Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal

2007-07-07 Thread Rob1weld
>2007/4/10, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) >: >Following up on the recent discussion about GIMPLE tuples >(_http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg01126.html_ (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg01126.html) ), we have summarized >our main ideas and implementation p

Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal

2007-07-09 Thread Rob1weld
>In a message dated 7/7/2007 4:04:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Rob1weld writes: >This page http://deputy.cs.berkeley.edu/ has a link to this document http://hal.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/ >which describes a means to obtain three-address code here http://hal.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/ext.h

Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal

2007-07-10 Thread Rob1weld
>In a message dated 7/9/2007 2:37:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >On 7/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >In a message dated 7/7/2007 4:04:01 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, Rob1weld >> writes: >> >This page

Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal

2007-07-11 Thread Rob1weld
>On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >You haven't explained what advantages CIL's IR has over GIMPLE. >>I thought it was well explained on page: >>_http://hal.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/cil001.html_ (http://hal.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/cil00