Jeff Law via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > On 1/3/23 04:16, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: >> It seems that the default constructor of the non-POD poly-ints does >> nothing. Is this intentional? I expected zero initialization, to match >> regular ints. > I think it was intentional. Richard Sandiford would know for sure. But > Martin Sebor might know as well since I think they discussed it at > length a little while back.
Yeah, it was intentional, to try to get -Wunitialized warnings. But it predates C++11 being required, so = default would probably be a better choice now. Thanks, Richard
