http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46320
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++ |libstdc++ Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-05 17:46:47 UTC --- No it shouldn't, basic_string::at throws, basic_string::operator[] doesn't