Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Hi Gerald, > > The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still > online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC > docs. > e.g. try > https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=%22inline+functio

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > Hi Gerald, > > > > The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still > > online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC > > docs. > > e.g. try

gcc-13-20241115 is now available

2024-11-15 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-13-20241115 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/13-20241115/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 13 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: -Wfloat-equal and comparison to zero

2024-11-15 Thread David Brown via Gcc
On 13/11/2024 22:34, James K. Lowden wrote: On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:04:59 +0100 David Brown via Gcc wrote: No. This is - or at least appears to be - missing critical thinking. You are explaining this to someone who designed research databases and who implemented quantitative models that ran

We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
Hi Gerald, The HTML pages from Martin Liska's Sphinx doc experiment are still online, and Google thinks they are the canonical locatiosn for GCC docs. e.g. try https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=%22inline+function+is+as+fast+as+a+macro%22++gcc The only hit from gcc.gnu.org is a s

RE: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Tamar Christina via Gcc
> -Original Message- > From: Gcc On Behalf Of > Jonathan Wakely via Gcc > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 12:25 PM > To: Gerald Pfeifer > Cc: gcc Mailing List > Subject: Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Fri,

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2024-11-15 at 12:14 +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > On IRC mjw suggested that you (Gerald) might object to breaking links > by just removing them. I think the pages are already broken (the links > in the sidebar are half missing already). > > If we think preserving those links

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > All these directories should have been removed two years ago: Agreed. Thank you for digging into this and raising it, Jonathan! > $ ls -1 -d htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/*/ > htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/c-implementation-defined-behavior/ > htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/ex

Re: We need to remove the Sphinx HTML docs

2024-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 12:42, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > All these directories should have been removed two years ago: > > Agreed. Thank you for digging into this and raising it, Jonathan! > > > $ ls -1 -d htdocs/onlinedocs/gcc/*/ > > htdocs/onlinedoc

Re: ☠ Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed compile (failure) (master)

2024-11-15 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 7:21 PM builder--- via Gcc-testresults wrote: > > A new failure has been detected on builder gcc-fedora-arm64 while building > gcc. > > Full details are available at: > https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/183/builds/8332 Aarch64 build fails now due to -