http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46320

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
          Component|c++                         |libstdc++
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-05 
17:46:47 UTC ---
No it shouldn't, basic_string::at throws, basic_string::operator[] doesn't

Reply via email to