Thanks, Sam,
Yep, that does seem closely related. The problems mentioned there
look similar enough that it may be possible to resolve an entire class
of these problems in the same area of the code in a single pass. I'll
add some more details there soon.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 06:51, Sam James
Hi,
I was investigating an ICE (in our yet to be upstreamed back-end which
has native support for float16), on "gcc.dg/torture/float16-complex.c"
when compiled with lto:
./gcc/build/gcc/xgcc -B./gcc/build/gcc/
./gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/float16-complex.c \
-O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 07:38:44PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2023, at 2:52 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:39:34PM -0500, Paul Koning via Gcc wrote:
> > Before reload it did not have operands[0] and operands[1] the same,
> > already?
>
> No, and gi
> Am 12.01.2023 um 17:18 schrieb Paul Iannetta via Gcc :
>
> Hi,
>
> I was investigating an ICE (in our yet to be upstreamed back-end which
> has native support for float16), on "gcc.dg/torture/float16-complex.c"
> when compiled with lto:
>
> ./gcc/build/gcc/xgcc -B./gcc/build/gcc/
> ./gcc/
Jeff Law via Gcc writes:
> On 1/3/23 04:16, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
>> It seems that the default constructor of the non-POD poly-ints does
>> nothing. Is this intentional? I expected zero initialization, to match
>> regular ints.
> I think it was intentional. Richard Sandiford would know
Snapshot gcc-10-20230112 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20230112/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 5:35 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 12.01.2023 um 17:18 schrieb Paul Iannetta via Gcc :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was investigating an ICE (in our yet to be upstreamed back-end which
> > has native support for float16), on "gcc.dg/torture/float16-complex.c"
> > when com