Hi Everyone
This is my first post here.
I need help mapping a enjoyable workflow from GnuCOBOL to GCC.
I love COBOL and with GnuCOBOL, I can compile one of my programs to
intermediate C and then take the GnuCOBOL source code for the runtime
and the C outputted and hop around though it using c
On 2020-12-20 7:24 a.m., Arnaud Charlet wrote:
Pat,
Not sure what you are trying to do . Are you trying to generate C code
from Ada? If so, can you clarify why? In other words, what is the high level
problem you are trying to solve and that you'd like to achieve? Is it the
ability to navigate in
ly, I didn't understand what you meant by this,
> but I believe that I do now and thus I committed a fix for this problem
> two days ago.
I think he meant it has the wrong doctype. That is clearly an xhtml document,
but it has an html4 doctype.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarl
o be generated. Am I
missing an option or something?
Thanks,
Patrick
$ ~/usr/bin/gcc-4.0.0 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0.0/configure --program-suffix=-4.0.0
--prefix=/home/mitran/usr
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0
ur new Lefevrian overlords.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to
repetitive electronic music.&quo
On Saturday 18 June 2005 02:52 am, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Saying that the x86 processor is buggy is just completely silly.
> Only some gcc developers think so.
Yeah, the smart ones.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't affe
9915-86454580 ),
he's trying to raise $1,000 for melanoma research. All money donated goes
straight to the American Cancer Society.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'
On Monday 15 August 2005 06:37 pm, Vijaya Kishore Idimadakala wrote:
> Can anybody help?? Any tiny help is greatly
> appreciated.
This is a list for developers.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 12:58 pm, Niko Matsakis wrote:
> Indeed, I forgot that WikiName's must be MixedCase.
Also known as BumpyCaps. Today's useless fact was brought to you by the
letters A and K, and the number 47.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PRO
_ZN3Foo1bE, 4
_ZN3Foo1bE:
.long 2
.globl _ZN3Foo1aE
.align 4
.type _ZN3Foo1aE, @object
.size _ZN3Foo1aE, 4
_ZN3Foo1aE:
.long 1
Thanks,
Patrick Bennett
Hi everybody,
I am working on the intermediary tree representation of GCC right now
(writing a parser for it). I have a question regarding that.
If I declare a struct containing 2 fields like that in C:
struct foo {
int var_a;
char var_b;
} afoo;
afoo.var_a = 0;
afoo.var_b =
GCC 6, compared to GCC 5, now emits an extra newline between error
messages. Is this intended?
$ cat error.c
int x = a;
int y = b;
$ gcc-5 error.c
error.c:1:9: error: ‘a’ undeclared here (not in a function)
int x = a;
^
error.c:2:9: error: ‘b’ undeclared here (not in a function)
int y
I'm sad that this discussion died so soon without Antonio's points
being adequately addressed.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> I'm sad that this discussion died so soon without Antonio's points
>> being adequately addressed.
>
> But how do you want to address that?
Hi,
I'm running into a build problem when building GCC 6.1.0:
/home/patrick/src/e7/toolchain/build/gcc-6.1.0-stage2/./gcc/xgcc
-shared-libgcc
-B/home/patrick/src/e7/toolchain/build/gcc-6.1.0-stage2/./gcc
-nostdinc++
-L/home/patrick/src/e7/toolchain/build/gcc-6.1.0-stage2/powerpc-ea
The build step that invokes "ranlib libbackend.a" (which immediately
follows the invocation of "ar rc libbackend.a ...") takes over 7 seconds
on my machine and causes the entire 450MB archive to be rewritten. By
instead making the build system use ar rcs -- so that the archive and
its index are bu
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Andrew Pinski writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>> The build step that invokes "ranlib libbackend.a" (which immediately
>>> follows the invocation of "ar rc l
on of options gcc uses an incompatible
libgcc which includes spe instructions.
I have attached a patch which enables the "-mno-spe -mabi=no-spe" multilib.
It seems a bit broken that gcc would use an spe version of libgcc when I
specify "no-spe".
Hopefully someone finds the
many as one can over the summer.
Would any of these ideas work as a GSoC project?
Regards,
Patrick Palka
[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=search;s=ppalka;st=author
[2]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72443#c2
[3]: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762#c7
[4]: ht
e of
> > the frustrations for users who run into false positives with "late"
> > warnings like -Wstringop-overflow or -Wformat-overflow.
Thank you Martin for bringing this up!
>
> A similar issue is they are not carried along from compile-time to
> LTO link tim
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 5:16 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 3/3/19 4:06 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am very interested in working on GCC as part of GSoC this year. A few
> > years
> > ago I was a somewhat active code contributor[1] and unf
P APU still be supported?
Kind regards,
Patrick
emperature ratings required for some automotive (engine bay
or on engine) installations.
Of course these things can be overcome, but it will take time and effort.
Patrick
st want to point out that BUILT_IN_TM_START is missing in this
switch/case but I think I figure out why it is ok to not have it (except
in the case of nested transactions).
Thanks in advance for your time,
Patrick Marlier.
Inde
On 02/15/2011 05:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/15/2011 12:35 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
When I was looking at this problem of tail call optimization, I have
found that _ITM_abortTransaction was not considered as a 'noreturn'
function. Do you have any reason not doing this?
and feel free to ask questions.
Patrick Marlier.
nstrumentedCode,&txn_start_loc);
>> ++ .
>> ++_ITM_transactionId cur_id = _ITM_getTransactionId();
I do not understand that...
>> ++ Of course , It would be great to share the study and results with
>> you when I organize my study and all other things.
I guess we will meet together at the EuroTM meeting in Paris.
Patrick Marlier.
n handler which does not ---have explicit
---descriptor where another function needs transaction ---descriptor as
---a parameter.
Hummm... which one has explicit tx descriptor?
All ITM functions are using implicit transaction descriptor as far as I
remember, otherwise it is a bit odd.
Patrick.
sage could help. Do not hesitate to complete the list (I
can try to have a look at it) or close bugs (I cannot do it).
I take the opportunity of this message to thank Richard, Aldy and
Torvald for the work done on trans-mem.
Patrick Marlier.
t on those targets
perhaps?
Thanks Jack! You are true. I just paid attention to those failures (I
though it was fixed). Some may be due to Darwin or x86_64, I only get
memcpy/memset failures.
Patrick.
he tm testcase
should show the problem.
Please, can you (and maybe someone else) confirm that I am not the only
one to see that?
(Note I have started a thread here about that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01221.html)
Patrick.
ppens?
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
was fixed.
Thanks!
--
Patrick Marlier.
Index: trans-mem.c
===
--- trans-mem.c (rev
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
was fixed.
What do you mean? Do you still see
9.html
-> Solaris: ?.
--
Patrick Marlier
On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
On 01/09/2012 04:19 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
it should be done.
Thanks.
--
Patrick.
renamed to simply itm.h?
Thanks!
--
Patrick Marlier.
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Joshua Haberman wrote:
... elision by patrick of part of a quote of 6.5 Expressions #7...
* an aggregate or union type that includes one of the aforementioned
types among its members (including, recursively, a member of a
get
complained about by 4.4.1 or 4.5.0 at least.
#include
union u { int x; };
void
foo(union u theu)
{
printf("%d\n",theu.x);
}
int main()
{
int i=7;
foo(*((union u*)&i));
return 0;
}
Patrick
/n1422.pdf
I've read these, and while they deal with the same section of the
standard, the issues are quite different.
Patrick
if an implementation provides
integer types with
widths of 8, 16, 32, or 64 bits, no padding bits, and (for the signed
types) that have a
two’s complement representation, it shall define the corresponding
typedef names.
Patrick
function macros
to take the type they are looking up? If we can take the type, we can
make the semantics of returning pointers much more elegant.
Thanks for your help,
Patrick Moran
Walter Maguire
anks for any help.
Patrick Marlier.#include
namespace bench
{
class LLNode
{
LLNode* next;
int data;
public:
__attribute__((transaction_safe))
LLNode(int val, LLNode* m_next)
{
data = val;
next = m_next;
}
__attribute__((transact
ECF_RETURNS_TWICE flag is the right way to solve that?
Should I fill a bug-report?
Thanks.
Patrick Marlier.
De : Patrick Marlier [patrick.marl...@unine.ch]
Date d'envoi : jeudi 20 janvier 2011 20:42
À : gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc : r...@redhat.com; al...@redha
unterminated strings.
- patrick
On 2/22/2022 3:01 PM, Emile Michel Hobo via Gcc wrote:
Dear developers:
I find it counterintuitive that if I repeatedly reset a variable by using strcpy with an
empty string "" to that variable and then us strcat to add characters to that
variable that
architectures (i.e. arm vs x86)?
or different implementations of an architecture
(i.e. intel vs amd or early x86 vs current x86)
or ...
well, you get the idea.
Good luck,
- Patrick McGehearty
On 2/22/2022 3:49 PM, Paul Koning via Gcc wrote:
On Feb 22, 2022, at 4:26 PM, Gary Oblock via Gcc
otherwise (such as
those who live in countries who do not believe in free speech) now cannot use
Freenode any longer.
Do we want to use an IRC network that no longer supports freedom? Our only
option is to move to another network, such as irc.noderebellion.net or
irc.oftc.net
--
Patrick
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 06:58 am, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Patrick McFarland writes:
> > Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step
> > away in a direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from
> > the FreeNode network.
>
> I
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:03 am, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Andrew Haley:
> > Patrick McFarland writes:
> > > Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step
> > > away in a direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from
don't have answers to your previous questions (I may have in
the future when I will get a CPU with HTM).
About the last one, this fails for a long long time now (even on x86):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51173
Indeed, static constructors are not transaction safe yet and we should
have a workaround for this...
--
Patrick
#x27;-'.
$ curl
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-asm-with-goto.html\#Extended-asm-with-goto
Locally I have:
Is the version of texinfo buggy to generate online documentation?
Thanks,
--
Patrick Marlier
tion from a C to C++ bootstrap compiler a small oversight
was made (that -Wmissing-prototypes is a no-op against C++ source
files). If the answer to the previous question is "yes" then how
would one go about addressing the above gengtype-related warnings, if
at all?
Thanks for your time,
Patr
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 13 February 2014 20:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> On a related note, would a patch to officially enable
>> -Wmissing-declarations in the build process be well regarded?
>
> What would be the advantage?
A missing decl
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 February 2014 10:02, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely
>> wrote:
>>> On 13 February 2014 20:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>> On a related note, would a patch
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20 February 2014 15:31, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> (I counted nearly 100 (non-debug)
>> functions that could be made static in gcc, and 4 in libstdc++, by the
>> way.)
>
> Which were the four in libstdc++?
>
Summary for unix/-m32 ===
Running target unix
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
due to redefinition of GC_LINUX_THREADS.
Any reason why this patch was not applied?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01903.html
Thanks!
--
Patrick
On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 (test for excess errors
On 02/23/2012 09:34 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:14:17PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
Hi,
Here the links about that:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CopyrightAssignment
--
Patrick
On 08/02/2012 09:14 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please send me the copyright assignment forms for single
contributions and for all future contributions?
Cheers,
compiled with the right
EABI (does this question make sense??) ?
Any ideas or thoughts about this problem ?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Regards,
Patrick Olinet
#x27;m nevertheless not sure that this
option is the right one...
Any thoughts ? Is there a bug in libffi in that it doesn't support
powerpc CPU without FPU ?
Regards,
Patrick
On 5/8/07, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick Olinet writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I'
in is compiled with --with-float=soft, then you
should use the same options when compiling your code.
>
I thought that fpu emulation worked by trapping cpu exceptions when a
fpu instruction is being executed and then emulating this instruction
on software level.
Isn't the mechanism implemented by the "--with-float=soft" option ?
Patrick
nything to my native binary code ?
Patrick
.
Any thoughts about that ?
And should I report a new bug for this libffi/powerpc problem ?
And thanks again to all of you for your help.
Patrick
On 5/14/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Patrick Olinet wrote:
> Running with gdb, it looks like the prob
ok, I've created PR31937 related to the libffi bug and I've also
submitted a quick patch to the gcc-patches mailing list
Patrick
On 5/16/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 15, 2007, at 2:20 AM, Patrick Olinet wrote:
> Finally, I've tried it the dirty w
write the relevant information to a file. Any suggestions or pointers to
related work would be much appreciated.
Patrick
Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you'r
. At that point, the steering committee
can give warning and finally take the necessary action.
- Patrick McGehearty
On 4/14/2021 4:24 PM, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
On 4/14/2021 2:39 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:08 AM Jeff Law via Gcc
wrote:
once or twice when physical viol
On 1/9/20 5:28 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I have been able to rescue or reconstruct from patches the following
> prehisoric GCC releases
Great job. This is important
>
> gcc-0.9
> gcc-1.21
> gcc-1.22
> gcc-1.25
> gcc-1.26
> gcc-1.27
> gcc-1.28
> gcc-1.35
>
> gcc-1.36
> gcc-1.37.1
> gcc-1.38
> gcc
bbing is intended to close.
Having the scrubbing occur in the calle means the callee controls
what information is returned, making it responsible for its own
security.
Someone with a deeper understanding of the security reasons for
stack scrubbing may know whether my concern has any basis.
- Pa
.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header/type_traits
>
> Also, I would appreciate receiving the contact information for the
> project mentor, Patrick Palka.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ken Matsui
Hi Kritika,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 6:49 AM Kritika Rag via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone!
>
> I’m Kritika Rag, a Computer Science pre-final year undergraduate
> student from India. I’m quite passionate about web development and
> competitive programming and now I’m looking forward to contributin
e? Why is
gcc/include-fixed/limits.h being moved when updating the "install"
target?
Let me know if I can provide any other information that may help.
My build system:
* Linux 3.2.0
* EGLIBC 2.13
* GCC 4.7.2
* Binutils 2.22
Thanks,
--
Patrick "P. J." McDermott
http://www.pehjota.net/
http://www.pehjota.net/contact.html
On 2013-04-16 15:00, Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott wrote:
[...]
>
> I'm trying to build and install GCC 4.7.2, and I'm getting the following
> error from the "install-mkheaders" target of gcc/Makefile:
[...]
>
> The deletion of syslimits.h, movement of
74 matches
Mail list logo
