On 7/9/20 12:13 PM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
On July 9, 2020 3:43:19 PM GMT+02:00, David Edelsohn via Gcc
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM Matthias Klose wrote:
On 7/9/20 1:58 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose
wrote:
https://gcc.gnu
On 7/13/20 7:08 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Bill Schmidt via Gcc:
Matthias, if you want to post a patch for GCC 9 and GCC 10, I'm sure
that would be accepted (though I do not have the power to pre-approve
it). Or I can put it on my list for later in the summer when my life
settles down.
On 8/10/20 3:30 AM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
Hi Matt,
The best thing to do here is file a bug report with the code to reproduce it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Thanks
Also, be sure to follow the instructions at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/.
Bill
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 at 23:01, Soul Stu
Hi! I'm working on a project where it's desirable to generate a
target-specific header
file while building GCC, and install it with the rest of the target-specific
headers
(i.e., in lib/gcc//11.0.0/include). Today it appears that only those
headers
listed in "extra_headers" in config.gcc will
Thanks for the pointer! I'll have a look at this.
Much obliged,
Bill
On 11/12/20 9:54 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 15:39, Bill Schmidt via Gcc wrote:
Hi! I'm working on a project where it's desirable to generate a
target-specific header
file while bu
On 11/12/20 10:06 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Bill Schmidt via Gcc wrote:
Hi! I'm working on a project where it's desirable to generate a
target-specific header file while building GCC, and install it with
the rest of the target-specific headers (i.e., in
lib/g
On 11/12/20 10:15 AM, Bill Schmidt via Gcc wrote:
On 11/12/20 10:06 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Does the i386 mm_malloc.h file match your scenario?
Ah, that looks promising indeed, and perhaps very simple! Marc,
thanks for the pointer!
And indeed, with this example it was a two-line change
Hi! I'm attempting to do something that may not have been done before,
so I'm looking for advice, or a pointer to where, in fact, it has been
done before. :)
I'm automatically generating a back-end header file that declares some
structures that include trees, and a bunch of global variables t
Actually, the "./filename" syntax works fine. I was missing a
dependency in my t-rs6000 to make the header file appear available.
Sorry for the noise!
Bill
On 1/4/21 11:40 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote:
Hi! I'm attempting to do something that may not have been done before,
so I'm looking for advice
On 1/4/21 1:36 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 1/4/21 10:40 AM, Bill Schmidt via Gcc wrote:
Hi! I'm attempting to do something that may not have been done
before, so I'm looking for advice, or a pointer to where, in fact, it
has been done before. :)
I'm automatically generating a
On 4/20/21 7:42 AM, Richard Kenner via Gcc wrote:
Troubling indeed, but this might just be an overzealous manager.
IBM, like other corporations, has made significant technical
contributions to GCC over the years, for example the scheduler and
the vectorizer, and thus has assigned the copyright of
On 8/30/21 8:04 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
There has been a discussion, both off-list and on the gcc-help mailing
list (“Why vectorization didn't turn on by -O2”, spread across several
months), about enabling the auto-vectorizer at -O2, similar to what
Clang does.
I think the review concluded tha
On 10/5/21 12:43 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 07:24:31PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> Some current Power GCC targets support neither. Some support only
>>> double-double. Making IEEE QP float work on th
Thanks, Jakub, for starting this discussion, and to everyone who weighed in.
The conversation
went in a number of different directions, so I'd like to summarize my
understanding of points
where I think there was agreement. I'd also like to separate out short-term
considerations
for powerpc64le
Would starting from Advance Toolchain 15 with the most recent glibc make things
easier for Thomas to test?
Thanks,
Bill
On 10/29/21 4:06 PM, Michael Meissner via Gcc wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 09:07:38PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I tried this out on the one POWER mac
Hi!
On 12/3/21 5:56 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
>> Note, we want to test both building gcc on ppc64le with older glibc
>> and newer glibc (and that libgfortran will have the same ABI between both
>> and one can move gcc including libgfortran and libquadmath from the older
>> glibc set
16 matches
Mail list logo
