrics
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52694
Andrew John Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu_andrew at member dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn 2012-03-28
12:29:29 UTC ---
Symbolic linking or hard linking libNAME.so.1 to libNAME.so doesn't work? I
seem to remember something strange about the way AIX loader followed symbolic
links.
For versioning one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50931
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|documentation |
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51002
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52692
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
10:40:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The expander now converts as shown below for unaligned moves with V2DF mode.
>
> if (TARGET_SSE_PACKED_SINGLE_INSN_OPTIMAL)
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #13 from Venkataramanan
2012-03-28 10:32:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Having a vector mode changing subreg on the LHS of an instruction is a very
> common issue in the i386 backend, and unfortunately e.g. means that lots of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52737
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52741
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51002
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52751
Bug #: 52751
Summary: private module variable are not exported as local
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52750
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
10:14:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 27020
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27020
gcc48-pr52750.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52741
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-28
10:07:06 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 28 10:06:51 2012
New Revision: 185912
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185912
Log:
PR target/52741
Revert r181936 from 2011-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46539
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Desitter
2012-03-28 10:05:29 UTC ---
Thanks for the workarounds.
For information, the Intel Fortran compiler has "-static-intel" which links
statically Intel provided libraries. Such option may be un-practical for gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52750
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52750
Bug #: 52750
Summary: 32xsigned char __builtin_shuffle
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52554
webmaster at openhardware dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||webmaster at openhardwar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52747
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52692
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-28
09:19:30 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 28 09:19:10 2012
New Revision: 185911
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185911
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2012-03-28 mainline r185910
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52692
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-28
09:13:47 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 28 09:13:41 2012
New Revision: 185910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185910
Log:
gcc/
PR target/52692
* config/avr/avr.c (T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-28
09:06:30 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Mar 28 09:06:03 2012
New Revision: 185909
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185909
Log:
PR middle-end/51893
* expmed.c (store_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52737
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-28
09:04:49 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 28 09:04:11 2012
New Revision: 185908
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185908
Log:
Backport from 2012-03-28 mainline r185907.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52736
--- Comment #14 from Matthias Kretz 2012-03-28 09:03:05
UTC ---
Thanks! Great response time!
And yes, I started to notice the bug on 4.6.x now, too. In different unit
tests, though. I'll see if I can come up with a workaround for the "broken"
co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52746
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52737
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-28
08:31:46 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 28 08:31:26 2012
New Revision: 185907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185907
Log:
PR target/52737
* contrib/gcc_update (file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #15 from Michael Haubenwallner 2012-03-28 08:21:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> > Do you see any technical issue why Import
> > Files cannot be used this way for filename-based versioning over the
> > traditional onefile-membern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52736
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52736
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
08:10:25 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 28 08:09:55 2012
New Revision: 185906
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185906
Log:
PR target/52736
* config/i386/sse.md (sse2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52736
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
08:03:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 28 08:03:11 2012
New Revision: 185905
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185905
Log:
PR target/52736
* config/i386/sse.md (sse2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52736
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-28
08:01:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 28 08:01:00 2012
New Revision: 185904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185904
Log:
PR target/52736
* config/i386/sse.md (sse2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-28 07:59:59 UTC ---
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, abel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106
>
> --- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-03-27
> 14:08:2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52747
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-03-28 07:17:44
UTC ---
Only if you need to take the address of the function. Calling a nested
function from within the containing function doesn't need a trampoline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695
Nagilum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freebsd at nagilum dot org
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52742
--- Comment #1 from Mat 2012-03-28 07:07:58 UTC ---
A shorter reproducer has been shown here: https://gist.github.com/2220810
This does not actually have the template parameters inside the braces.
96 matches
Mail list logo
