Web page updated thusly.
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.814
diff -u -r1.814 index.html
--- index.html 12 Oct 2011 04:48:22 - 1.814
+++ index.html 22 Oct 2011 13:13
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Kohei Takahashi wrote:
> I'm GCC mirror admin of ftp.tsukuba.wide.ad.jp. Could you change my mail
> address of mirror lists to tsukuba-ftp-serv...@tsukuba.wide.ad.jp ?
Sure, just done by means of the patch below. Thanks for letting us
know!
Gerald
Index: mirrors.html
=
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Joe Buck wrote:
> No, the page now claims something that is incorrect. The C++0x draft
> is no longer evolving. C++11 is an official standard now.
How about the patch below? It tries to reflect the release of
C++11. There definitely will be more adjustments, but this is
a
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Since C++11 is now the official name, wouldn't it be better to use the
> new name instead of the old one after the initial historical
> introduction? :) Like...
Yes. Originally I wanted to avoid that to get my patch in faster,
but since you ask. Here is
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Personally I *like* it when a new release identifies portability
> problems such as missing includes. I consider it an advantage,
> and an improvement in the compiler.
That's a valid approach from a technology perspective. From a
customer/user pers
GCC fails to build on FreeBSD 10, and debugging this I ran into the
following snippet that's spread all over the place in various ./configure
files:
freebsd* | dragonfly*)
# DragonFly does not have aout. When/if they implement a new
# versioning mechanism, adjust this.
if test -x /
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Are you sure that they come from autoconf? I'd say they come from
> toplevel libtool.m4.
You right; bah, my bad.
> When I tested this, I only had to adjust libtool.m4 and then autoconf'ing the
> needed files.
>
> libtool.m4 change:
>
Hi Diego,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Gerald, I've been searching for the release criteria pages for various
> releases. I haven't found anything. I was expecting to find them as
> top-level links on the home page.
the release criteria are there, cf.
> ls ~/wwwdocs/htdocs/*/
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I was thinking changing the text:
>
> Active development: GCC 4.7.0 (changes)
>
> to
>
> Active development: GCC 4.7.0 (changes, release criteria)
Sounds good to me!
> Or simply make 'GCC 4.7.0' a link to a 4.7-specific page.
I'm not sure one would
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, В.Тутубалин wrote:
> I want to host a new mirror site Gcc.
> Server name - Latvia ChampGround
> Server admin - vt.avtm...@gmail.com, Vladimir
> Server location - Latvia, Riga
> Server address - champground.com
> Server protocol - http
> Connection speed - 100 Mbps
Sure, go
It's my pleasure to announce that Eric Botcazou is joining Arnaud,
Geert and Robert as maintainer for Ada.
(Turns out that when discussing this many were actually suprised
he was not already. :-)
Eric, you know the procedure, MAINTAINERS and such.
Keep up the good work, and happy hacking!
Geral
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I indeed do not see where we link to criteria.html. I think we should
> duplicate the list of primary/secondary targets on the releases
> index.html page(?) and make the rest of the criteria.html generic,
> pointing to it from gcc.gnu.org directly.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> I'll sponsor Oleg Endo as a new write after approval maintainer.
> He has written several good patches for SH targets and has filed
> good PRs. He is working on the issues which will require larger
> patches and being write after approval looks to be helpfu
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Thanks. I fixed this yesterday. Reload?
Aren't we trying to get rid of that? ;-)
SCNR,
Gerald
FYI. Somehow these announcements have not been making it to the
mailing list for a week or two, so I am forwarding them manually
for the time being.
Gerald
-- Forwarded message --
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120106 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120106/
an
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, NetGull Administrator wrote:
> I've just set up a new GCC mirror. Information is as follows:
>
> URL: http://www.netgull.com/gcc/
> Frequency:once a day
> Location:San Jose, California, United States, North America
> Contact: ad...@netgull.com
>
> Please, add
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Douglas Rupp wrote:
> If it please the Committee: I volunteer as the Interix maintainer.
You forgot to attach two passport photos and your credit card
information for the processing fee, Douglas, but we can attend
to that later. :-)
On a more serious note, I'm taking care of
I'm raising this on the steering committee, Walter.
Gerald
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Santosh Sharma Poudel wrote:
> You wish to host a new mirror site, in my area. Below mention is my
> personal detail.
>
> Name: Santosh Sharma poudel
> City: kathmandu.
> Country: Nepal.
Thank you for the offer. That probably will be our highest
altitude mirror. :-)
Please
Walter,
I am happy to announce your appointment as maintainer for this port /
these ports pending initial technical approval. That could come from
Richard or Joseph, for example.
As part of your initial commit, please add your name to MAINTAINERS
and submit a news item for our main page as well
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> It seems to me that e-mail to gcc-b...@gcc.gnu.org is basically lost
> in the noise. It seems to me that we should not recommend that people
> send bug reports there; the chances that anything will happen are much
> smaller than the already small cha
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Michael Eager wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini suggested that I create a branch off the
> gcc-4.1.2 tag and commit the original port to this branch.
> Then move this branch up to 4.3.x and then head.
>
> OK to create a microblaze branch?
If you have write access to the repository, you c
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Michael Eager wrote:
> Created gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/microblaze. Here is the update
> to svn.html:
Looks good to me, you just may want to add a closing .
Thanks,
Gerald
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Nguyen Quang Minh wrote:
> I'm a C++ developer on Linux. I want you show me the ways to install
> both GCC 4.1.2 and GCC 3.2.3 on my Linux.
This question is out of scope for this mailing list which is about
the development _of_ GCC, not the development _with_ GCC.
I believe yo
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, FX wrote:
> Filed as PR 41245.
Same for i386-unknown-freebsd7.2:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/cfgloopmanip.o differs
g
i386-unknown-freebsd7.2, specifically, now PR 41326, after it has
been originally fixed a few days ago.
Gerald
-- Forwarded message --
GCC_SOURCE is /usr/test/gcc
Building in /usr/nabil-files/pfeifer/OBJ-0909-2216
Installing to /files/pfeifer/gcc
Uconfigure
Ulibtool.m4
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Ryan Hill wrote:
>> I haven't been able to bootstrap x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu at all since this
>> started. Latest attempt was with r151649.
>> Configured as:
> I was able to build using --enable-checking. Should I file a new PR?
If you are still seeing this, I think that wou
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Li Feng wrote:
> This is the patch that add my name to Write-after-Approval List.
Thanks for doing this, Li Feng. Sadly I realized that many other
haven't done so in the past, and while I managed to resolve a number
of those this year so far, the following are still open:
Th
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Yuriy Kolesnikov wrote:
> Please provide more information, like here
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors
This is a nice idea. Are you interested in working on it? As you
may know, GCC is a volunteer project and we appreciate any help we
can get also on the infrast
Rob,
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Rob Myers wrote:
> The gnu.org webmaster team are going to be updating all the pages in the
> gnu.org/software subdirectory, which includes -
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/fortran
>
> This will involve changing the design of the page to match the new style
> of gnu.or
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>>> I'm thinking of changing my auto tester to report a broken bootstrap
>>> (the first time a bootstrap fails), is there a normalized way to
>> report such failures to gcc-testresults@ or g...@?
>> I report it to gcc-regress...@.
> It's documented by http:
It turns out that IRIX and OSF have not managed to keep Rainer Orth
sufficiently busy after I sent
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-07/msg00654.html
so I am pleased to announce that the steering committee is appointing
him maintainer for our Solaris ports as well. :-)
Please update MAINTAINERS
It is my pleasure to announce that the steering committee has
appointed Le-Chun Wu and Rafael Espindola plug-in reviewers.
Thanks for all your contributions so far, and keep up the good
work!
Please adjust the MAINTAINERS file accordingly, and Happy hacking!
Gerald
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> As commented to my last status report develop.html does not reflect
> reality anymore. The following tries to adjust it carefully in
> this respect.
I believe you got the math wrong in one case, when you went from
four months that a branch will need
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> We have ~48 hours left for stage 1 and I can't be confident of getting
> it reviewed in the remaining time, so I'd like to make a special
> request: can you, as RM, please say that this is OK in principle and
> that if I can get v3 approval (it already has
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Ok with me.
Applied now.
Gerald
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Vineet Dwivedi wrote:
>> Hi, We have hosted gcc mirror at the following location
>>
>> http://mirror.vocabbuilder.net/gnu/gcc/
>>
>> Request you to include this in your list of mirrors. My contact details are
>> in the signature below.
Thanks, Vineet.
The mirror list we main
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Ben Elliston wrote:
> I deleted a personal branch from 5 years ago and have added the revision
> number of the delete commit to the branch description in svn.html.
>
> Would these two conventions suffice?
Would it make sense to document the outcome of this conversation in
s
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> Please test this MPC package and report back the results of running
> "make check" along with your target triplet, the compiler version you
> used, and the versions of gmp/mpfr used to compile it. You do not
> necessarily need to bootstrap mainline GCC
At http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/#the_old_problems_file we have a short
list coming from the GCC 2 PROBLEMS file. Instead of carrying this
around forever, I am wondering whether we could quickly review these
and either remove (as not applicable any longer) or move to Bugzilla?
Possible special co
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> The platforms still needed for mpc-0.8 release testing are:
>
> i386-unknown-freebsd (have results for mpc-0.8dev)
Watch gcc-testresults, my first submission of building GCC trunk with
mpc-0.8 (release) should appear there in a third of a day.
Also, a
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> 2. i386-unknown-freebsd and i686-apple-darwin are generic, but
> config.guess will supply specific version numbers. What version
> should MPC be shown to work on? Any one of them would do?
For FreeBSD, I'd specify versions 6.x and above. Older versio
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> i386-unknown-freebsd (have results for mpc-0.8dev)
> Watch gcc-testresults, my first submission of building GCC trunk with
> mpc-0.8 (release) should appear there in a third of a day.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg00664.html
Gerald
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> With a plugin, the developer can simply point the user at the place where
> he can download the plugin for his current version, and we can get quick
> feedback on the usefulness of the new optimization.
Except that, based on what Richard and Basile discu
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>> All of which terribly reminds me of the painful (for end users, ISVs,
>> IHVs, OSVs,...) situation we have with the Linux kernel and out-of-tree
>> modules.
> I do agree with the similarity. But is that situation [of today's linux
> kernel modul
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
>> I wonder if there would be an interest for a C++ template / compile
>> time ray tracer as a heavy test for
>>
>> * templates in general
>> * the type system
>> * regression and conformance testing
> How big is it? It might be suitable to go in the contrib/
Hi M,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, g...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
> I'm now doing regular builds/tests from SVN of GCC, G++ and GNAT on
> FreeBSD x86_64 and publishing the build logs at:
>
> http://gcc.coreland.ath.cx
would you mind submitting your test results to gcc-testresu...@gcc.gnu.org
going forwar
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, fikri fadzil wrote:
> I want to offer my site to become another mirror for GCC. the server
> for my website is located in Malaysia.
>
> URL: http://hackgreen.org/gcc
> Location: Malaysia
> Email: ad...@hackgreen.org
> Name: malaya
Thank you for the offer! It is very easy to b
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, JohnT wrote:
> Some of the sites listed on the mirror list
> http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html aren't up to date and some aren't
> accessible. LaffeyComputer.com doesn't allow access, and used to
> require a password for access. This isn't the way a GNU mirror site
> ought to o
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> But does it, though? From http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html:
>[...]
> So, where are whitespace changes to non-comment parts of .c and .h
> source files covered? I think that there may be a bit of a common
> assumption that "obvious" extends somewhat furthe
Vineet,
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Vineet Dwivedi wrote:
> The mirror is now directly syncing from gcc and can be accessed at
>
> http://mirror.vocabbuilder.net/gcc/
I was just going to add this to http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html (sorry
for originally missing that), but noticed that it had not mirrore
This has been forwarded to the steering committee (thanks, David)
and the FSF and we are pushing to get it addressed.
Gerald
It is my pleasure to announce that with strong support by the three
existing maintainers in this area, the steering committee has appointed
Dave Korn Cygwin (actually "windows, cygwin, mingw") maintainer.
Thanks for your contributions so far, keep up the good work, Dave, and
please adjust the MAIN
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Ding Curie wrote:
> I'm using GCC 3.4.5 (mingw-vista special r3). I downloaded the latest
> mingw; I take it for granted that latest mingw uses latest GCC.
That may not be a correct assumption. In general, please go to
http://gcc.gnu.org to see which version of GCC are current
It is my pleasure to announce that, also based on the recommendation of
Bernd as an existing maintainer, the steering committee has appointed
Jie Zhang maintainer of the bfin port.
Thanks for your contributions over the last five(?) years, Jie.
Please adjust the MAINTAINERS file accordingly, and
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> I was idly looking through a couple of snapshots of the gcc -trunk line.
>> I am by no means a compiler developer, but I did notice that you aren't
>> using lzma for compression. I don't know if bandwidth is at all a
>> concern, but I can point to a >
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> As for the relative hurts. Code compiled for a newer CPU (making use
> of newer instructions) will not run at all on older CPUs not supporting
> those newer instructions. Much hurt there.
>
> On the other hand code compiled for an older CPU that is run
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Gary Funck wrote:
> What is the recommended process for having GUPC reviewed
> (and hopefully, subsequently approved) for being merged
> into the GCC mainline?
Are there any fixes / enhancements you need in common GCC code? If
so, submitting those first and separately might ma
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I am stepping down as the spu backend maintainer since Sony removed
> GNU/Linux (OtherOS) support from their newer PS3 firmware. The main
> reason is I will no longer have access to a machine to support the
> target. But really this is also a step back
Hi James,
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, James Miller wrote:
> We would like to raise an HTTP GCC mirror on our dedicated server in
> Canada and I would be very grateful if you provided me with
> instructions.
you can just start by mirroring our server and then advise us of it
via the last paragraph at htt
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Dave Korn wrote:
> But I agree with this: a release announcement is just an email someone
> sends out after a new release is uploaded, it is not a major PR effort
Let's not underestimate the effect our releases have in terms of PR
and how much GCC actually is in need of PR.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I see plugins as a new feature for GCC developers. There is little
> value in announcing "we have plugin support" to our users if you can't
> name at least one that is supported out-of-the-box (and obviously we
> don't support plugins at all).
Our
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering if you could help me figure out how to fix the tests
> g++.old-deja/g++.other/static14.C and g++.old-deja/g++.other/static20.C
> which started failing on IA64 HP-UX at version 138150 when you checked
> in the C++ inlining change. Here
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008, Thomas Lepping wrote:
> Hi! I am inetested to setup a FTP mirror for the GCC distribution in
> Germany. How much disk space/bandwith does it need to provide a mirror?
About 17GB right now. I'll clean up older snapshots this afternoon, but
that won't reduce much (and only tempo
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> is the goal to only permit FSF copyrighted GPLed plugins
The FSF is concerned about making and keeping software free. Copyright
assignment to the FSF is required to get code into the FSF version of
GCC; it is not needed otherwise.
Gerald
[ Oops, somehow I had missed this... ]
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> At http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/extensions.html we have a reference
>> to the DLX port of GCC, which corresponds to the DLX machine described
>> in "Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach" by Hennessy and
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Richard Guenther wrote:
> This is reasonable. Note that
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html already lists
> mpfr 2.3.0 as prerequesite (that page still might need an update for
> clarification).
That page is generated from gcc/doc/install.texi, so once Kaveh has
co
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> I'll take care of this, provided Gerald approves the change. Gerald, if
> you think that copyright is a problem, I'll gladly rephrase it.
Thanks for the change, it looks like a good one. You may want to make
one or the other adjustment for extra saf
Hi Dennis,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> I noticed that the "Build status for GCC" page has no link
> at all for 4.3.x and it would be nice to add that there please.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html
thanks for catching this; I just committed the patch included at the
end of
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jonathan Grant wrote:
> I noticed that in the default Firefox3 configuration on my 1280x1024 display
> your code samples on this page are tiny, and v.hard to read:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html
>
> I see in the HTML this is the code causing the small font:
es gmp.
> I believe that this is false these days. I believe that it has been
> false since a cross-compiler to the alpha required a 64-bit
> HOST_WIDE_INT, which was in gcc 3.4.
Does this mean you (or Rainer) would approve the following documentation
update? ;-)
Gerald
2008-11-02 G
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Jonathan Grant wrote:
>> I noticed that in the default Firefox3 configuration on my 1280x1024 display
>> your code samples on this page are tiny, and v.hard to
Hi Adriaticus,
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Adriaticus wrote:
> welcome
> I would like to create mirror gcc
> http://mirror.adriaticus.org/pub/gcc/
> ftp://mirror.adriaticus.org/pub/gcc/
just go ahead! Once the mirror is up and running a patch against
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html to add an new entry
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello Steering Committee,
I raised this on the steering committee...
Gerald
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hello Steering Committee,
> I raised this on the steering committee...
You've got the hat, Kai, congratulations! Please update the MAINTAINERS
file accordingly.
Happy hacking,
Gerald
Steve et al,
I don't think I have seen a response to this, and it might be the same
issue that was causing quite many testsuite failures on i386-unknown-freebsd
If so, that would be GCC Bugzilla Bug 35114, "731 unexpected libgomp
testsuite failures due setup of test environment", or
http://gcc.g
Hi Joost,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
>>> Would be great if such a thing could be detected at configure time
>>> (i.e. like missing mpfr.h headers are already detected), with some
>>> kind of a gentle error message.
>> It wouldn't be detected until the target libs are built, s
prove the following documentation
>> update? ;-)
> at least I can't since I've never built cross-compilers to
> alpha-dec-osf, so I cannot say if it's true or not.
Ian? Okay to commit?
2008-11-18 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/install.texi (alpha*-dec-osf*): Remove n
Hi Sterling,
one thing I also recommend is sending regular test results to the
gcc-testresults list. I believe there were ~two sent in November,
none in December, and one this year so far which is a bit on the
low end. Several of us operate nightly or at least weekly testers,
and regular testing
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> This.
Thanks, Paolo! Scary how quickly this is growing...
Gerald
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, i...@onlinedirect.bg wrote:
> Hello, we decided to run new GCC mirror in Bulgaria. Here are the details.
> Country: Bulgaria
> City: Sofia
> Bandwidth: 2 gbps aggregated link to the Bulgarian Peering, 500 mbps
> international
> Contact: i...@onlinedirect.bg
> URL: http://gcc.ig
And here the website update...
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.683
retrieving revision 1.685
diff -u -3 -p -r1.683 -r1.685
--- index.html 24 Jan 2009 14:13:55 -
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Adam Nemet wrote:
> Gerald Pfeifer writes:
>> +January 27, 2008
> 2009 ;)
Oops. Good catch! I guess that shows this was a bit of a lengthy
process. ;-)
Gerald
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> Will the transition to use GPLv3+exception need to be made on release
>> branches before any more releases are made from them (so that if anyone
>> should volunteer to the SC to make any further 4.2 releases, before the
>> poi
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I have created the plugins branch (rev. 143989). As I offered before,
> I will help maintain the branch synchronized with mainline and with
> patch reviews. The branch can be checked out with
>
> $ svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/plugins
Nice
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > This means disabling snapshots and nightly DATESTAMP updates for the
> > branch, closing bugs that are open as 4.2 regressions but fixed in
> > 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5, and removing "4.2/" from the summaries of 4.2
> > regression bugs that remain open as als
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Narasimha Datta wrote:
> I'd love to check out the generated code on a later gcc, but
> unfortunately we are not in a position to upgrade our gcc. We
> just use the default gcc that came with FreeBSD 7.0.
You can always install one of the lang/gcc ports in addition, for
examp
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Ádám Rák wrote:
> I mirrored the ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc to
>
> http://robotlab.itk.ppke.hu/gcc
>
> country: Hungary
> city: Budapest
>
> contact:
> name: Adam Rak (Ádám Rák)
> e-mail: neur...@gmail.com
Thanks for the mirroring and the note, Ádám! I have applied the
patc
gcc.gnu.org itself.
Gerald
2009-02-21 Gerald Pfeifer
* update_version_svn (ADD_BRANCHES): Remove autovect-branch
and document format.
Index: update_version_svn
===
--- update_version_svn (revi
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>> At http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html , I see:
> I believe this one is for released compilers, not SVN trunk.
Actually, http://gcc.gnu.org/install/ is the latest from SVN on a
nightly base. (I checked the crontab we have on gcc.gnu.org to be
sure.)
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Can someone *please* ban this nutcase from the wiki?
> There is almost weekly spam added to the wiki from this account.
> Thanks,
Let me forward this to the overseers team...
Gerald
I have seen Bruce very response, even recently, but your mail does
not have any direct reference to [fixincl] in the subject, so let
me include him explicitly.
Gerald
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16300
>
> This bug was originally rep
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> The reason I asked was that we have that reference from our site to that
>> URL and I failed to find any replacement so far. The first two hits that
>> I get in Google actually are mails by you in the gcc archives. ;-)
>>
>> I guess we'll just have to r
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> I doubt there are many Itanium 1 machines left in use (production or
> even for hobbyists). The only Itanium1 that reached the market was the
> Merced, AFAIK. But only a few 1000s of these were sold, in 2000/2001.
> Most of them are probably not running
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> I think a change in the licence is against the gcc policy for stage 4:
> it is neither a regression (no pr open stating it) nor a documentation
> fix.
Note that documentation changes don't need to be fixes in any GCC
stage. (The license is close
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I've seen other statements on this thread indicating that the SC will
> essentially give in to any demand from RMS.
That does not match my experience, though.
Gerald
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> I do see that FreeBSD Ports has mpfr 2.4.1. How advanced of them.
> Amazing :-()
It's possible I am missing something here. According to
http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/ (reachable from http://www.mpfr.org/
by following "Latest release") this is the
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Exactly the same happens on trunk.
GCC 4.5 _is_ trunk :-), so that explains this aspect, I believe.
Gerald
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Maybe we can remove DATESTAMP and updating it now that
>>> gcc_update understands to extract the SVN revision number?
>> Anyway, removing DATESTAMP would change the issue to new snapshots with no
>> changes rather than with just DATESTAMP changes.
> My regress
patch below, but will wait a couple of
days (not the least until you are back) before making this change.
Gerald
2009-04-04 Gerald Pfeifer
* update_web_docs_svn: Run this script under plain /bin/sh
as o
401 - 500 of 883 matches
Mail list logo
