------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24
22:02 -------
Hmm, with my example in comment #5, this is a regression from 2.95.3 and not
from 3.4.0, I should
have really tested it before saying what I thought cause the regression.
The patch which I am thinking caused this regression now is:
2000-04-08 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* cp-tree.h (cp_tree_index): Add CPTI_COMPLETE_CTOR_IDENTIFIER.
(complete_ctor_identifier): New macro.
(special_function_kind): Add sfk_copy_constructor and
sfk_assignment_operator.
It is not setting the locus correctly on the body of the functions.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |3.3.3 3.4.0 4.0.0
Known to work| |2.95.3
Summary|[4.0 Regression] Wrong line |[3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression]
|number in diagnostic with |Wrong line number in
|gcc 4.0 |diagnostic with gcc 4.0
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |3.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20164
