http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49431
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-17
06:11:35 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 17 06:11:31 2011
New Revision: 175137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175137
Log:
2011-06-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/493
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49448
Summary: gcc configure script wrongly detect
TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN_DEFAULT
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435
--- Comment #4 from Valery 2011-06-17 05:05:47
UTC ---
Hi Richard!
Many thanks for quick answer.
If I understood you correctly, see result files in attachments.
If I am not right, tell that it is necessary to make for problem elimination.
Valery
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435
--- Comment #3 from Valery 2011-06-17 04:59:00
UTC ---
Created attachment 24551
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24551
Out of the making
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435
--- Comment #2 from Valery 2011-06-17 04:58:17
UTC ---
Created attachment 24550
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24550
Error out of the making
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49447
Summary: operator= (and compound assignment ops) does not
perfectly forward
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
02:20:14 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 02:20:11 2011
New Revision: 175133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175133
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* gcc.dg/tortur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-17
02:18:27 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Fri Jun 17 02:18:24 2011
New Revision: 175132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175132
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48542
* reload.c (fin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49251
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49251
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-17
01:06:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 17 01:06:42 2011
New Revision: 175130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175130
Log:
PR c++/49251
* semantics.c (finish_id_expre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-17
01:06:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 17 01:06:50 2011
New Revision: 175131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175131
Log:
PR c++/49229
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [FUNCTION
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-17
00:16:55 UTC ---
This same behavior exists for LIBICONV in the multi lib of libstdc++-v3...
[MacPro:darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libstdc++-v3] howarth% grep
LIBICONV *
Makefile:LIBICONV = -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49420
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-17
00:09:42 UTC ---
I don't believe r169822 is the cause but I see what is happening. During the
build two libgcj.spec files are generated. One in
x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libjava, which properly substitu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45378
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44160
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-16 23:15:47 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, rmansfield at qnx dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
>
> --- Comment #6 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-06-16
> 23:00:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #6 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-06-16
23:00:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> EABI targets force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT, so the vast majority of users of
> the ARM port won't hit this assert. If you really care about old-ABI
> target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49431
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2011-06-16 22:58:44 UTC ---
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:32:08PM +, linuxl4 at sohu dot com wrote:
>
> >real :: D2R = 0.017453292519943 ! <--- here
>
> I know this. I just wonder
>
> real D2R = 0.01745329
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49446
Summary: avr-g++ does not optimize when using bitshift in
inlined function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49420
--- Comment #2 from Jarryd Beck 2011-06-16
22:55:44 UTC ---
That fixes it for me. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49431
--- Comment #3 from macius bat 2011-06-16 22:31:51
UTC ---
>real :: D2R = 0.017453292519943 ! <--- here
I know this. I just wonder
real D2R = 0.017453292519943
is legal according to the standard?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
--- Comment #7 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 22:18:14 UTC ---
I want to emphasize again that the error I wanted to report was that gfortran
is rejecting valid structure constructor expressions (see comment 3). It looks
from you e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-16
22:09:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:09:12 2011
New Revision: 175121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175121
Log:
PR c++/45399
* lex.c (lex_raw_string): Don
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
--- Comment #6 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 22:12:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > An intuitive way of viewing (and maybe even implementing I guess) the
> > process
> > triggered by a structure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49251
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-16
22:09:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:08:57 2011
New Revision: 175119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175119
Log:
PR c++/49251
* semantics.c (finish_id_expre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45378
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-16
22:09:25 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:09:20 2011
New Revision: 175122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175122
Log:
PR c++/45378
* decl.c (check_initializer):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-16
22:09:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:09:05 2011
New Revision: 175120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175120
Log:
PR c++/49229
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [FUNCTION
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44160
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-16
22:09:32 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:09:28 2011
New Revision: 175123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175123
Log:
PR c++/44160
* parser.c (cp_parser_lambda_b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-16
22:08:23 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:08:20 2011
New Revision: 175118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175118
Log:
PR target/49307
* config/sh/sh.md (UNSP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49420
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-16
22:05:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:05:46 2011
New Revision: 175117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175117
Log:
PR c++/49420
* error.c (dump_template_argum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307
--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-16
22:02:48 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Jun 16 22:02:45 2011
New Revision: 175116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175116
Log:
PR target/49307
* config/sh/sh.md (UNSP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49432
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-16
21:55:36 UTC ---
The test passes with the following patch:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/invalid-type-1.mm2010-11-19
18:12:20.0 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/invalid-t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16 21:49:28 UTC ---
r175113 fixes the problem on trunk. Is it worth backporting this to 4.6?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16 21:45:29 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Jun 16 21:45:26 2011
New Revision: 175113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175113
Log:
2011-06-16 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16 21:29:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> An intuitive way of viewing (and maybe even implementing I guess) the process
> triggered by a structure constructor is as a sequence of assignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-16
21:10:18 UTC ---
Something like this:
Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===
--- tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c(revision 61384)
+++ tree-ssa-loop-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-16 21:07:00 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, rmansfield at qnx dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
>
> Ryan Mansfield changed:
>
>What|Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-16 20:51:00 UTC ---
> It has been a while, but I think either _Jv_NewStringUTF
> or _Jv_NewStringUtf8Const. IIRC one of these is run
> during class initialization to turn string const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
--- Comment #4 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 20:49:32 UTC ---
An intuitive way of viewing (and maybe even implementing I guess) the process
triggered by a structure constructor is as a sequence of assignment statements
for the com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-16 20:38:52
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Thu Jun 16 20:38:49 2011
New Revision: 175112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175112
Log:
2011-06-16 Steve Ellcey
PR testsuite/48727
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
--- Comment #3 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 20:35:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Note: Intrinsic assignments to polymorphic variables are forbidden [...]
This was really about the structure constructor; the assignment was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49343
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48613
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445
Summary: Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator
float"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49343
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-16
20:21:24 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Jun 16 20:21:21 2011
New Revision: 175111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175111
Log:
2011-06-16 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-16
20:16:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well, I'm 100% sure this is just the age-old bug that GCC can't expand
> misaligned indirect-refs (or nowadays mem-refs and target-mem-refs) on
> strict-alig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-16
20:08:43 UTC ---
Well, I'm 100% sure this is just the age-old bug that GCC can't expand
misaligned indirect-refs (or nowadays mem-refs and target-mem-refs) on
strict-align targets properly.
Try the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP][F2008] gfortran |[OOP] gfortran rejects
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49444
Summary: IV-OPTs changes an unaligned loads into aligned loads
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48613
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-16
19:37:44 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Jun 16 19:37:37 2011
New Revision: 175109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175109
Log:
2011-06-16 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey 2011-06-16 18:57:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I couldn't find so far where this is initialized for the
> static string src.
It has been a while, but I think either _Jv_NewStringUTF
or _Jv_NewStringUtf8Cons
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-16 18:18:59 UTC ---
> It is set when the array is created.
> I would suggest stepping through String::getBytes.
When I do this, I find that the count argument to _Jv_NewPrimArray is
0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49419
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-16
18:18:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 24548
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24548
gcc47-vrp.patch
So, I've tried this patch for extract_range_from_assert.
It bootstrapped/regtested o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
--- Comment #6 from eisoab at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 18:07:41 UTC ---
Eiso AB wrote:
> sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
>>
>> --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl> apl.washington.edu>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #17 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16 18:00:57 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Jun 16 18:00:54 2011
New Revision: 175106
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175106
Log:
2011-06-16 Tom de Vries
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #16 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16 17:57:12 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Jun 16 17:57:08 2011
New Revision: 175105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175105
Log:
2011-06-16 Tom de Vries
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
--- Comment #5 from eisoab at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 17:56:10 UTC ---
sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
>
> --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
> 2011-06-16 17:52:39 UTC ---
> On Thu,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2011-06-16 17:52:39 UTC ---
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 05:36:35PM +, eisoab at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > What is the configure command line you used to configure
> > the gcc?
> >
> >
> nothing. just ../confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey 2011-06-16 17:44:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I haven't yet found where src_a->length is supposed to be initialized. Any
> suggestions?
It is set when the array is created.
I would suggest stepping throu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
--- Comment #3 from eisoab at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 17:36:15 UTC ---
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
>
> kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
> What|Removed |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44643
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@bike-nomad.com
--- Comment #13 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26883
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42974
Tero Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #27 from Easwaran Raman 2011-06-16
17:14:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
> >
> > davidxl changed:
> >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at gcc dot gnu.org,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49436
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-16
16:33:16 UTC ---
I was testing on SandyBridge, but it was reported to us for Core2.
The loop used to be vectorized in 4.4 and is now too, in both cases it does a
huge hard to decipher test with many co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #8 from Easwaran Raman 2011-06-16
16:27:44 UTC ---
Compiling x.c with a ia64-unknown-linux cross compiler, setting a breakpoint in
can_escape(), I see that,
(gdb) p debug_rtx (body)
(set (mem/s/c:DI (reg/f:DI 341) [2 s1+0 S8 A64])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-16 16:13:42
UTC ---
Created attachment 24547
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24547
Dump file with vectorize details
Dump file from vect-peel-3.c when run with
-ftree-vectorize -fno-ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c fail on
IA64 after testsuite change
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49439
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-16
16:07:46 UTC ---
Well, it just expose the previously latent problem. I will take a look into
the partitioning code...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
--- Comment #24 from Marc Glisse 2011-06-16
15:59:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Hmm, looks like I need to delay evaluation of noexcept for implicitly declared
> functions, too.
Hello,
just to confirm: this has solved for us all the pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49439
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743
--- Comment #5 from Joe Stroller
2011-06-16 15:10:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Does this solve your problem?
Yes! Thank you, Mikael, and apologies for not testing sooner.
The fix in attachment 24326 works perfectly.
I tested it on gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Misaligned store support
pessimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49441
Summary: @LDLIBICONV@ lost from installed libgcj.spec
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48887
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-16 14:32:38 UTC ---
Note: Apparenty "select_type_23.f03" in the testsuite is invalid due to this PR
(cf. PR 48699).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49428
--- Comment #2 from ecologicyborg at gmail dot com 2011-06-16 14:31:28 UTC ---
2011/6/16 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49428
>
> Richard Guenther changed:
>
> What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #29 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-16
13:54:45 UTC ---
Works For Me.
[rth@anchor bld-avr-46]$ size avr/avr25/libgcc/_lshrdi3.o
text databssdechexfilename
244 0 0244
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49398
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-16
13:51:20 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jun 16 13:51:17 2011
New Revision: 175104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175104
Log:
Revert r174940
Fix PR target/49398
Mod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46500
--- Comment #10 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2011-06-16 13:45:54 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Jun 16 13:45:47 2011
New Revision: 175103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175103
Log:
PR middle-end/46500
gcc:
* doc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49438
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49440
--- Comment #2 from Iurii Gordiienko 2011-06-16 13:23:47
UTC ---
Created attachment 24546
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24546
small example for reprodusing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49440
--- Comment #1 from Iurii Gordiienko 2011-06-16 13:22:31
UTC ---
4.5.1, 4.5.2 - same result
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49440
Summary: Invalid dynamic_cast for unnamed namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
