--- Comment #10 from elizabeth dot l dot yip at boeing dot com 2007-05-15
07:48 ---
The following code exposes the problem relating to conjg(transpose(.)), with
which gfortran returns the wrong answer. If we break conjg(transpose(.)) into
two lines, then we can get the right answer.
I
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-15 06:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13556)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13556&action=view)
Log of testsuite failures on Cygwin - 1,000 KB
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31928
I compiled gcc with java as one of the languages,
--enable-languages=...,java,...
$xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-cygwin
Configured with: /cygdrive/C/makecygwin/gcc-4_2-branch/configure --verbose
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,java,objc,obj-c++ --with-tune=athlon-xp
--prefix=/
--- Comment #1 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-15 05:54 ---
I did some hacking to push the make through and find all occurances of the
problem, then I rebuild from a fresh directory and condensed my changes.
It came down to a few problems all interacting together - changes and upda
--- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-05-15 05:29 ---
Thanks. If someone with write-access runs the script and tosses the result into
the SVN I'll consider this bug resolved (for me). I changed severity to minor.
The maintainers _might_ want to update the "Makefile maintainer
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 03:38
---
I think the correct place to fix this is in trim. The uninitialized variable
is being passed to the library from trim. Looking at the fdump-tree-original,
you can see that the variable ch is initialized by setti
--- Comment #27 from blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it 2007-05-15 02:36
---
What about actually doing as suggested comment #8? I.e. adding a nice error
message rather than an ICE?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
--- Comment #46 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 01:35 ---
I've been looking at this again recently. I have a patch that changes dg-error
and dg-warning only for languages that define gcc_error_prefix and
gcc_warning_prefix. I have tested it with C and ensured that tests fo
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-15 00:43 ---
Subject: Bug 31924
Author: janis
Date: Mon May 14 23:43:07 2007
New Revision: 124730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124730
Log:
libcpp/
PR c/31924
* expr.c (interpret_float_suff
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 23:23 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31926
--- Comment #7 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-14 23:11
---
4.2 (RC2, 20070430) also explodes (OOM) with the test case, using -O2.
whereas 4.0.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin8) peaks out at 280 MB (cc1plus), which is
reasonable and typical.
Flag as 4.1/4.2/4.3 regression?
--
--- Comment #68 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-05-14 22:49
---
Audit trail shows that this isn't a problem with 4.2. Target -> 4.1.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071
--- Comment #68 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:39
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] placement new does not change the
dynamic type as it should
On 14 May 2007 21:35:58 -, ian at airs dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #67 from i
--- Comment #27 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-14 22:39 ---
Ok, fixed the target milestone.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29496
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29496
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286
--- Comment #67 from ian at airs dot com 2007-05-14 22:35 ---
The patch in comment #65 passes bootstrap and the gcc and libstdc++-v3
testsuites on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #26 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-14 22:30 ---
Actually, this is already fixed for 4.2.0! How to mark it as such?
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #33 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #48 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:26
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #37 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #67 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #28 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #23 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #24 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #26 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #66 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:25
---
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-05-14 22:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13555)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13555&action=view)
preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31926
svn Revision: 124725
-
$ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..-mno-cygwin -mdll -mthreads -DNDEBUG -UDEBUG
-DWIN32 -D_WIN32 -DCONFIG_GPL -O4 -march=i686 -mtune=i686 -mssse3 -fomit-frame-
pointer -finline-functions -finline -fren
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:06 ---
Well 2.95.4 is almost 6 years old and is no longer being maintained and has not
for at least 5 years. Since you already mention this is fixed 3.3.5 I am going
to close as being fixed there. Also note any release be
--- Comment #2 from mkgnu at mkgnu dot net 2007-05-14 22:05 ---
Output of gcc -v
$ gcc -v -O3 -c bm_kiss_double.cil.i
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/cc1 bm_kiss_double.cil.i
--- Comment #1 from mkgnu at mkgnu dot net 2007-05-14 22:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=13554)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13554&action=view)
Source code that causes an internal compiler error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31925
Internal compiler error in `store_bit_field', at expmed.c:277.
It seems that I've come across a case where compiling with gcc 2.95.4 (from the
Debian package 2.95.4-22) using -O3 crashes, while compiling with no
optimization does not crash.
I will attach the .i file produced with -save-temps. I'm
The change to the C preprocessor to recognize "df", "dd", and "dl" as suffixes
for decimal floating point constants also allows "fd" and "ld"; a check for
that assumed that the the letters are examined from left to right, but they are
examined from right to left. There are no errors for the follow
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-14 21:22 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 21:21 ---
Subject: Bug 29928
Author: paolo
Date: Mon May 14 20:21:34 2007
New Revision: 124724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124724
Log:
/cp
2007-05-14 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c+
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-14 21:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 31915
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00907.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:57 ---
It is easy to forget to update this file, I'm sure that is what happened.
This only matters if you have CNI code that uses one of these classes.
So, it is definitely a problem, but generally not a very serious one.
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:51 ---
The patch below works and regtests OK. I am not convince that this is the
whole story and need to think about it for a day or two.
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
==
The following test program compiles without error or warning on g++ (versions
2.95.3, 3.4.5, 4.0.2, 4.1.0, 4.1.1, and 4.3-20070323):
template
static void F();
template<>
static void F(); // Explicit specialization with storage class specifier
The C++ standard seems to disallow this. From 7.1.1
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:34
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:34
---
Subject: Bug 30723
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon May 14 19:33:57 2007
New Revision: 124721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124721
Log:
PR fortran/30723
* trans.h (gfor_fndecl_
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.3.0 4.2.0 4.1.2 |4.2.0 4.1.2
Known to work||4.3.0
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:29
---
Subject: Bug 31725
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon May 14 19:29:33 2007
New Revision: 124720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124720
Log:
PR fortran/31725
* trans-expr.c (gfc_co
--- Comment #25 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:01
---
> which should be the most interesting parts of the diff (apart from the
> extra vops that prevent the DCE).
>
> Danny? Any hints on what can go wrong here?
>
The first pass is obviously generating wrong answe
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:24 ---
Jerry, you are one of the libgfortran/IO experts, could you have a look?
_gfortran_transfer_character (&dt_parm.0, pstr.1, len.2);
uses uninitialized memory if len = 0 and p = NULL. This happens because
empty_str
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:06 ---
*** Bug 31921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 20:06 ---
I believe this is a duplicate of PR 31692 which was fixed Tue May 8, which
explains that it is failing in 20070506 but working in 20070511.
Please reopen if there are other issues.
*** This bug has been marked as a
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-14 20:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31917
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00900.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #17 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-05-14 20:02 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> So, i gave it the old college try, and it turns out to be much harder
> than I expected because of mem-ssa and other changes that went into
> 4.3
yup, looks like a nice bullet for 4.2.0 release.
--- Comment #34 from amylaar at spamcop dot net 2007-05-14 19:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] FAIL:
27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test
Quoting pcarlini at suse dot de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now, the strange thing is that, before these two
program x
implicit none
character(20) :: ch
ch = ' '
print '(a)', trim(ch)
end program x
valgrind:
==23260== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==23260==at 0x4EBD506: formatted_transfer_scalar (transfer.c:888)
==23260==by 0x4EBDFCC: formatted_transfer (trans
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
