[Bug fortran/46327] type field access by . (instead of %) unsupported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl 2010-11-06 06:49:55 UTC --- On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:19:57PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:01:45AM +, jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com > wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b

[Bug debug/45939] Wrong debug info: Negative location range generated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-06 06:31:04 UTC --- Author: krebbel Date: Sat Nov 6 06:31:02 2010 New Revision: 166396 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166396 Log: 2010-11-06 Andreas Krebbel PR debug/459

[Bug debug/45939] Wrong debug info: Negative location range generated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-06 06:29:02 UTC --- Author: krebbel Date: Sat Nov 6 06:28:59 2010 New Revision: 166395 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166395 Log: 2010-11-06 Andreas Krebbel PR debug/459

[Bug fortran/46327] type field access by . (instead of %) unsupported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl 2010-11-06 06:20:06 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:01:45AM +, jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327 > > --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil > 2010-11-

[Bug fortran/46327] type field access by . (instead of %) unsupported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327 --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil 2010-11-06 05:01:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hopefully, this will never be supported in gfortran. The problem is users continue to use iFort and I have to continue supporting it in GDB as they sources

[Bug fortran/46327] type field access by . (instead of %) unsupported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46327 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/46327] New: type field access by . (instead of %) unsupported

AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Some legacy Fortrans supported access type.field (like in C). It works with iFort (11.1 20100806). It does not work with: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.4.6 20101105 (prerelease) GNU Fortran

[Bug target/46326] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166382 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46326 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-06 04:08:39 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Nov 6 04:08:34 2010 New Revision: 166394 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166394 Log: Fix a typo in ix86_delegitimize_address. 20

[Bug other/45238] gccgo failure to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45238 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/37178] false positive with -Wstrict-overflow=2 on code not involving signed overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37178 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/46325] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/char_initialiser_actual.f90 FAILs with -fstack-protector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46325 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/45473] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in dfs_walk_once, at cp/search.c:1659

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45473 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-06 01:44:34 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Nov 6 01:44:31 2010 New Revision: 166391 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166391 Log: PR c++/45473 * search.c (look_for_overrides

[Bug target/46326] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166382 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46326 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/46313] [OOP] OOP-ABI issue, ALLOCATE issue, CLASS renaming issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-06 00:37:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Namespace: A-Z: (UNKNOWN 0) > procedure name = MAIN__ > symtree: 'MAIN__' || symbol: 'MAIN__' > type spec : (UNKNOWN 0) > at

[Bug target/46326] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166382 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46326 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166382 failed to bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assigned

[Bug c/44772] [4.5 Regression] -Wc++-compat warns incorrectly for anonymous unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression]|[4.5 Regression] |-Wc++

[Bug c/44772] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -Wc++-compat warns incorrectly for anonymous unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-06 00:07:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Nov 6 00:07:50 2010 New Revision: 166384 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166384 Log: PR c/44772 * c-decl.c (warn_cxx_compat_fini

[Bug middle-end/46325] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/char_initialiser_actual.f90 FAILs with -fstack-protector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46325 Summary: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/char_initialiser_actual.f90 FAILs with -fstack-protector Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/46084] gcc.dg/split-4.c failed with -mavx -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46084 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/46084] gcc.dg/split-4.c failed with -mavx -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46084 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-05 23:45:38 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Nov 5 23:45:32 2010 New Revision: 166383 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166383 Log: gcc/: PR target/46084 * explow.c (al

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 --- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-11-05 23:33:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Everything seems wrong. Yes, you aren't exaggerating! I am continuing to try and figure out what's going wrong.

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 23:31:23 UTC --- Created attachment 22301 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22301 selfassign.so generated by gold

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 23:30:36 UTC --- Created attachment 22300 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22300 selfassign.so generated by bfd linker

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 23:27:51 UTC --- -fwhopr=jobserver -fuse-linker-plugin -frandom-seed=1 miscompiled selfassign.so. It generated: [...@gnu-32 stage1-gcc]$ nm selfassign.so | grep plugin_init 09aa T plugin_init [.

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

opt/cfarm/gmp-4.2.4 - -with-mpc=/opt/cfarm/mpc-0.8 --with-libelf=/n/10/davek/usr --enable-bootstrap ". ..} (gdb) p plugin_version[0] $6 = {basever = 0x77567d29 "4.6.0", datestamp = 0x77567d2f "20101105", devphase = 0x77567d38 "experimental", revision

[Bug tree-optimization/46177] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in prop_phis, at tree-loop-distribution.c:327 with -fno-tree-copy-prop -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-11-05 22:38:18 UTC --- On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177 > > --- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-05 > 21:37:28 UTC ---

[Bug tree-optimization/46036] [4.6 Regression] verify_ssa failed: definition in block 3 follows the use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46036 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-05 22:01:34 UTC --- Created attachment 22299 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22299 patch Here is a patch that solves the problem. Not tested yet.

[Bug tree-optimization/46177] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in prop_phis, at tree-loop-distribution.c:327 with -fno-tree-copy-prop -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177 --- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-05 21:37:28 UTC --- Created attachment 22298 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22298 another testcase Thank you for having a look at this issue! The original testcase testsuite/gcc.dg/tr

[Bug target/45585] [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9 for gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90 with -O2 -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner 2010-11-05 21:31:42 UTC --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Nov 5 21:31:38 2010 New Revision: 166379 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166379 Log: Fix PR 45585, darwin brain damage Modified:

[Bug target/45585] [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9 for gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90 with -O2 -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp.com --- Comment #13 from

[Bug java/46324] New: gcj should support the javac flags such as -verbose, -sourcepath and -source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46324 Summary: gcj should support the javac flags such as -verbose, -sourcepath and -source Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/46321] [OOP] Polymorphic deallocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/46280] [4.6 regression] Several testcases FAIL with 16byte alignment ABI warning on Solaris 8/9 x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug debug/46322] New: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'reg' in dbxout_parms, at dbxout.c:3498 with -gstabs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46322 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'reg' in dbxout_parms, at dbxout.c:3498 with -gstabs Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/46160] [4.5 Regression] ICE with volatile structure and enum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE|[4.5 Regression] ICE with

[Bug target/45670] [4.6 Regression] Less efficient x86 addressing mode selection on 4.6, causes -Os size regression from 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45670 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46160] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE with volatile structure and enum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-05 19:02:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 5 19:02:46 2010 New Revision: 166372 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166372 Log: PR c++/46160 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_gimplify_e

[Bug target/45670] [4.6 Regression] Less efficient x86 addressing mode selection on 4.6, causes -Os size regression from 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45670 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-05 19:00:32 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Nov 5 19:00:27 2010 New Revision: 166371 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166371 Log: PR target/45670 * expr.c (expand_expr_real_

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 18:53:25 UTC --- Revision 166265 is OK.

[Bug target/44754] m32c_pragma_memregs / m32c_pragma_address warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44754 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/44754] m32c_pragma_memregs / m32c_pragma_address warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44754 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-05 18:46:29 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Fri Nov 5 18:46:22 2010 New Revision: 166370 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166370 Log: PR target/44754 * config/m32c/m3

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-05 18:42:38 UTC --- > It only happens on 32bit host. It doesn't happen with -m32 > on Linux/x86-64. Ah, interesting, thanks. The wrong transformation is done by VRP2 but I fail to see which recent chang

[Bug fortran/45451] [OOP] Inconsistent status of ALLOCATABLE components inside CLASS variables.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45451 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46174] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE: Deep copy missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46174 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46321] New: [OOP] Polymorphic deallocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321 Summary: [OOP] Polymorphic deallocation Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn

[Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314 --- Comment #10 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2010-11-05 18:17:01 UTC --- Here is the backported patch that fixes the ICE. I will further test this and will post to gcc-patches. Sebastian

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

Here is the backported patch that fixes the ICE. I will further test this and will post to gcc-patches. Sebastian From 8f0cc975c09d2e0779f7e25a82a295f3deb9de46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Pop Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:15:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR45314: backport revision 163123.

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45451] [OOP] Inconsistent status of ALLOCATABLE components inside CLASS variables.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45451 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-05 18:15:02 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Fri Nov 5 18:14:52 2010 New Revision: 166368 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166368 Log: 2010-11-05 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/46174] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE: Deep copy missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46174 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-05 18:15:02 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Fri Nov 5 18:14:52 2010 New Revision: 166368 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166368 Log: 2010-11-05 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 18:12:25 UTC --- Please show command line passed to cc1.

[Bug middle-end/41633] -Wframe-larger-than should warn about outgoing function calls, specifically varargs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41633 Frank Ch. Eigler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 18:04:46 UTC --- Just for the record, this is introduced by revision 155739: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00200.html

[Bug libstdc++/46320] Operator[] dereference does not generate exception for empty string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46320 --- Comment #2 from Jerry Carter 2010-11-05 17:55:25 UTC --- Apologies. I understood there to be a correspondence between the two (given that basic_string::at is implemented using basic_string::operator[]) but I now realize on second reading tha

[Bug libstdc++/46320] Operator[] dereference does not generate exception for empty string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46320 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++

[Bug c/41206] Segmentation fault from two "#pragma GCC optimize" lines

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41206 Nathan Froyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46320] New: Operator[] dereference does not generate exception for empty string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46320 Summary: Operator[] dereference does not generate exception for empty string Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/46319] LTO plugin test failures with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|LTO plugin test failures|LTO plugin test failures |wit

[Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug lto/46319] New: LTO plugin test failures with --wi th-plugin-ld=ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319 Summary: LTO plugin test failures with --wi th-plugin-ld=ld Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: u

[Bug c++/46317] Incorrect construction vtable on ARM in case of diamond shaped virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317 --- Comment #2 from end3er at gmail dot com 2010-11-05 17:06:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does -fno-tree-sink fixes the issue? No it doesn't. The only flags that works are: -O0 or -fno-inline or -fno-unit-at-a-time or -fno-toplevel-reorde

[Bug ada/46318] New: ICE (GNAT bug box) on invalid

20101105 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure sinfo.adb:1831| | Error detected at n.adb:4:14 [m.adb:3:3] | | Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.| | Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug

[Bug c++/46317] Incorrect construction vtable on ARM in case of diamond shaped virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-05 16:55:29 UTC --- Does -fno-tree-sink fixes the issue?

[Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314 --- Comment #7 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2010-11-05 16:51:22 UTC --- On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:26, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > On trunk, it was fixed by revision 163123: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00334.html > Thank

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:26, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > On trunk, it was fixed by revision 163123: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00334.html > Thanks HJ for reducing this. I looked at this change and it looks simple enough to backport it to 4.5.

[Bug c++/46317] New: Incorrect construction vtable on ARM in case of diamond shaped virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317 Summary: Incorrect construction vtable on ARM in case of diamond shaped virtual inheritance Product: gcc Version: 4.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priorit

[Bug tree-optimization/46315] [4.5 Regression] gcc-4.5.1 -O2 -fno-strict-overflow causes bad code generation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-05 16:47:12 UTC --- ipa-cp triggers this but is not neccessarily at fault. Workaround: -fno-ipa-cp.

[Bug tree-optimization/46315] [4.5 Regression] gcc-4.5.1 -O2 -fno-strict-overflow causes bad code generation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 Summary: [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assign

[Bug bootstrap/44756] [meta-bug] --enable-werror-always issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756 --- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-05 16:27:37 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Fri Nov 5 16:27:25 2010 New Revision: 166366 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166366 Log: PR bootstrap/44756 * expr.c (can

[Bug c/46315] New: gcc-4.5.1 -O2 -fno-strict-overflow causes bad code generation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315 Summary: gcc-4.5.1 -O2 -fno-strict-overflow causes bad code generation Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 16:26:44 UTC --- On trunk, it was fixed by revision 163123: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00334.html

[Bug fortran/46313] [OOP] OOP-ABI issue, ALLOCATE issue, CLASS renaming issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl 2010-11-05 16:04:31 UTC --- On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:46:14PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > -fdump-parse-tree suggests that the parsing of class(t2) :: b1, b2 > is not picking up the renamed type. >

[Bug fortran/46313] [OOP] OOP-ABI issue, ALLOCATE issue, CLASS renaming issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314 --- Comment #5 from bero at arklinux dot org 2010-11-05 15:30:20 UTC --- Still happens on current 4.5 branch

[Bug middle-end/46314] New: frontends use ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46314 Summary: frontends use ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: una

[Bug c++/46160] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE with volatile structure and enum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/46244] gfc_compare_derived_types is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/46313] New: [OOP] OOP-ABI issue, ALLOCATE issue, CLASS renaming issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46313 Summary: [OOP] OOP-ABI issue, ALLOCATE issue, CLASS renaming issue Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/46244] gfc_compare_derived_types is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bur...@net-b.de, pault at

[Bug c/44772] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -Wc++-compat warns incorrectly for anonymous unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-05 13:53:26 UTC --- Created attachment 22292 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22292 gcc46-pr44472.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/44772] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -Wc++-compat warns incorrectly for anonymous unions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug bootstrap/44756] [meta-bug] --enable-werror-always issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756 --- Comment #6 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-05 13:27:29 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Fri Nov 5 13:27:23 2010 New Revision: 166360 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166360 Log: PR bootstrap/44756 * expr.c (emi

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/45894] [4.5/4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: segmentation fault with -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/46238] [4.6 Regression] s390x bootstrap problem: wrong code generated in cfgcleanup/crossjumping

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/45314] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: error: in remove_unreachable_handlers, at tree-sh.c:3294 with -O2 -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fa

[Bug libstdc++/46303] 'mutex' is not a member of 'std' failures in 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc, 30_threads/mutex/cons/constexpr.cc, 30_threads/once_flag/cons/constexpr.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45865] [4.6 Regression] ifcvt/crossjump failed to mark return jump

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46312] gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-11-05 11:43:48 UTC --- On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/46312] gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 --- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-11-05 11:41:40 UTC --- > --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-05 > 11:29:41 UTC --- > Hm, of course.  Does adding > > /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */ > > make it unsupported

[Bug tree-optimization/46312] gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug tree-optimization/46099] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in replace_ssa_name, at tree-cfg.c:5643 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46099 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress

[Bug middle-end/43690] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Internal compiler error detected by avr-gcc.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6

[Bug tree-optimization/46312] gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/44750] pdp-11 fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44750 --- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-05 11:27:19 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Fri Nov 5 11:27:16 2010 New Revision: 166356 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166356 Log: PR target/44750 * confi

[Bug tree-optimization/46312] New: gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 Summary: gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assi

  1   2   >