Hello,
How come the following code would not be considered a Warning?
Surely there is no possible way this would be intentional?
if (x<4);
x++;
Cheers,
Ivan
Can you recommend a solution for compiling Windows DLLs on any
variation of UNIX?
We currently do this with Cygwin/Windows, but would like to go one
step further and do the builds on a UNIX machine that produces
Windows DLLs.
Thanks for any advice,
Ivan
.
Having a windows machine with an ssh server running as a compile host
is less favorable than a UNIX machine with a cross compiler.
Ivan
On 26 Aug 2005, at 01:48, Mike Stump wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Ivan Novick wrote:
Can you recommend a solution for compiling Windows DLLs on any
So, you think that when people need to build windows apps, the
"recommendation" should be that people should buy a linux box, put
their
sources on the linux box, figure out where to get or how to build a
cross compiler, build the sources, and then figure out how to transfer
the sources to the w
Currently we use ld as a linker on Solaris.
Is there a gcc linker and is this preferable to using ld?
Thanks for any input?
Ivan
I would subscribe to the MinGW list as this is a key technology to
making cygwin/windows cross compiling work
http://www.mingw.org/
On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:41 AM, Brian Rose wrote:
I am an embedded software developer and I am interested in using
GCC as a
cross-compiler on the Cygwin/Windows p
Hi,
With the sun compiler, the declared buffer is pushed onto the stack upon
entry into function foo and not only when it goes into scope.
Do you know if gcc will use the stack for the buffer if it never goes into
scope?
function foo()
{
if ( debug > 0 )
{
char debug_buffer[4096
I am a gcc user at a fininancial institution and IMHO it would not be a
good idea to have non-production ready functionality in gcc. We are
trying to use gcc for mission critical functionality.
Hope this helps,
Ivan
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Dan Berlin and I exchanged some email about PR 26435, w
This has been very enlightening information.
Is it documented anywhere which gcc features should not be trusted or
are known to have faults?
Regards,
Ivan
Richard Guenther wrote:
On 4/18/06, Ivan Novick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am a gcc user at a fininancial institution and I
users don't know.
Ivan
Joe Buck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:14:27AM +0000, Ivan Novick wrote:
Is it documented anywhere which gcc features should not be trusted or
are known to have faults?
The only source of "known to have faults" is the bug database.
However, in an
10 matches
Mail list logo
