the branches. It was probably caused by entries
in the reflog, which I have now disabled.
As an additional bonus, I've added refs for all the current branches tom
make them visible in gitweb and easier to clone.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs -
El Wed, 18-11-2009 a las 07:13 -0800, H.J. Lu escribió:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > I repacked our (un)official git mirror (http://gcc.gnu.org/git) with
> >
> > git repack -a -d -f --window=100 --depth=100 --window-memory=2g
> >
>
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:38 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> If nested subdirs in banches/ aren't handled properly, shouldn't we
> avoid putting them in git mirror?
You're right. I killed the bogus branches and asked the git folks for
advice.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://cod
*:refs/remotes/tags/ubuntu/*
> fetch = tags/ubuntu:refs/remotes/tags/dirs/ubuntu
> tags = tags/*:refs/remotes/tags/*
> fetch = tags:refs/remotes/tags/dirs/root
> fetch = :refs/remotes/dirs/root
Amazing. And how well does this monster config work? Would you recommend
doing the same with our public git mirror?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
otes/ibm/gcc-4_4-branch
c0fab205b6b1e9bd16f72349cc26e4ebe0e10b09: command returned error: 128
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
urceware still running git 1.5
doesn't help (git-svn was greatly improved in git 1.6).
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
er that before
> switching.
Indeed. I could build git locally in my account, but I'd rather have a
sourceware admin update git system-wise.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
On 06/07/09 13:38, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 06/07/09 12:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> Is this mirror an independent conversion from the infradead one (i.e., I
>> have to throw away the repo and re-download a full repo? Or can I reuse
>> objects)?
>
> It
On 06/09/09 16:17, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On 06/07/09 12:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> Is this mirror an independent conversion from the infradead one (i.e., I
>>> have to throw away the repo and re-download a full repo? Or can I reuse
&g
en to hamper someone's
productivity for a while. Cheer up! Your temporary suffering is
for the long-term good! :-)
Local to remote branch mapping is one of the least understood design
aspects in git [*], and probably the steepest point of git's steep
learning curve. It is especially
acking with an even larger window and depth of 250 might
squeeze a few more MBs off... Worth a try :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
On 06/11/09 15:18, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 06/11/09 14:03, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> It may be faster for my to rsync it to a 32 core machine, pack it,
>> then rsync it back now that delta compression is threaded.
>> Does it get large enough speedups these days to be wor
p svn branches directly to the
local namespace instead of remotes/ ?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
" and "trunk" as heads?
>
> See "broken" ;)
Yes, but which one should die? Will cloners get confused by a
repository where the master branch is missing?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
anches= line.
Don't we want to mirror all branches? Enumerating them all would be a
lot of work...
Perhaps we could report this missing feature to the git-svn folks and
ask them to fix it for us?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
Can we kill this empty branch from svn?
- Mensaje reenviado
De: Cron Daemon
Para: ber...@infradead.org
Asunto: Cron nice ionice
-n6 /home/bernie/bin/git-update-toolchain.sh
Fecha: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:41:42 +
W: -empty_dir: branches/ibm/power7-meissner
--
// Bernie
elmed by higher priority
things at this time :-(
--
\___/
|___|Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\___\ CTO OLPC Europe - http://www.laptop.org/
ot;hg.gcc.gnu.org"
> and "git.gcc.gnu.org" are the same machines originally).
I have not measured, but we're certainly not talking about
such a relevant amount of load to require multiple dedicated
servers.
--
\___/
|___| Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\___\ CTO OLPC Europe - http://www.laptop.org/
18 matches
Mail list logo
