ause this can ensure that the install dir will be new gcc's path.
>
> If this is ok, I will post a little patch.
>
> Zhang Le
Best regards,
Eus
story, but
> especially for the sake of LTO I think this is the way to go.
>
> Paolo
--
Best regards,
Eus (FSF member #4445)
In this digital era, where computing technology is pervasive, your
freedom depends on the software controlling those computing devices.
Join free software movem
Hi Ho!
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:49 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Eus wrote:
> > Hi Ho!
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 15:29 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> So while trapping variants can certainly be introduced it looks like
> >>> this task may be m
rn *bar + 5;
}
and
int foo (int *bar)
{
return *bar + 5;
}
?
I think they are also identical. Am I right? Who knows the one with
"extern" can be overridden in another TU defining its own definition
without "extern".
Thank you for your help :-)
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
&
TU defining its own definition
> > without "extern".
>
> These are not identical, but the meaning in C is complex because it
> changes depending on which standard you are using. Look at the docs
> for
> the -fgnu89-inline option and the gnu_inline function attribute.
A
when compared to:
> typedef int j;
> typedef int j; // legal in C++03, invalid as a duplication definition in C99
Heh, that's strange ;-)
Thanks for your further clarification :-)
> -- James
--
Best regards,
Eus (FSF member #4445)
In this digital era, where computing technolo
I think, none. I also try [EMAIL PROTECTED] just now. So, I'll tell you
tomorrow if I have something.
> many thanks for your time,
> mojmir
Your welcome.
Best regards,
Eus
still cannot retrieve anything with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so that we can debug the problem.
Best regards,
Eus
--- On Sat, 6/28/08, Eus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ho!
>
> --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Mojmir Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > *sigh*, i do not like to l
to hear that!
> thanks for kicking me in the right direction! although i am
> quite
> ashamed that i had to take your time, i could find this
> myself, sorry
> for that :)
That's okay. We are here to help each other :)
> many thanks again,
Your welcome.
> mojmir
Best regards,
Eus
d
--enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-checking --with-gnu-ld
--verbose --target=i486-slackware-linux --host=i486-slackware-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.6
Best regards,
Eus
he interesting part on the latest release of the NEWS on the
CVS but to no avail.
Thank you for your help.
> Dennis
Best regards,
Eus
ding x86-x-MIPS Compiler
2. Building native-MIPS Compiler with the previously built x86-x-MIPS Compiler
> Ian
Best regards,
Eus
Hi Ho!
--- On Fri, 9/19/08, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> In this case the end result is an x86-build
> native-MIPS compiler.
> >> This requires first building an x86-x-MIPS
> copmiler. Of cour
13 matches
Mail list logo
