[Bug tree-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou 2011-11-19 07:17:58 UTC --- > I tested on machine with -march=amdfam10, with your patch induct run time > improves by ~5%. Other benchmarks are not affected much. OK, thanks. > With your patch, CPU2006 benchm

[Bug c++/50306] ambiguous templated conversion operators accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50306 --- Comment #3 from Marc-Andre Laperle 2011-11-19 05:38:32 UTC --- I tried 4.6.2, r181503 and r180166 and they all compiled the sample code without error. Do you have any local changes or special parameters that made it not compile?

[Bug tree-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 --- Comment #16 from Venkataramanan Kumar 2011-11-19 04:25:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Created attachment 25764 [details] > > Tentative fix (3) > > Final version. Can someone try it on his favorite Fortran

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-19 03:47:39 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:40:49AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > The miscompilation is triggered by -ffrontend-optimize, work-around: use > > -fno-frontend-optimize. > > Rev

[Bug tree-optimization/50729] [4.7 Regression] Silent code gen fault: Value range propagation seems to propagate values across narrowing/widening

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729 --- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-11-19 02:06:36 UTC --- I've added a patch attachment to PR50802 that replaces the test.

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 --- Comment #17 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-11-19 02:05:05 UTC --- Created attachment 25857 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25857 Proposed patch Could you test if this also fixes your regressions?

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/50729] [4.7 Regression] Silent code gen fault: Value range propagation seems to propagate values across narrowing/widening

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729 --- Comment #8 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-11-19 00:03:56 UTC --- More specifically, the problem appears when innerop has a different signedness than middleop, and the value range of middleop is such that the topmost bit of a double_int is u

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51219] New: ICE with structure initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51219 Bug #: 51219 Summary: ICE with structure initializer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51216] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with statement expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51216 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/39976] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Big sixtrack degradation on powerpc 32/64 after revision r146817

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassign

[Bug tree-optimization/50729] [4.7 Regression] Silent code gen fault: Value range propagation seems to propagate values across narrowing/widening

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug target/49868] Implement named address space to place/access data in flash memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/51218] [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-18 23:08:09 UTC --- Created attachment 25856 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25856 Source archive

[Bug fortran/51218] New: [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 Bug #: 51218 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Potential optimization bug Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug bootstrap/51217] Cannot disable bootstrap in gcc 3.4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug c++/51216] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with statement expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51216 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target Milestone|

[Bug c/51217] New: Cannot disable bootstrap in gcc 3.4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51217 Bug #: 51217 Summary: Cannot disable bootstrap in gcc 3.4.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 3.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/51216] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with statement expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51216 Bug #: 51216 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with statement expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/51211] ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2242) with -fgnu-tm -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer --param hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1 and __transaction_atomic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Marlier 2011-11-18 22:52:44 UTC --- After looking at it. I guess the problem was in the tracer... The tracer tries to duplicate the BB where the __transaction_atomic is. Unfortunately this is not valid with trans-mem p

[Bug c++/51215] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid array initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51215 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/51215] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid array initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51215 Bug #: 51215 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid array initializer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 --- Comment #16 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-11-18 22:45:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) I can also replicate this on gcc45 using trunk revision 181496.

[Bug target/51204] g++ does not link getaddrinfo with -lxnet on OpenIndiana

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-18 22:27:22 UTC --- Ah Ok, let's add this: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1794

[Bug target/51204] g++ does not link getaddrinfo with -lxnet on OpenIndiana

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204 Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 --- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-11-18 22:15:29 UTC --- Created attachment 25855 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25855 Preprocessed testcase for epiphany I can't reproduce the test on gcc20, I think this is a

[Bug other/51125] FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 --- Comment #14 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2011-11-18 21:02:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Introduced by the following change: > > 2011-10-17 Richard Guenther > > PR tree-optimization/50729 > * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51188] invalid static_cast from type 'XBase' to type 'int'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51188 --- Comment #14 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 20:32:08 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Fri Nov 18 20:32:04 2011 New Revision: 181492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181492 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2011-11-18 Fa

[Bug tree-optimization/50802] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/51214] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51214] New: [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 Bug #: 51214 Summary: [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187 Daniel Richard G. changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skunk at iskunk dot org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/51213] New: [C++11][DR 1170] Access control checking has to be done under SFINAE conditions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213 Bug #: 51213 Summary: [C++11][DR 1170] Access control checking has to be done under SFINAE conditions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/51204] g++ does not link getaddrinfo with -lxnet on OpenIndiana

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204 Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resol

[Bug java/1131] make fails on solaris 2.5.1 and 2.6

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1131 --- Comment #5 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-11-18 19:50:42 UTC --- "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit: > > --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-18 > 13:11:48 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #2) > Let's share the "previous declaration

[Bug fortran/51208] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-18 19:49:32 UTC --- On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 07:02:25PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 > > --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-18 > 19:02

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 --- Comment #5 from Harald Anlauf 2011-11-18 19:34:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > So it would be nice to actually write the SIG* information also > > to stderr. > > (In reply to comment #3) > > So to get back

[Bug c++/51194] [C++0x] ICE about template aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51194 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-18 19:18:46 UTC --- Here is a smaller reproducer: template struct foo {}; template struct P {}; template class... TT> struct bar { template using mem = P...>; }; bar::mem b;

[Bug c++/51145] [C++11][DR 1131] Alias template in elaborated-type-specifier accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51145 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-18 19:16:52 UTC --- A candidate fix has been posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01945.html

[Bug c++/51204] g++ does not link getaddrinfo with -lxnet on OpenIndiana

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51203] [C++0x] Recursive alias template specialization causes compiler segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51203 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug target/33944] streaming 64-bit integer stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 19:02:49 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Nov 18 19:02:45 2011 New Revision: 181491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181491 Log: Add _mm_stream_si64. 2011-11-18 H.J. Lu

[Bug fortran/51208] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-18 19:02:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Although I think this is equivalent to putting a bandaid > on a AK-47 bullet hole, here you go Thanks for the patch. Only one remark: For allocate (x(2)%a

[Bug c++/51141] [4.7 regression] rev181359 causes Chromium build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51141 --- Comment #4 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 18:44:25 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Fri Nov 18 18:44:23 2011 New Revision: 181490 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181490 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2011-11-18 Fab

[Bug fortran/51208] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-18 18:40:31 UTC --- On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:03:04PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Well, it is not. One can restrict one to the common case of expr->expr_type == > EXPR_VARIABLE and just do

[Bug c++/51204] g++ does not link getaddrinfo with -lxnet on OpenIndiana

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-18 18:38:11 UTC --- > --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini > 2011-11-18 18:28:17 UTC --- > Rainer, any idea what is this about? No, the testcase links fine for me as with both gcc and

[Bug c++/51204] g++ does not link getaddrinfo with -lxnet on OpenIndiana

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51204 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug other/51174] AIX unexpected error_mark node in new TM tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174 --- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn 2011-11-18 18:20:50 UTC --- Your patch will fix the problem, but, as I wrote in comment 10, I think it is wrong. I guess you can change the semantics of tm_mangle() to return NULL for NULL argument, but it cov

[Bug middle-end/51211] ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2242) with -fgnu-tm -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer --param hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1 and __transaction_atomic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/50744] [4.7 Regression] ice in good_cloning_opportunity_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-11-18 18:06:18 UTC --- Proposed fix posted to the mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01935.html

[Bug middle-end/51212] New: ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 3 can not throw but has an EH edge with -fgnu-tm -fnon-call-exceptions and transaction_callable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212 Bug #: 51212 Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 3 can not throw but has an EH edge with -fgnu-tm -fnon-call-exceptions and transaction_callable Classification: Unclassified

[Bug target/33944] streaming 64-bit integer stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33944 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW URL|

[Bug rtl-optimization/51187] miscompilation of genrecog.c at -O2 for --target=avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51187 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |rtl-optimization --- Comment #6 from Eric

[Bug other/51174] AIX unexpected error_mark node in new TM tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/51211] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2242) with -fgnu-tm -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer --param hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1 and __transaction_atomic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51211 Bug #: 51211 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in execute_tm_mark (trans-mem.c:2242) with -fgnu-tm -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer --param hot-bb-frequency-fraction=1 and __transaction_atomic Cla

[Bug c++/51210] New: [C++11][DR 547] std::type_info works incorrectly with function types with cv-qualifier-seq

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51210 Bug #: 51210 Summary: [C++11][DR 547] std::type_info works incorrectly with function types with cv-qualifier-seq Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug target/49868] Implement named address space to place/access data in flash memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-11-18 16:44:12 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Nov 18 16:44:00 2011 New Revision: 181482 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181482 Log: gcc/ PR target/49868 * config/avr/avr.h (b

[Bug tree-optimization/50605] ice in ipa_get_jf_pass_through_result with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50605 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51209] The template _M_find_node in hashtable.h has a bad return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209 --- Comment #4 from Harti Brandt 2011-11-18 16:16:31 UTC --- Thanks a lot, harti From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com [gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 5:11 PM To: Brandt, Hartmu

[Bug libstdc++/51209] The template _M_find_node in hashtable.h has a bad return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51209] The template _M_find_node in hashtable.h has a bad return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 16:09:36 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Nov 18 16:09:29 2011 New Revision: 181480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181480 Log: 2011-11-18 Harti Brandt PR libst

[Bug fortran/51208] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-18 16:03:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > >allocate(i, stat=i) > > 1 > >Error: Stat-variable at (1) shall not be ALLOCATEd within > > the

[Bug fortran/51208] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/51150] [C++11][4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when result of -> initializes const variable of different type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 15:51:47 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Nov 18 15:51:41 2011 New Revision: 181479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181479 Log: /cp 2011-11-18 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51150] [C++11][4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when result of -> initializes const variable of different type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51209] The template _M_find_node in hashtable.h has a bad return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51150] [C++11][4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when result of -> initializes const variable of different type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 15:31:45 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Nov 18 15:31:38 2011 New Revision: 181478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181478 Log: /cp 2011-11-18 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/50605] ice in ipa_get_jf_pass_through_result with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50605 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-11-18 15:13:58 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Nov 18 15:13:54 2011 New Revision: 181477 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181477 Log: 2011-11-18 Martin Jambor PR tree-optimiza

[Bug libstdc++/51209] New: The template _M_find_node in hashtable.h has a bad return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209 Bug #: 51209 Summary: The template _M_find_node in hashtable.h has a bad return value Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51194] [C++0x] ICE about template aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51194 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51191] [C++0x] SEGV on deducing template aliases with non-template alias declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51191 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51150] [C++11][4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when result of -> initializes const variable of different type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/51191] [C++0x] SEGV on deducing template aliases with non-template alias declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51191 --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-18 14:07:49 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Fri Nov 18 14:07:41 2011 New Revision: 181475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181475 Log: PR c++/51191 - ICE on alias of alias template inst

[Bug fortran/51197] [4.7 Regression] Backtrace information less useful

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51150] [C++11][4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE when result of -> initializes const variable of different type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at o

[Bug other/51011] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic-generic.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-18 13:24:22 UTC --- On 17-Nov-11, at 4:49 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote: > Created attachment 25846 > --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25846 > potential second patch

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #57 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-18 13:19:29 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Fri Nov 18 13:19:25 2011 New Revision: 181474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181474 Log: gcc/ada: PR target/50678 * init.c (__gnat_

[Bug c++/51145] [C++11][DR 1131] Alias template in elaborated-type-specifier accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51145 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-18 13:11:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > - error ("using typedef-name %qD after %qs", decl, tag_name (tag_code)); > - error ("%q+D has a previous declaration here", decl); > + if (ali

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51147] attribute((mode(byte))) on an enum generates wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51147 --- Comment #3 from Paul Koning 2011-11-18 11:49:56 UTC --- That workaround seems to do the right thing for what I need, so I'm no longer stuck. Thanks for the suggestion.

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #63 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-18 11:47:01 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Fri Nov 18 11:46:58 2011 New Revision: 181472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181472 Log: gcc/ada: 2011-11-18 Tristan Gingold Iai

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #62 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-18 11:45:48 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Fri Nov 18 11:45:44 2011 New Revision: 181471 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181471 Log: toplevel: PR target/49992 * configure.ac:

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #61 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-18 10:54:24 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Fri Nov 18 10:54:21 2011 New Revision: 181470 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181470 Log: gcc/ada: 2011-11-18 Tristan Gingold Iai

[Bug target/49992] lto-bootstrap reveals duplicate symbols on x86_64-apple-darwin11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992 --- Comment #60 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-18 10:52:37 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Fri Nov 18 10:52:32 2011 New Revision: 181469 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181469 Log: toplevel: PR target/49992 * configure.ac:

[Bug fortran/51207] [OOP] Mark __def_init_... as FL_PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51207 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-18 10:00:43 UTC --- allocate(t :: y) allocate(x, mold=x) The last line should be: "x, mold=y". (Cf. PR 51208.)

[Bug fortran/51208] New: [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 Bug #: 51208 Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/51118] [4.7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘typed’ structure, have ‘block’ in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:14160

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86 | Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/51181] [4.7 regression] libstdc++.so __sync_sub_and_fetch_4 linkage error causing many test suite failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-11-18 09:50:30 UTC --- Testing Richard's patch ...

[Bug tree-optimization/51118] [4.7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘typed’ structure, have ‘block’ in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:14160

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-18 09:54:07 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Fri Nov 18 09:54:02 2011 New Revision: 181468 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181468 Log: PR tree-optimization/51118 * fold-co

[Bug fortran/51207] [OOP] Mark __def_init_... as FL_PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51207 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug fortran/51207] New: [OOP] Mark __def_init_... as FL_PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51207 Bug #: 51207 Summary: [OOP] Mark __def_init_... as FL_PARAMETER Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug c++/51194] ICE about template aliasing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51194 --- Comment #2 from fate66260 at gmail dot com 2011-11-18 08:59:28 UTC --- http://ideone.com/lZEbs g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 2012 g++ -std=c++0x a.cpp -- a.cpp: In instantiation of

[Bug c/51206] Building Cross-Compiler for Linux/x86_64 multilibs fails due to FLAGS_FOR_TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206 --- Comment #1 from gcc at rkeene dot org 2011-11-18 08:27:00 UTC --- If I remove the "-B.../lib" argument from x86_64-slackware-linux/libgcc/Makefile then both the 32-bit and the 64-bit libgcc builds complete. That is, if I change the line from:

[Bug c/51206] New: Building Cross-Compiler for Linux/x86_64 multilibs fails due to FLAGS_FOR_TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206 Bug #: 51206 Summary: Building Cross-Compiler for Linux/x86_64 multilibs fails due to FLAGS_FOR_TARGET Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status

[Bug c++/51203] Recursive alias template specialization causes compiler segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51203 Pubby8 changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |trivial

  1   2   >