On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:19 AM Andre Vehreschild wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I don't like the new keyword. Could we do "stdcomp" (for "standard compliant")
> or something like that? When a keyword allows a question mark, I would even
> add
> that, i.e.. like "stdcomp?". Or when we like to go with int
On 2/9/25 10:38, саша савельев wrote:
To whom it may concern
Me and my classmates found strange behaviour of «()» (in C++) on IT lesson, but our teacher couldn’t anwer us why it works in this way. After, we had tryed to find out by ourselfs, but we found nothing. We understood HOW it wo
Hi all,
I don't like the new keyword. Could we do "stdcomp" (for "standard compliant")
or something like that? When a keyword allows a question mark, I would even add
that, i.e.. like "stdcomp?". Or when we like to go with interp then at least
add "std", i.e. "stdinterp". "interp" alone to me is t
Snapshot gcc-15-20250209 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/15-20250209/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 15 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, 00:24 Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Gcc, <
gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> As the GNU compiler make its way through a translation unit, more and
> more classes get declared. So for each translation unit, the compiler
> maintains a list of what types it has seen so far.
>
> Could som
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> Compare a standard gcc build:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837664.html
>
> with this one using checking=all:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-February/837708.html
>
> Other lan
To whom it may concern
Me and my classmates found strange behaviour of «()» (in C++) on IT lesson, but
our teacher couldn’t anwer us why it works in this way. After, we had tryed to
find out by ourselfs, but we found nothing. We understood HOW it works, but not
WHY. Could you explane it fo
Hello world,
looking at a few Fortran bug reports, I found some cases where
it was not clear if the program in question was standard-conforming
or not. I would propose to add a keyword for that, tentatively
called "interp".
Comments? Suggestions for a different name? Should I just go ahead
and
On 2/9/25 1:07 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hello world,
looking at a few Fortran bug reports, I found some cases where
it was not clear if the program in question was standard-conforming
or not. I would propose to add a keyword for that, tentatively
called "interp".
Comments? Suggestions for a di
