http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2011-06-16 21:07:00 UTC --- On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, rmansfield at qnx dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511 > > Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> 2011-06-16 > 20:17:00 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #2) > > I don't see this with an arm-linux-gnu toolchain for r163798. > > Were you using a 64 bit host? > > 8486 if (immtype == 17) > 8487 { > 8488 /* FIXME: Broken on 32-bit H_W_I hosts. */ > 8489 gcc_assert (sizeof (HOST_WIDE_INT) == 8); EABI targets force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT, so the vast majority of users of the ARM port won't hit this assert. If you really care about old-ABI targets (and deprecation of arm-linux-gnu and arm-elf is long overdue), maybe ARM should just force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT unconditionally.
