On 8/30/21 8:04 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
There has been a discussion, both off-list and on the gcc-help mailing
list (“Why vectorization didn't turn on by -O2”, spread across several
months), about enabling the auto-vectorizer at -O2, similar to what
Clang does.

I think the review concluded that the very cheap cost model should be
used for that.

Are there any remaining blockers?

Hi Florian,

I don't think I'd characterize it as having blockers, but we are continuing to investigate small performance issues that arise with very-cheap, including some things that regressed in GCC 12.  Kewen Lin is leading that effort.  Kewen, do you feel we have any major remaining concerns with this plan?

Thanks,
Bill


Thanks,
Florian

Reply via email to