http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47377
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47377
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-21
07:11:09 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jan 21 07:11:05 2011
New Revision: 169079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169079
Log:
2011-01-21 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-21 05:52:47
UTC ---
Should ivopts use signed integer instead of unsigned integer
for index type if it is known to be negative?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47391
Summary: read from const volatile incorrectly eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-21 05:33:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The ivopts pass transforms
>
>
> unsigned int D.2715;
> unsigned int D.2716;
> ...
> D.2715_43 = (unsigned int) elems_3(D);
> D.2716_42 = D.2715_43 + 429
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
Summary|[x32] Incorrect a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390
Summary: Linking with -export-dynamic broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47388
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-21 01:02:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 23057
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23057
range-for testcase
Probably the same problem.
$ gcc -fno-for-scope -std=c++0x testcase.C
testcase.C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47389
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23056|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47389
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-01-21 00:59:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 23056
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23056
range-for testcase
Probably the same problem.
$ gcc -fno-for-scope -std=c++0x testcase.C
testcase.C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47365
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.6.0 |
Summary|[4.5 Regression] wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-21
00:02:38 UTC ---
Thanks Jon. Sometimes I despair we can make progress on the documentation ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47387
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-20
23:41:28 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Jan 20 23:41:24 2011
New Revision: 169072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169072
Log:
2011-01-20 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-20 23:28:32
UTC ---
When fwprop props subreg, it should check
1. If inner register is dead after use.
2. If subreg is used in multi-word operations.
3. If subreg is a paradoxical subreg.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47371
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47389
Summary: ICE: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:395 with
-fno-combine-stack-adjustments -fno-dse
-fno-tree-forwprop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42603
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6709
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47388
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in begin_for_stmt, at
cp/semantics.c:863 with -fno-for-scope and for(;;)
inside a template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47387
Summary: AIX ctype 'mask' override not working
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47386
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47386
Summary: Wrong warning: ‘w.dim[2].stride’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner 2011-01-20
20:57:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 23052
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23052
Preliminary patch to allow --with-cpu=power7 to work
The root problem is under VSX, the vec_ld/ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47251
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47361
--- Comment #1 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-20
20:47:31 UTC ---
A candidate patch was posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01414.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47385
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2011-01-20
20:44:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23051
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23051
Patch to fix the problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47385
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47385
Summary: Test gcc.target/powerpc/pr37168.c fails if compiled
using a compiled configured with --with-cpu=power7
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
20:36:36 UTC ---
no problem, re-categorising bugs as features via documentation is easy ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2011-01-20
20:29:22 UTC ---
Thank you, the new paragraph is great :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
--- Comment #13 from Omar Choudary 2011-01-20
20:20:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 23050
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23050
Patch for gcc version 4.5.2 since the original patch only works for 4.5.1
This patch should be used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
20:18:32 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 20 20:18:29 2011
New Revision: 169064
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169064
Log:
2011-01-20 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski 2011-01-20
20:16:11 UTC ---
*** Bug 47384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
--- Comment #3 from Omar Choudary 2011-01-20
20:15:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is still a duplicate of the bug you referenced. We don't keep around
> different bug reports for the same bug even if they are reported against
> diffe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
20:14:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> You didn't think the reference to a first version in 1999 might have been a
> hint those docs were written a long time ago :)
or the fact that the referen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Omar Choudary changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
20:12:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Yes it is, and no, we are not going to "fix" the legacy simulated concepts,
> > we
> > are barely keeping the code, for now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45261
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||choudary.omar at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47384
Summary: Doesn't indicate failure status when it doesn't
support (attiny2313A)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-20 20:06:45
UTC ---
The testcase is added to the Bionic C library port at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=devel/binutils/hjl/x32.git;a=summary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36104
--- Comment #13 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-20
20:04:29 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Jan 20 20:04:25 2011
New Revision: 169063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169063
Log:
2011-01-20 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
Summary: [x32] Incorrect array access
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47382
Summary: [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-d-1.C FAILs with
-finline-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2011-01-20
19:40:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Yes it is, and no, we are not going to "fix" the legacy simulated concepts, we
> are barely keeping the code, for now.
Ok. If it is a "legacy", would you mind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
--- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-20
19:27:27 UTC ---
Know this is not high-priority bug for 4.6.0 but it should be as constexpr is a
new feature and the initial QoI for diagnostics is important for user's first
impressions. Diagnosti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
19:06:05 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 20 19:06:03 2011
New Revision: 169062
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169062
Log:
Use x32_lea_nonmemory_operand on 64bit LEA s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-20 18:59:10
UTC ---
Another crash
[hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-13]$ cat x.i
struct foo_t {
int limit;
} foo[3];
void
bar () {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
__builtin_memset (&foo[i], 0, sizeof(*foo));
}
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47338
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Starke
2011-01-20 18:51:53 UTC ---
As this patch also works with gcc 4.5.x I'd like to request this change for the
gcc 4.5 branch as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44081
--- Comment #12 from Valeriy 2011-01-20 18:23:29 UTC ---
/*attr_nn.c*/
#include
static void attr_nn(int i1, int *i2, int *i3) __attribute__((__nonnull__(2)));
static void attr_nn(int i1, int *i2, int *i3) {
*i2 = i1;
if (i3 ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-01-20
18:13:40 UTC ---
And thanks for that indeed. By the way, certainly I have no principled
objections to somebody dealing with issues like the one pointed out by Marc,
but only if we are *100%* sure it do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45149
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
17:42:17 UTC ---
I'll fix the outdated reference to concepts in the docs though
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||41085
--- Comment #19 from Hans-Pete
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
17:28:54 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 20 17:28:49 2011
New Revision: 169059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169059
Log:
Fix LEA alternative in *add_1/*addsi_1_zext
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46583
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46583
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-20
16:56:30 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jan 20 16:56:25 2011
New Revision: 169058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169058
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/46583
* tree-ssa-live.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
Summary: [x32] internal compiler error: in gen_lowpart_general,
at rtlhooks.c:59
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
16:40:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 20 16:40:36 2011
New Revision: 169057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169057
Log:
PR debug/47283
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debug_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47371
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-01-20
16:37:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 20 16:37:28 2011
New Revision: 169056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169056
Log:
PR testsuite/47371
* gcc.target/i386/headme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #35 from Michael Matz 2011-01-20 16:36:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 23047
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23047
possible patch
So, this is my current version. I'm creating a different type for top-level
symbols
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47367
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-20 16:12:10 UTC
---
> It works for me with current trunk which suggests this is a duplicate bug
> that was fixed in the meantime. Please re-check with a more recent version.
Yes, I am pretty sure it is dup
> It works for me with current trunk which suggests this is a duplicate bug
> that was fixed in the meantime. Please re-check with a more recent version.
Yes, I am pretty sure it is dup of the inliner bug I was fixing earlier this
year.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47380
Summary: concept checking and incomplete types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #24 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-01-20
15:42:17 UTC ---
A candidate fix was posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01381.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #15 from Vincent Gramoli
2011-01-20 15:14:21 UTC ---
Thanks!
Vincent
On Jan 20, 2011, at 3:31 PM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
>
> --- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
Summary: fwprop1 generates bad codes for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47361
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20
15:01:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 23046
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23046
slightly reduced and unincluded testcase
confirmed with 4.5 and 4.6
attachment produced by
g++46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47370
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47370
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-20
14:42:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 20 14:42:20 2011
New Revision: 169055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169055
Log:
2011-01-20 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47377
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-20
14:30:50 UTC ---
Vincent, this is bug 47340. I will be looking at this today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47378
Summary: ld warning linking with libgo.so: relocation bound to
a symbol with STV_PROTECTED visibility
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-20
13:46:14 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jan 20 13:46:11 2011
New Revision: 169054
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169054
Log:
Fix ix86_delegitimize_address for x32 PIC
g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-20 13:41:02
UTC ---
A different crash:
[hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-11]$ cat x.i
typedef unsigned short ush;
typedef ush Pos;
extern ush prev[];
void fill_window( unsigned more, unsigned m)
{
unsigned n;
for (n =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47377
Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:1906
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-20
13:38:44 UTC ---
Documentation for getpwuid_r from POSIX:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/getpwuid.html
and for LINUX, which contains a getpwuid_r example:
http://www.kerne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47041
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-01-20 13:16:46 UTC ---
I quickly tried to link a C program statically that uses getpwuid_r. It has the
same problem. I guess it is unavoidable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-01-20 13:12:02
UTC ---
Indeed, it never occurred to me but it should.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47375
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47368
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-20
13:03:31 UTC ---
Should I open an enhancement PR for consistent usage of CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
with --enable-build-with-cxx? We should have all of the libs build with that
flag under CXX rather than CFLAG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47376
Summary: Duplicate member through anonymous unions not reported
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47366
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
