On 6/22/21 8:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/22/21 3:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
There's a patch candidate that comes up with a wrapper for 'git commit-mklog'
alias.
Using my patch, one can do:
$ git commit-mklog -a -b 12345,
Thoughts?
Looks good to me.
Cool, I've just pushed
Cool, thanks! I think I understand now.
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 23:58, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am having some trouble understanding the semantics of OBJ_TYPE_REF.
> > I understand that it is made of three operands:
> >
> >
Hello,
I know that some BUILT_IN functions are treated in a special way by
the points-to analysis. Those functions are those that take pointers
as arguments or return them but do not change their points-to set and
similar cases. (E.g. strcpy returns a pointer to the same object as
their first argu
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 23 2021, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that some BUILT_IN functions are treated in a special way by
> the points-to analysis. Those functions are those that take pointers
> as arguments or return them but do not change their points-to set and
> similar cases. (E.g.
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 23 2021, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I know that some BUILT_IN functions are treated in a special way by
> > the points-to analysis. Those functions are those that take pointers
> > as arguments or return them but d
在 6/23/21 6:32 PM, Erick Ochoa via Gcc 写道:
I notice that in these special cases, the printf function is nowhere
to be found, and if one prints a pointer using printf the pointer
points to escaped memory.
Why is this the case?
I think it is due to the incapability of ruling out the possibilit
> I guess that to assume otherwise, one would have to make sure the
> pointer does not correspond to a "%n" (or similar, perhaps even future)
> conversion specifier.
>
Oh, wow, I didn't know about the %n specifier.
Thanks Martin!
Hi Liu,
thanks, this also seems correct. I originally thought that (in your
example) ptr would be marked as pointing to { ESCAPE NONLOCAL } and
that would be enough to hinder some optimizations that might influence
variable value. Therefore, it wasn't necessary to mark "value" as
pointing to { ESC
Hello.
I've just made a first version of the patchset that sits in GCC source tree:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;a=log;h=refs/users/marxin/heads/sphinx-v2
Changes since the last submission:
1) I made a brief proofreading and fixed most of the formatting and other issues
2) target
On 5/21/21 10:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/20/21 5:55 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Quick solution is to also modify partitioner to use the local symbol
names when doing incremental linking (those mixing in source code and
random seeds) to avoid clashes.
Good hint. I added hash based on object fil
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Martin Liška wrote:
> @Joseph: Can you share your thoughts about the used Makefile integration? What
> do you suggest for 2)
> (note that explicit listing of all .rst file would be crazy)?
You can write dependencies on e.g. doc/gcc/*.rst (which might be more
files than actua
Hi all,
Once again we have been unable to hold GNU Tools Cauldron this year
due to COVID-19. We plan to be back in 2022!
In the meantime, our friends at the Linux Plumbers Conference have again
provided a GNU Tools track at their 2021 virtual conference 20-24 September.
The scope is the same as
12 matches
Mail list logo