Hello people,
I tried to build and install gcc-4.2-20060805 snapshot.
First, I needed to add some initializers.
gcc seem to use -Werror at some stage and
"might be used uninitialized" warnings were terminating the build.
The patch is attached.
Then "make bootstrap" failed in a different way:
Th
Hi All.
Right now the AVR port have two maintainers Denis Chertykov
and Marek Michalkiewicz.
The AVR community ask me to add Anatoly Sokolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as avr
maintainer and Marek asked to remove him.
How to do that ?
Denis.
On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:34, Owen Lucas wrote:
>
> Im doing a program that reads in stuff from the serial port under linux.
> Once read in there is a bit of formatting and it then needs to get piped
> to something else. At the end is the cut down code.
>
> anyway the interesting part is in th
Consider the following example:
enum w {
//c=-1,
a,
b
};
whattodo (
char option
) {
static
struct todo {
enum w what;
char option;
} todos[]= {
{a,'a'},
{b,'b'},
{-1}
};
struct todo *p= todos;
do if (
(option
aints but only for specific
> registers. If you have 64 registers that will give you 22 pairs. I could, of
> course, create all of these by hand by defining 23 classes and define a
> single constraint that matches these classes but I would like to know if
> there's another way.
You can try to play with DImode register and two SImode subregs of it.
Denis.
Hello,
I've been trying to compile gcc 4.5.4 from the sources using
--with-fpmath=387 but I'm getting this error: "Invalid
--with-fpmath=387". I looked in the configs and found that it doesn't
support this option:
case ${with_fpmath} in
avx)
tm_file="${tm_file} i386/avxmath.h"
;;
sse)
Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Denis K wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been trying to compile gcc 4.5.4 from the sources using
>> --with-fpmath=387 but I'm getting this error: "Invalid
>> --with-fpmath=387". I looked in the confi
eading to a failure.
On 12 January 2014 15:50, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Denis K wrote:
>> My settings were taken from the comment here:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9450394/how-to-install-gcc-from-scratch-with-gmp-mpfr-mpc-elf-without-shared-lib
just apply it)
Denis.
2014-03-03 15:35 GMT+04:00 David Brown :
> On 02/03/14 19:24, Denis Chertykov wrote:
>> I would remove two maintainers for AVR port:
>> 1. Anatoly Sokolov
>> 2. Eric Weddington
>>
>> I have discussed the removal with Anatoly Sokolov and he is agree with it.
&g
2014-03-03 21:01 GMT+04:00 David Edelsohn :
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Denis Chertykov wrote:
>> 2014-03-03 15:35 GMT+04:00 David Brown :
>>> On 02/03/14 19:24, Denis Chertykov wrote:
>>>> I would remove two maintainers for AVR port:
>>>> 1
its on top of XP with always the latest cygwin packages
(including cygwin1.dll), and it worked perfectly for me (as worked the snapshots
i've tested before (20120526, 20120602) and after (20120609). I must however
confess that i use --disable-bootstrap and --enable-languages=c,c++ (because
otherwise it takes more than 26 hours to compile).
I also use --disable-sjlj-exceptions, but i suppose it has become the default
these days.
Hope this helps,
Denis Excoffier.
le (spill to stack slot) and
you have an insn
with address like [SP+0xff].
Denis.
and Z are base pointers.
Y is a frame pointer, so only one general base pointer - Z.
Offset also very limited -63 to +63.
In L_R_A I play with POINTER_REGS (X,Y,Z) and BASE_POINTER_REGS (Y,Z).
My experiments with reload show me that reload can't handle all
difficult situations.
Also, Jeff I know that you think that reload can.
GCC havn't something like (define_address ...) and reload can't handle
POINTER_REGS and
BASE_POINTER_REGS differently. In my version of L_R_A I tried to do it.
Denis.
2008/5/29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Again thank you and Denis for your comment.
>
> Here is what I deduce from code and Denis comments - I am sure he (and
> others) will correct me if wrong :-)
>
>
> The main issue is that we have one pointer register that cannot take off
Hi all
I am having problem starting my application that is successfully built. I am
using boost to serialize/deserialize data. I have link boost library and my
project is built successfully, but I cannot run it.
Running the project (build&go in xcode) I receive this error:
dyld: Library not loa
ake the whole GCC warning
mechanism less effective, and it diminishes the great effort that you GCC
developers put into helping developers write cleaner code.
Please make it simpler for the developers to write warning-free code!
Thanks,
Denis
-Original Message-
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pa
developers to easily handle any overreach
in the application of __wur (by merely "voiding" the func call)... that will
greatly diminish the adverse effect of the __wur overreachments.
Thanks,
Denis
-Original Message-
From: paolo.bonz...@gmail.com [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On
trust explicit
developer's void-casting.
Also, 'warn_unused_result' should be enough; there is no need to add more
levels to this simple paradigm.
Denis
reviewer still can see all such suppressed
warnings. So, the regular developers will be able to see the warnings -- and
either fix or easily suppress them. And the security (provided by the code
reviewer armed with that other flag/macro) won't be compromised.
Denis
Okay, I guess we 'll just disable the __wur's by default then -- as introducing
an unnecessary hard-to-avoid noise. I recon many other people do the same.
Thanks nevertheless. It's still a useful feature, just not flexible enough to
use it for *everyday* compilation.
Denis
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
