On 06/09/09 16:17, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On 06/07/09 12:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>> Is this mirror an independent conversion from the infradead one (i.e., I
>>> have to throw away the repo and re-download a full repo?  Or can I reuse
>>> objects)?  
>>
>> It's an independent mirror, and I wouldn't recommend switching to it yet.
>>
>> There are permissions problems, and I might end up rsyncing the whole
>> infradead repository rather than fixing things locally.
> 
> Please please do *not* rsync the infradead repository.  The repository
> on gcc.gnu.org is set up so that I can switch back and forth between
> pulling from git and using git-svn directly; the infradead repository is
> not.
>
> For one thing, the infradead repository uses svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc,
> which makes it impossible to use git-svn to check in changes; the
> gcc.gnu.org git repository uses svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc, as is
> right and proper.  Also the remotes are in a different place from where
> git-svn puts them, though I suppose that's easy enough to adjust when
> fetching.

I won't re-create the repository from scratch, then.

Though I would still need an updated version of git to enable lots of
branches and tags without wasting too much hard disk space.

Can a sourceware admin please install (or build) git 1.6.3.x?  If there
are concerns of breaking other things, I could install a local copy in
~/bin.

-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs       - http://sugarlabs.org/

Reply via email to