Polizeiexperten warnen: Ethnisch abgeschottete Mafia-Clans sind kaum noch zu
durchdringen. Die Gerichte tragen Mitschuld.
Weiter auf:
http://www.libasoli.de/2004/ethnoclans%20spiegel50_04.html
Hello all,
Dorit Nuzman and I have been collaborating on a plan for a cost model
for the vectorizer. Included below is an overview of the design for
the initial implementation. We would welcome any input those of you
on the list might have.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Dorit and Tony
Tony Mueller would like to recall the message, "".
Hello All,
I applied the recent patches to the 7/23 snapshot, and am still seeing
some 387 to sse moves. In particular, in SpecFP's 177.mesa (matrix.c),
I'm seeing fld1's feeding moves to sse registers.
Compiled via: gcc -O3 -march=k8 -mfpmath=sse matrix.c
Thanks.
Tony
>> Could someone with the powers please modify my permissions to the above?
>
> I will do that if a gcc maintainer vouches for you.
For the record, this situation has now been resolved and I can edit
the bugs as requested.
Many thanks,
Tony
added to?
Thanks,
Tony
e as to their setup and
usage, to make the results easily repeatable
Out of interest, has their been much communication in the past between
GCC and Phoronix to address any of these issues in their previous
benchmarks?
Tony
har**)’:
main.cpp:19: warning: conversion to ‘int32_t’ from ‘uint64_t’ may
alter its value
still that operation will generate the output I expect.
Is there some strange casting rule that I'm not following properly?
cheers,
Tony
uot; stand for?
Thanks a lot!
Tony.
ule it to be fixed in 4.6.0?
4. In general, who is responsible for setting the target release field?
5. Similarly, if I mark a bug as known to work in 4.5.2, will this
lead to it eventually being closed?
Thanks,
Tony
t, then should it be marked as
NEW, with a "Target Milestone" of 4.6.0, and the priority potentially
lowered to P4 or P5 (given it is rare and old)?
Regards,
Tony
necessary privileges. Could I please obtain a gcc email account?
Many thanks,
Tony
Thanks. Whilst I can see the change you made in my preferences
permissions screen, I don't seem to be able to edit any more of the
fields than I could before (I have logged out and back in again).
Tony
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at
fields
- transition a bug status from UNCONFIRMED to NEW
- change "Target Milestone"
- potentially change priority/severity
Could someone with the powers please modify my permissions to the above?
(as an aside, shouldn't modifying the "known to fail/work" fields be
enabled by default for all?)
Many thanks,
Tony
There's at least one easy answer in there:
> If implementations must support annotation, what form should that
annotation take? P0190R0 recommends the [[carries_dependency]]
attribute, but I am not picky as long as it can be (1) applied
to all relevant pointer-like object
de an answer to your question, please contact the GCC users'
help list; you can learn more about it at <http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html>.
I am sorry that I couldn't be of more help.
--
Tony Wieczorek
Program Assistant
(617) 542-5942
Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St. Fifth Floor
Boston, MA 02110 USA
16 matches
Mail list logo
