return 0;
}
When i is 36 and hyphen is 0 (and in many other cases), data[] will be
overflowed by quite a bit. Where does the breakdown in array bounds
detection occur, and why? Once I understand, and if the fix is simple
enough, I can try to fix the bug and supply a patch.
Thanks!
--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matt wrote:
Hello,
I recently came across a false negative in GCC's detection of array bounds
violation. At first, I thought the other tool (PC-Lint) was having false
positive, but it turns out to be correct
I'm getting this build failure with latest trunk, as of the composing of
this email:
../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/matt --enable-stage1-checking=all
--enable-bootstrap --enable-lto
--enable-languages=c,c++../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/matt
--enable-stage1-checkin
insights and/or help!
PS: I would test with a newer 4.5.0 build, but I'm having trouble
bootstrapping. Any help is appreciated on that email (sent yesterday), as
well.
--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt
racking on testing 4.5.
Thanks!
--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt
d the explicit cast necessary to silence the
gcc-as-cxx warning I was running into, but I wanted to be a good citizen
:)
Any pointers are appreciated,
Thanks!
--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt
o make sure that this wasn't a warning false positive first,
though.
--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Matt writes:
I'm trying to fix some errors/warnings to make sure that gcc-as-cxx
doesn't bitrot too much. I ran into this issue, and an unsure how to
fix it without really ugly casting:
enum df_changeable_flags
df_set_f
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Matt writes:
Yes, was I pasted was a local change. I was trying to eliminate the
implicit cast to int from the enum type, which was causing my
--enable-werror build to fail. At this point, I think the better
option would be to break up the enum
(now sending to gcc@ instead of gcc-help@, as suggested)
I have narrowed it down to this reduced commandline (the time is there
just to show that it may take a while, but this particular issue doesn't
cause a hang):
m...@hargett-755:~/src/gcc-obj/prev-gcc$ time
/home/matt/src/gc
f template
expansion during the profiledbootstrap. If I can get pointed in the right
direction, I can probably produce a patch within the next week.
Thanks for this work and adding all the extra warnings!
--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt
I get this failure when trying to do a proifledbootstrap on amd64. This is
a gentoo Linux machine with gcc 3.4.4, glibc 2.35, binutils 2.16.1,
autoconf 2.59, etc, etc.
make[6]: Entering directory
`/home/matt/src/gcc-bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3'
if [ -z "32" ]; then \
(or at least the libgfortran
configure) would test the execution of some or all of the required
functions in GMP/MPFR. I vaguely recall that this is possible with
autoconf, and should be more robust. Would it add too much complexity
to the top-level configure?
Thanks,
- Matt
>From: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Matt Fago wrote:
>> One issue here is that '--with-mpfr=path' assumes that 'libmpfr.a' is
>> in 'path/lib' (not true for how I installed it), while '--with-mpfr-
>> dir=path
of libmfpr was available
so long as the header was the correct version (this is likely on x86_64).
Please excuse any formatting issues -- this is my first patch. I have neither
SVN access nor a copyright assignment, but this is a short patch. Would
someone be willing to help test and possibly apply?
's outdated gmp/mpfr package doesn't help either ...
- Matt
> drizzle drizzle wrote:
>And as matt suggested if mpfr is not needed by 3.4, how can I
>configure it that way. --disable -mpfr did not help.
MPFR should not have _anything_ to do with any gcc prior to 4.x. Where did you
get gcc 3.4? A tarball from a gnu mirror or somewhere else? I thi
>From: drizzle drizzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Still no luck so far .. I got the gcc3.4 from the gcc archive. Any way
>I can make gcc 3.4 not use these libraries ?
What is the exact file name and URL? I will download the same tarball and try
to build it on my fc6 box.
- M
s
what specifies the tag (in this case 'trunk').
- Matt
e bug?
Thanks,
Matt
so can probably help you. Contact me in
>private mail and we'll try and troubleshoot it. If necessary, you can
>then file a bug report.
FYI, this is an issue with ccache and not gcc (I forgot about that possibility).
Guess it's time to dig into ccache.
Thanks,
Matt
Over the past several weeks, I've revamped the VAX backend:
- fixed various bugs
- improved 64bit move, add, subtract code.
- added patterns for ffs, bswap16, bswap32, sync_lock_test_and_set,
and
sync_lock_release
- modified it to generate PIC code.
- fixed the dwarf2 output so it is r
D
set for architecture specific reasons).
Is there a reason why MAP_FIXED isn't used even though it probably
should be?
--
Matt Thomas email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA disclaimer:
Committed.
--
Matt Thomas email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.
2005-03-26 Matt Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*
just to see how
much faster they are. I hope I'm going to pleasantly surprised but I'm
not counting on it.
--
Matt Thomas email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.
only decreased the bootstrap time by 10%. By far, the
longest bit of the bootstrap is building libjava.
--
Matt Thomas email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.
.
For instance:
(define_insn "*pushal"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "push_operand" "=g")
(match_operand:SI 0 "address_operand" "p"))]
""
"pushal %a1")
I like the more and simplier patterns approach
Gary Funck wrote:
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Matt Thomas
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:42 PM
>
> [...]
>
>>Alas, the --disable-checking and STAGE1_CFLAGS="-O2 -g" (which I was
>>already doing) only decreased the bootstrap time
David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>>>Matt Thomas writes:
>
>
> Matt> Regardless, GCC4.1 is a computational pig.
>
> If you are referring to the compiler itself, this has no basis in
> reality. If you are referring to the entire compiler collection,
> in
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:05:39AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
>
>>David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>>
>>> GCC now supports C++, Fortran 90 and Java. Those languages have
>>>extensive, complicated runtimes. The GCC Java envi
Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:12 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
It would be nice if bootstrap emitted timestamps when it was started
and when it completed a stage so one could just look at the make output.
You can get them differenced for free by using:
time make boostrap
I know that
he initial bootstrap
compiler was gcc3.3 and they are all running off the same base
of NetBSD 3.99.3.
While taking out fortran and java reduced the disparity, there
is still a large increase in bootstrap times from 3.4 to 4.1.
--
Matt Thomas email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3am Softwa
table structure,
the VAX uses a single page table of indirection. This greatly reduces
the amount of address space a process can efficiently use. If there
are components that will not be needed by some java programs, it would
nice if they could be separated into their shared libraries.
, so
Makefile.in should define and use VARRAY_H, right?
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 07:31:38PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:03:23AM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Monday 09 May 2005 02:26, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > > The rules for c-objc-common.o, loop-unroll.o, and tree-inline.o
support Fortran-66?
PS: Can I help in any way(testing the mingw port(i
don't have linux\bsd\unix\vms\os/2 or mac, just
windows and dos
Matt Ritchie
is a reference to the discussion on avrfreaks.net:
https://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/avr-gcc-and-avr-g-are-deprecated-now
Matt
I'd like to tell gcc that it's okay to inline functions (such as
rintf(), to get the SSE4.1 roundss instruction) at particular call
sights without compiling the entire source file or calling function
with different CFLAGS.
I attempted this by making inline wrapper functions annotated with
attribut
GCC 4.8 for VAX is generating a subreg:HI for mem:SI indexed address. This
eventually gets caught by an assert in change_address_1. Since the MEM rtx is
SI, legimate_address_p thinks it's fine.
I have a change to vax.md which catches these but it's extremely ugly and I
have to think there'
On May 30, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/25/14 18:19, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>
>> But even if movhi is a define_expand, as far as I can tell there's
>> isn't enough info to know whether that is possible. At that time,
>> how can I tell t
On Aug 31, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am writing some code and found that system crashed. I found it was
>> unaligned access which causes `data abort` exception. I write a piece
>> of code and objdump
>> it. I am not sure this is right or not.
>>
>> command:
>> arm-
http://goo.gl/fi3p2J
ICC 13.0.1: http://goo.gl/PRTTc6
Clang 3.4.1: http://goo.gl/95JEQc
I'll happily file a bug if necessary but I'm not clear in what phase
the optimization opportunity has been missed.
Thanks all, Matt
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Please file a bug with a test case. No need to worry about the phase
> too much initially, just fill in a reasonable component.
>
Thanks - filed as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64396
-matt
the example (which is also at the bottom of my email).
Is there a reason why (in principal) the volatile increment can't be
made into a single add? Clang and ICC both emit the same code for the
volatile and non-volatile case.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts on the matter,
Matt
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 26/12/14 20:32, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>> Is there a reason why (in principal) the volatile increment can't be
>> made into a single add? Clang and ICC both emit the same code for the
>> volatile and non-volatile cas
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677
Thanks Marc
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 26/12/14 22:49, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 26/12/14 20:32, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>> I realise my understanding could be wrong here!
>> If not though, b
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 5:20 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> Have you tried release and acquire/consume instead?
Yes; these emit the same instructions in this case. http://goo.gl/e94Ya7
Regards, Matt
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 27/12/14 00:02, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 26/12/14 22:49, Matt Godbolt wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
n this case you now know: it's a bug! But one that it's
>fairly hard to care deeply about, although it might get fixed now.
Understood completely! Thanks again,
Matt
three instructions to be a single
increment in the case of x86 given relaxed memory ordering, I can
offer no good opinion (though my instinct is it should be able to be!)
Thanks all for your help, Matt
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:53 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Matt Godbolt writes:
>> GCC's code generation uses a "load; add; store" for volatiles, instead
>> of a single "add 1, [metric]".
>
> GCC doesn't know if a target's load/add/store
rocessed due to #1.
This is my first report so I wouldn't mind some guidance. I'm
familiar enough with debugging to gather whatever other level details
are requested. Most of this was found using gdb.
--
Matt Breedlove
during configuration. Combined with
building libiberty with "-fno-builtin-stpcpy" (PR 66014), I have
gotten all builds to finally succeed. I could use some guidance on
where to go from here, however.
Thanks,
Matt
On Feb 12, 2011, at 1:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * H. J. Lu:
>>
>>> We made lots of progresses on x32 pABI:
>>>
>>> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
>>>
>>> 1. Kernel interface with syscall is close to be finalized.
>>> 2. GCC x32 br
On Feb 12, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 02/12/2011 01:10 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Why is the ia32 compatiblity kernel interface used?
>>
>> Because there is no way in hell we're designing in a second
>> compatibility
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:29 PM, David Daney wrote:
> Background:
>
> Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of
> user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is
> segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is available. Pointer
> values are always
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>
>> I have to wonder if it's worth the effort. The primary problem I see
>> is that this new ABI requires a 64bit kernel since faults through the
>> upper 2G will go
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:26 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 06:14 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:57:13PM -0800, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> It seems that this proposal would benefit programs that need more than 2 GB
>>> but less than 4 GB, and for some reason really don't want
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:50 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 06:33 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/14/2011 04:15 PM, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have to wonder if it'
-it needs to have lots of variables active at once,
and the error doesn't occur unless I'm compiling for Thumb.
Unfortunately I don't have a way to test this on tips, so I can't tell
if it's been fixed there or not. Any information on this would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
Matt
Hey Sarah,
Many array bounds and format string problems can already be found, especially
with LTO, ClooG, loop-unrolling, and -O3 enabled. Seeing across object-file
boundaries, understanding loop boundaries, and aggressive inlining allows GCC
to warn about a lot of real-world vulnerabilities. W
> > This brings out 2 questions. Why don't GCC 4.4/4.6/4.7 warn it?
> > Why doesn't 64bit GCC 4.2 warn it?
> Good question. It seems that the difference is whether the compiler
> generates a field-by-field copy or a call to memcpy(). According to
> David, the trunk gcc in 32-bit mode doesn't call
, link time
optimization, C++Ox, ...
Thanks,
Matt
plugin code executes for function 'fn':
:
# .MEM_4 = VDEF <.MEM_3(D)>
main.myglobal.13_1 = __go_new_nopointers (4);
# .MEM_5 = VDEF <.MEM_4>
main.myglobal = main.myglobal.13_1;
# VUSE <.MEM_5>
D.186_2 = main.myglobal;
return D.186_2;
Any insight would be helpful.
Thanks!
-Matt
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
>> I am writing a gcc plugin and am trying to detect if a value assigned by a
>> function call, is a global variable or not. Unfortunately, all calls to
>> '
this is an actual bug, or required for some reason by the
standard, or just behavior that not enough people have run into
problems with?
Thanks,
Matt
l. I assume there is
a better/different way of determining if an argument points to my node?
Thanks for any insight.
-Matt
never execute more than once, as n
must be < 2, and in the body of the loop, n is decremented.
The resulting machine code includes the backward branch to the top of
the while (n >= 1) loop, which can never be taken.
I suppose this is a missed optimization. Is this known, or should I
make a new bug report?
Thanks,
Matt Turner
d
for them. Can a (define_bypass ...) function specify a latency value
greater than the default latency, or should I raise the default
latency and special-case fst/ftoi consumers like I've done for
cross-cluster delay?
Thanks a lot!
Matt Turner
[1] http://www.compaq.com/cpq-a
l/gcc/2010-01/msg00063.html
suggesting the addition of a --multilib= configure option. Has such a
thing been added? Is there a way to configure gcc to build only n32
and n64 ABIs?
Thanks,
Matt
> GCC 4.6.1 first release candidate has been uploaded, and the branch
> is now frozen. All changes need RM approval now.
> Please test it, if all goes well, 4.6.1 will be released early next
> week.
No chance for a fix for this in 4.6.1?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
This has
> As of a couple of months, I perform a bootstrap-with-C++
> (--enable-build-with-cxx) daily on my machine between 18:10 and 20:10 UTC.
> Is there still interest in daily builds like mine ?
Absolutely! Especially if you do a profiled-bootstrap and/or LTO bootstrap in
that mode. Hopefully this is
my
transformation pass, still no luck
Any suggestions would be welcomed. Thanks for even reading this far.
-Matt
for this PARM_DECL node? The SSA has been generated before my
plugin
executes. Also, I do call update_ssa() after the routines are processed by my
passes.
Thanks for any insight.
-Matt
checking_assert (cg_edge);
cg_node comes back as being NULL since there is only one callee and no indirect
calls, the function that has the inserted call is main(). Is there something I
forgot to do after inserting the gimple call statement? This works fine without
optimization.
-Matt
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:27:49AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am having the compiler insert a call to a function which is defined inside
> > another object file. However, during inline expansion via
&
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:25:45AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:27:49AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Matt Davis wrote:
> >> > Hello,
&
get built?
-Matt
ister data as a
root in the garbage collector, so that its not in conflict with my allocation?
The other option would be to try to override "__go_new" with my own
implementation, but keeping the same symbol name so that the linker does the
dirty work.
-Matt
nce to pass to
'fn()', which is 'V' in the case above? Or, will the build_constructor()
produce a tree node that I can treat as a variable, that I can pass to 'fn()' ?
-Matt
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Matt Davis wrote:
> I am working on a gcc-plugin where I need to create a structure at compile
> time.
> I have gleaned over one of the front ends to learn more about creating
> structures at compile time. What I have thus far is a type node for
seem to find the arguments stashed
anywhere. I know this is somewhat of a special case. Typically, if I
had a fndecl it would be easy, but all I know in my case is the
function type.
-Matt
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Matt Davis writes:
>
>> I am trying to look at the arguments that are passed to a function
>> pointer. I have an SSA_NAME which is for a pointer-type to a
>> function-type. I want to obtain the argum
. I also set_default_ssa_name() on the returned
value from ipa_modify_formal_parameter (the adjustment's 'reduction' field). Do
I need to re-gimplify the function or run some kind of 'cleanup' or 'update'
once I modify this formal parameter?
Thanks
-Matt
Hi Martin and thank you very much for your reply. I do have some more
resolution to my issue.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 01:57:17PM +1100, Matt Davis wrote:
>> I am using 'ipa_modify_formal_parameters()'
Here is a follow up. I am closer to what I need, but not quite there
yet. Basically I just want to switch the type of one formal parameter
to a different type.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Matt Davis wrote:
> Hi Martin and thank you very much for your reply. I do have some m
de for the COND_EXEC expression, which is what I
emit into the program:
rtx sym = gen_rtx_SYMBOL_REF(Pmode, "abort");
rtx abrt_addr = gen_rtx_MEM(Pmode, sym);
rtx abrt = gen_rtx_CALL(VOIDmode, abrt_addr, const0_rtx);
rtx cond = gen_rtx_COND_EXEC(VOIDmode, cmp, abrt);
Thanks
-Matt
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, Matt Davis wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am having an RTL problem trying to make a function call from a
>> COND_EXEC rtx. The reload pass has been called, and very simply I
>> want to
For a Go program being compiled in gcc, from the middle end, is there a way to
figure-out which routines make up the interface-method-table? I could check the
mangled name of the method table, but is there another way to deduce what
methods compose it from the middle-end?
Thanks!
-Matt
ns, but seems I am still
having a bit of trouble.
-Matt
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:21 PM, James Courtier-Dutton
wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2012 5:21 AM, "Matt Davis" wrote:
>> Essentially, I just want to emit: "and %eax, $0x7"
>>
> Assuming at&t format, does that instruction actually exist?
> How can you
d I can get you
access to a quad-833MHz ES40 to do testing on, if need be.
Thanks,
Matt Turner
T the program will produce
incorrect results and assert(). At -O0 or -O1 or without one or both
of the -D flags, it will produce correct results. I've tested with
gcc-4.3.4 and gcc-4.4.2.
Thanks. Let me know what I can do to help further.
Matt Turner
sched_find_first_bit.tar.gz
Descriptio
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> I was rewriting the Alpha sched_find_first_bit implementation for the
>> Linux Kernel, and in the process I think I've come across a gcc bug.
>
> [...]
>
&
reliable way to write data to the stack such that a called
function pointer can extract the values it seeks?
Thanks,
Matt
On Mar 13, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Hm. In fold-const.c we try to make sure to produce the same result
as the target would for constant-folding shifts. Thus, Paolo, I
think
what fold-const.c does is what we should assume for
!SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED. No?
Unfortunately it is
Hi,
I'm having trouble compiling the following with g++ 4.2.1:
class Uncopyable
{
public:
Uncopyable(int x) {}
private:
Uncopyable(const Uncopyable & other) {}
};
class User
{
public:
void foo(int x)
{
foo(Uncopyable(x));
}
void foo(
I've been trying to write a program with a logging thread that will
consume messages in 'printf format' passed via a struct. It seemed
that this should be possible using va_copy to copy the variadic
arguments but they would always come out as garbage. This is with gcc
4.1.2 on amd64. Reading throug
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:49:27PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Matt Provost wrote:
> > void tdebug(const char *format, ...) {
> > ?? ??va_list ap;
> > ?? ??pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
> > ?? ??mylog.format = format;
> > ?? ??v
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
