[Bug rtl-optimization/20117] [4.0 Regression] duplicated labels in PIC

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 07:13 --- Subject: Bug 20117 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 07:13:26 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog bb-reorder.c Log message:

[Bug c++/18384] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 06:49 --- The trunk version of the patch works (I have it in my local tree for ages), it hasn't been applied because of http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01976.html but as seen in the thread after that there

[Bug target/20203] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn building binutils

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |amodra at bigpond dot net |dot org |dot au Status|NEW

[Bug c++/18384] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 06:39 --- Jakub, any plans to commit your patch to mainline and 3.3? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18384

[Bug c++/20186] [4.0 regression] ICE on boost-1.32 with latest cvs

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 06:17 --- Hmm, this is a really new bug as it works with 20050218. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20186

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] asm and memory operands does not add a V_MAY_DEF

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 06:08 --- The obvious problem is that a tree_list is not an expression. Changing: if (lhs && EXPR_P (lhs)) to if (lhs) (Likewise for rhs) Fixes the problem but it looks like it can have other effects whic

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] asm and memory operands does not add a V_MAY_DEF

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 05:15 --- I think the patch for PR 19633 caused this bug. For the code below which is just a modifed version: void link_error(); struct aa { char a[10]; }; void f(char *a) { struct aa *a1 = (struct aa *)a; if (*

[Bug c++/19797] [4.0 Regression] g++.dg/abi/inline1.C fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-02-25 04:37 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] g++.dg/abi/inline1.C fails on hp > It builds successfully on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. There seem to be some > regression in the gfortran suite but none elsewhere. I don'

[Bug ada/19519] GNAT Bug Box when reading a program with UTF-8 encoded enumeration literals

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-

[Bug ada/18858] ACATS ICE ce2109b ce2404b ce2410b at -O0: in expand_assignment, at expr.c:3756

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 03:51 --- +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20050225 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: | | in expand_assignment, at expr.c:3811

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] asm and memory operands does not add a V_MAY_DEF

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 03:30 --- (In reply to comment #9) > But I should note that this seems to violate aliasing rules but that should > not matter for -fno-strict- > aliasing. Someone should tell glibc if this turns out being violating

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] asm and memory operands does not add a V_MAY_DEF

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 03:27 --- Hmm, this is the smallest testcase which I came up to show the problem (note I cannot think of a testcase which shows this in dejagnu test well we could check for V_MAY_DEF): void link_error(); void f(char

[Bug target/20203] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn building binutils

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 02:57 --- This worked with 20041104 and 20041214's 4.0 so this is a new regression. Before (in 20041214), we did the load the following way: (insn 12 10 13 1 (set (reg:SI 122) (mem/s/j:SI (reg/v/f:SI 119 [ s

[Bug target/20203] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn building binutils

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 02:48 --- Note this is very hard to get a testcase which fails before 4.0 but that is because we would remove the cast to "long long" as fold removes it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20203

[Bug ada/18844] GNAT ASIS is not included in the gcc-ada distribution.

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 02:41 --- This is not a bug. ASIS is a separate project from the Ada front end. There is enough work to be done getting Ada itself in good shape. Even when Ada is in good shape, it makes most sense for ASIS to remai

[Bug ada/19048] Assertion failure on illegal program

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 02:33 --- Works in 4.0.0: foo.ads:5:04: type does not match declaration at line 4 -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/20127] [4.0 Regression] wrong code for volatile struct members

--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-25 02:06 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] wrong code for volatile struct members Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:57 > --- > Fixed. > > -- Thank you. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug rtl-optimization/16152] perl-5.8.4 fails to build using gcc-3.3.4 on {ia64,arm,m68k}-linux

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 02:04 --- It's hard to be completely sure what's wrong here, but something *very* suspcision appears near original source line 2669. The good code (on ARM) contains: .L1706: .LBB453: ldr r3, [r6, #4] .LB

[Bug tree-optimization/20127] [4.0 Regression] wrong code for volatile struct members

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:57 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/20127] [4.0 Regression] wrong code for volatile struct members

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:56 --- Subject: Bug 20127 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 01:56:18 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-sra.c Log message:

[Bug rtl-optimization/16152] perl-5.8.4 fails to build using gcc-3.3.4 on {ia64,arm,m68k}-linux

-- What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/16152] perl-5.8.4 fails to build using gcc-3.3.4 on {ia64,arm,m68k}-linux

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:50 --- Created an attachment (id=8281) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8281&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16152

[Bug target/16152] perl-5.8.4 fails to build using gcc-3.3.4 on {ia64,arm,m68k}-linux

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:49 --- I've just reproduced this on arm-netbsdelf using gcc-3.3.3. I've managed to track it down to a miscompilation of pp_hot.c, and the key flag seems to be -fcse-skip-blocks (-O2 -fno-cse-skip-blocks is OK, -O

[Bug target/20203] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn building binutils

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:49 --- Werid it does not ICE with my tree combiner, but that is because we remove the cast to "long long". I think there is expand problem but I could be wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug target/20203] [4.0 Regression] unrecognizable insn building binutils

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:41 --- Confirmed, also fails on ppc-darwin. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug debug/19345] [4.0 Regression] Segmentation fault with VLA and inlining and dwarf2

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:38 --- *** Bug 20205 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/20205] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while compiling glibc 2.3.4

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:38 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19345 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:37 --- (In reply to comment #7) With that I got it down to 1646 lines and only one function (well the other stuff is functions and some unused stuff). I will attach a more reduced testcase when I get around to i

[Bug tree-optimization/20204] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-02-25 01:21 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > I can certainly understand that a typo changed some assigmnent such that > asm-declared registers are

[Bug tree-optimization/20204] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:12 --- Well, I can't follow the code, but here are all the gcc changes in that time-frame: diff -p -c -r2.7576 -r2.7578 *** ChangeLog 24 Feb 2005 01:54:58 - 2.7576 --- ChangeLog 24 Feb 2005 14:17:25 -

[Bug tree-optimization/20204] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-02-25 01:05 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers hp at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 00:59 > --- > I forgot to

[Bug c/20205] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while compiling glibc 2.3.4

--- Additional Comments From bero at arklinux dot org 2005-02-25 01:02 --- Triggered by -finline-functions -O2: works -O3: broken -O2 -finline-functions: broken -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20205

[Bug tree-optimization/20204] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 01:00 --- I also forgot to mention that this was observed with -O2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20204

[Bug c/20205] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while compiling glibc 2.3.4

--- Additional Comments From bero at arklinux dot org 2005-02-25 01:00 --- Created an attachment (id=8280) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8280&action=view) Preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20205

[Bug tree-optimization/20204] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25 00:59 --- I forgot to mention that this is the only suspect patch in this time-frame: + 2005-02-24 Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * tree-into-ssa.c: Re-organize internal functions. + + -- http://gcc.gnu

[Bug c/20205] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while compiling glibc 2.3.4

gcc ../sysdeps/i386/i486/string-inlines.c -c -std=gnu99 -DNDEBUG=1 -O3 -Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -freorder-blocks -g -march=athlon -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -I../include -I. -I/usr/src/ark/BUILD/glibc-2.3.4/build-athlon-linux/string -I.. -I../libio -I../nptl -I/u

[Bug tree-optimization/20204] New: [4.0 regression] miscompilation of asm-declared registers

Between LAST_UPDATED: "Thu Feb 24 08:05:18 UTC 2005" and "Thu Feb 24 14:59:24 UTC 2005" I see lots of testsuite regressions. For GCC, they are (as per Mike Stump's script): Tests that now fail, but worked before: 21_strings/basic_string/insert/char/2.cc execution test 21_strings/basic_string/rep

[Bug target/20203] unrecognizable insn building binutils

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work||3.4.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug target/20203] unrecognizable insn building binutils

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-02-25 00:48 --- Created an attachment (id=8279) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8279&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20203

[Bug target/20203] New: unrecognizable insn building binutils

The attached testcase distilled from elfxx-mips.c gives an ICE with -O1 and above. /src/tmp/mips_miscompile.i:16: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn:HI 12 14 13 0 (set (subreg:SI (reg:DI 120) 4) (plus:SI (mem/s:SI (reg/v/f:SI 119 [ s ]) [4 .size+0 S4 A32]) (const_int -16 [0x

[Bug inline-asm/20202] asm("movq %0, %mm0" : : "X"(*a)) generates invalid asm code

--- Additional Comments From bero at arklinux dot org 2005-02-25 00:30 --- [tested with CVS snapshot as of 2005/02/25 00:05:00 GMT] -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20202

[Bug inline-asm/20202] New: asm("movq %0, %mm0" : : "X"(*a)) generates invalid asm code

Compiling the following code results in invalid asm: #include typedef union { int64_t q; } __attribute__ ((aligned (8))) mmx_t; int main(int argc, char **argv) { mmx_t a; mmx_t *b=&a; __asm__ __volatile__("movq %0, %%mm0" : : "X" (*b));/

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

--- Additional Comments From davids at webmaster dot com 2005-02-24 23:45 --- > The difference is that almost all uses of strchr are done on data > which is not shared between threads, while many static local > initializers are used on objects which are accessed from multiple > threads (

[Bug c++/19797] [4.0 Regression] g++.dg/abi/inline1.C fails on hppa*-*-hpux*

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 23:49 --- Even with the patch 2005-02-20 John David Anglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * pa.c (pa_assemble_integer, get_plabel): Small cleanups. (pa_asm_output_mi_thunk): Use asm_output_insn instead of fprin

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-24 23:44 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I have no idea what is going on here but I will note that "-O3 -fno-tree-dominator-opts" works. > "-O3 -fno-ivopts" does not work > "-O3 -fno-strict-aliasing" does not work. I'v

[Bug libgcj/20160] [4.0 Regression] link errors building libgcj tests

--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:55 --- A short-term, simpler solution that might be more suitable for the GCC 4 time-frame is to create one convenience archives per subdir, so as to make sure we don't have any overlapping basenames within a single

[Bug libgcj/20160] [4.0 Regression] link errors building libgcj tests

--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:51 --- Technically, it's not a libtool bug. When you create an archive out of object files that have overlapping basenames, ar will generally only retain the last one. Dropping the dirname portion is mandated by P

[Bug ada/19587] Unnecessary warning for class-wide out parameters

--- Additional Comments From fw at deneb dot enyo dot de 2005-02-24 22:45 --- But the type conversion is a view conversion, so the operand is not actually evaluated. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19587

[Bug ada/13370] 'constant String' with 'pragma Machine_Attribute' triggers ICE

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:42 --- +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20050221 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0) Bus error | | Error detected at gimme_bug_box.adb:3:4

[Bug ada/12888] ada can't open files larger than 2**31 - 1 byte

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:40 --- It is OK for an Ada implementation to have capacity limits. In this case the limits are caused by the underlying OS, the corresponding C library functions have the same limitation. Indeed, it would be nice

[Bug target/19683] MIPS wrong-code for 64-bit multiply.

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2005-02-24 22:37 --- Subject: Re: MIPS wrong-code for 64-bit multiply. David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you think that patch can/should be backported to 3.3.x and 3.4.x? If it works. ;) I think it's one of those that

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

--- Additional Comments From qrczak at knm dot org dot pl 2005-02-24 22:37 --- > By your definition of MT-safe, almost no function is MT-safe. Is 'strchr' > MT-safe if you call it on a string while another function might modify that > string? No, so lets put automatic locks around 'strch

[Bug ada/19587] Unnecessary warning for class-wide out parameters

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:31 --- The type conversion to Foo_Real constitutes a read of F, which, being an out-parameter, is by definition is not initialized. The warning is correct. -Geert -- What|Removed

[Bug target/14619] Incorrect Dwarf 2 information in function prologue

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:26 --- Partial fix committed, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01546.html>. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14619

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

--- Additional Comments From davids at webmaster dot com 2005-02-24 22:22 --- > They are non-portable no matter how static initializers are done: > C++ doesn't include threads and POSIX doesn't include C++. That's a bogus argument. There are no conflicts between the two standards. > T

[Bug target/14619] Incorrect Dwarf 2 information in function prologue

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:17 --- Subject: Bug 14619 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 22:17:43 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/cris: c

[Bug libgcj/20160] [4.0 Regression] link errors building libgcj tests

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:15 --- Yet another libtool bug. It has clobbered ./java/lang/StringBuffer.o with ./gnu/gcj/runtime/StringBuffer.o when moving data from the convenience library to the main library. I fear we may be screwed, with no

[Bug c++/20164] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong line number in diagnostic with gcc 4.0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:02 --- Hmm, with my example in comment #5, this is a regression from 2.95.3 and not from 3.4.0, I should have really tested it before saying what I thought cause the regression. The patch which I am thinking cau

[Bug libgcj/20160] [4.0 Regression] link errors building libgcj tests

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 22:01 --- Verified on i686-linux with --disable-shared. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassign

[Bug tree-optimization/20127] [4.0 Regression] wrong code for volatile struct members

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug target/15184] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Direct access to byte inside word not working with -march=pentiumpro

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184

[Bug c++/20175] [3.4 Regression] Warnings are issued when initializing struct members with "strings"

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:48 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Known to work|

[Bug target/19019] GCC ldouble format incompatibility with XLC long double

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:33 --- Subject: Bug 19019 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 21:33:05 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog mklibgcc.in gcc/co

[Bug ada/15977] Ada contributors should be documented

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:28 --- Below is the list of people who made more than 15 check ins for files currently part of GNAT over the lifetime of the project since it originally started at NYU. This is a one-time generated list. I verifie

[Bug target/20196] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of mem_init in 32-bit ppc linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:24 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/20196] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of mem_init in 32-bit ppc linux kernel

: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000: rs6000.md Added files: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute: 20050224-1.c Log message: PR target/20196 * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (LTU, GTU sCC splitters): Add earlyclobber, allow splitting only if operands 0 and 3 don't ov

[Bug c++/20175] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Warnings are issued when initializing struct members with "strings"

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:21 --- Subject: Bug 20175 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 21:21:28 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite : C

[Bug libstdc++/10606] uncaught_exception() returns false too early

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 21:19 --- You mean different from gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/uncaught1.C? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10606

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

--- Additional Comments From qrczak at knm dot org dot pl 2005-02-24 21:06 --- > First, if we're talking about pthreads programs, which is the only case I'm > suggesting removing the locking for, then those programs are already broken. They are non-portable no matter how static initiali

[Bug libstdc++/10606] uncaught_exception() returns false too early

--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 20:49 --- I'd like to add a testcase for this, based on the mailing list commentary here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-01/msg00035.html Although I suppse the 475 wording would also be sufficient. Thoughts? I

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 20:45 --- I have no idea what is going on here but I will note that "-O3 -fno-tree-dominator-opts" works. "-O3 -fno-ivopts" does not work "-O3 -fno-strict-aliasing" does not work. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug c++/20099] -pthreads should imply -fno-threadsafe-statics

--- Additional Comments From davids at webmaster dot com 2005-02-24 20:42 --- >The only thing which would change when you remove the automatically >inserted locking is that some programs which used to work are now >broken, and that some other programs which used to deadlock now >invoke u

[Bug libffi/20104] gij fails on ppc and not on x86

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-02-24 20:40 --- This is fixed for me as of 20050223. Changing to FIXED. -- What|Removed |Added Stat

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

-- What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20188

[Bug rtl-optimization/19627] if-conversion2 generates wrong code / crash on SH4

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 20:31 --- A patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01280.html -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/20201] New: requesting -Wfatal-errors=n

Currently, -Wfatal-errors stops error reporting after the first message. However, often with templatized code especially, you'd like say two or three error messages, but not the whole book. I would find this functionality useful. This was suggested here by Jim Wilson: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/20

[Bug middle-end/20188] [4.0 Regression] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 20:08 --- I can confirm this, looking to reduce this a little more. -- What|Removed |Added Co

[Bug middle-end/18902] Naive (default) complex division algorithm

-- Bug 18902 depends on bug 19953, which changed state. Bug 19953 Summary: Special-case real + complex arithmetic operation (-ffast-math) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19953 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug middle-end/19953] Special-case real + complex arithmetic operation (-ffast-math)

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 20:04 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/20200] typeid/demangle for multidimensional array returns wrong name

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 20:01 --- The demangler is wrong which by the way has been fixed in 3.4.0. With a newer demangler I get: int [3][2] -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/19953] Special-case real + complex arithmetic operation (-ffast-math)

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 20:00 --- Subject: Bug 19953 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-24 20:00:09 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog builtins.c fold-const.c tre

[Bug c++/20200] typeid/demangle for multidimensional array returns wrong name

--- Additional Comments From jody-atd-030903 at atdesk dot com 2005-02-24 19:59 --- Created an attachment (id=8275) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8275&action=view) stdout/stderr from running gcc -v -save-temps b.cpp > OUT 2>&1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug c++/20200] typeid/demangle for multidimensional array returns wrong name

--- Additional Comments From jody-atd-030903 at atdesk dot com 2005-02-24 19:58 --- Created an attachment (id=8274) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8274&action=view) Preprocessed output (result of gcc -v -save-temps b.cpp) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug c++/20200] typeid/demangle for multidimensional array returns wrong name

--- Additional Comments From jody-atd-030903 at atdesk dot com 2005-02-24 19:57 --- Created an attachment (id=8273) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8273&action=view) Test program -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20200

[Bug c++/20200] New: typeid/demangle for multidimensional array returns wrong name

Calling typeid(int[3][2]).name() returns the string "A3_A2_i" which I think is correct (though I am unfamiliar with all the mangling rules). However, demangling this name returns "int[2][3]" so either the typeid().name() string is wrong, or the demangled name is wrong. Same behavior on 3.2 and 3.

[Bug other/20188] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-24 19:40 --- -O3 break zic. # log: bash -v build.sh #!/bin/sh rm -rf Asia Mideast zic *.o gcc -o zic zic.i ialloc.c scheck.c -DNOID -Wall -O2 ./zic -d ./ -L /dev/null -y ./yearistype solar87 && echo "ok" ok rm -

[Bug other/20188] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-24 19:38 --- Created an attachment (id=8272) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8272&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20188

[Bug c++/20123] mangled name of typeid doesn't encode cv-qualifer.

--- Additional Comments From jody-atd-030903 at atdesk dot com 2005-02-24 19:33 --- I am not on the gcc team, so feel free to take this with some reservation. According to 5.2.8.5, the top-level cv-qualifier are stripped when calling typeid(). According to 3.9.3.[2,5], cv-qualifiers a

[Bug ada/20035] failed run-time assertion : Tasking not implemented on this configuration on sparc-linux

--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-02-24 19:19 --- ok, let me place this as a enhancement then. I hope to see this happening with the help of phython... -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/20199] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 19:00 --- I think this is the same as PR 19664. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20199

[Bug rtl-optimization/19627] if-conversion2 generates wrong code / crash on SH4

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 18:56 --- 3.4.4 20050125 shows the problem. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/20199] New: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden broken on powerpc64-linux

The C++ option -fvisibility-inlines-hidden doesn't work on powerpc64-linux. I don't understand the problem well enough to describe it well or to provide a small test case that doesn't depend on using libstdc++. The problem shows up with anything that uses , and also with the test g++.old-deja/g++.

[Bug ada/19456] [4.0 regression] ada bootstrap failure on alpha-linux

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19456

[Bug rtl-optimization/19627] if-conversion2 generates wrong code / crash on SH4

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 18:44 --- STack management appears sane when using gcc 4.0.0 20050224 . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/19369] fatal error: file gnatbind.ali is incorrectly formatted

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 18:22 --- This can only happen if gnatbind tries to bind a file compiled with a different version of the compiler. Doing so is an error as it could lead to inconsistency, which why the error message is given. As many

[Bug ada/18099] Incorrect rounding from floating point to integer

--- Additional Comments From bosch at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 18:12 --- The fix for this is now in GCC 4.0.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libgcj/20198] New: java.security.CodeSource.getLocation output is different than expected

GCJ version: % gij4 --version gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.0.0 20050217 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.27) Test class: public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(Test.class.getProtectionDomain(). getCodeSource().getLocation());

[Bug target/20196] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of mem_init in 32-bit ppc linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 17:54 --- Patch here: -- What|Removed |Added

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24 17:49 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at

[Bug libfortran/20124] gfortran prints -.01 incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-02-24 17:38 --- Patch proposed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-02/msg00315.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20124

  1   2   >