Re: GCC documentation: porting to Sphinx

On 6/1/21 3:31 PM, Michael Matz wrote: Hello, On Tue, 1 Jun 2021, Martin Liška wrote: On 5/31/21 5:49 PM, Michael Matz wrote: Hello Martin, On Mon, 31 May 2021, Martin Liška wrote: I've made quite some progress with the porting of the documentation and I would like to present it to the com

New vendor branch for RISC-V: integration and experimental branch

Hi all: I am Kito Cheng, one of the RISC-V port maintainers. I would like to announce we have created two vendor branches for accepting unratified extension support, in order to focus the development energy on FSF repo. RISC-V is an open standard instruction set architecture, many ISA extensions

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 11:05:24AM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote: > > > What about the parts of GCC with FSF copyrights that are not covered by > > > the GPL, but the GPL with exceptions? How is it possible to move code > > > between the parts if a contributor previously used DCO and thus gave > > >

Does bootstrap make native compiler faster? Should I always use --disable-boostrap?

The document said yes. However, what does bootstrap actually do that can make compiler faster? Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

Hi Thomas, On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > On 2021-06-01 07:28, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > If we no longer want the FSF to be the legal guardian and copyright > > holder for GCC could we please find another legal entity that performs > > that role and helps us as a

[RISCV] RISC-V GNU Toolchain Biweekly Sync-up call (June 3, 2021)

Hi all, There is an agenda for tomorrow's meeting. If you have topics to discuss or share, please let me know and I can add them to the agenda. ## Agenda: 1 [RFC] Relax the canonical order checking of arch string for -march option https://github.com/riscv/riscv-toolchain-conventions/issues/1

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 4:10 AM Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 11:05:24AM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote: > > > > What about the parts of GCC with FSF copyrights that are not covered > by > > > > the GPL, but the GPL with exceptions? How is it possible to move > code > > > > between

Mailing list reconfiguration: VERP Sender: header affected

Hi - I made an experimental configuration change on sourceware/gcc.gnu.org yesterday that had unforeseen effects on some mailing list subscribers. We turned on VERP (variable envelope return paths) on outgoing mail from mailman, in order to assist tracking mail delivery problems. This changes th

Re: Does bootstrap make native compiler faster? Should I always use --disable-boostrap?

Hi, On Wed, Jun 02 2021, sotrdg sotrdg via Gcc wrote: > The document said yes. However, what does bootstrap actually do that can make > compiler faster? Assuming the gcc you are bootstrapping is newer than your system compiler, it is quite likely to be better able to optimize itself than the old

Re: Does bootstrap make native compiler faster? Should I always use --disable-boostrap?

On 6/2/21 10:10 AM, sotrdg sotrdg via Gcc wrote: The document said yes. However, what does bootstrap actually do that can make compiler faster? Hello. In case of openSUSE, we leverage both bootstrap-lto config with 'make profiledbootstrap'. That utilizes profile-guided optimization. Moreover

Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2021 at 2:36 AM > From: "Jason Merrill via Gcc" > To: "Mark Wielaard" > Cc: "Florian Weimer" , "gcc Mailing List" > > Subject: Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 4:10 AM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 11:05:24

Re: GCC documentation: porting to Sphinx

For RTEMS, we switched from texinfo to Sphinx and the dependency on Python3 for Sphinx has caused a bit of hassle. Is this going to be an issue for GCC? Also we rely on TexLive for PDF output and that's a bit of a pain to install. Tex was incorrectly packaged on some RHEL/CentOS versions. This ig

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 4:18 AM Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > On 2021-06-01 07:28, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > If we no longer want the FSF to be the legal guardian and copyright > > > holder for GCC could we please find an

Re: GCC documentation: porting to Sphinx

On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, Joel Sherrill wrote: > For RTEMS, we switched from texinfo to Sphinx and the dependency > on Python3 for Sphinx has caused a bit of hassle. Is this going to be > an issue for GCC? What Sphinx (and, thus, Python) versions does the GCC manual build work with? Can it work with

Re: GCC documentation: porting to Sphinx

On Mon, 31 May 2021, Martin Liška wrote: > https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/ Looking at some examples there: https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/gcc/_build/html/c-implementation-defined-behavior/preprocessing-directives.html has some conversion problems: * "See Implementation-defined behavio

Re: GCC documentation: porting to Sphinx

On 5/31/21 7:25 AM, Martin Liška wrote: Hello. I've made quite some progress with the porting of the documentation and I would like to present it to the community now: https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/ Just a few issues I noticed in the warnings section: The headings of some warnings mentio