On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 4:18 AM Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > On 2021-06-01 07:28, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > If we no longer want the FSF to be the legal guardian and copyright > > > holder for GCC could we please find another legal entity that performs > > > that role and helps us as a project with copyleft compliance? > > > > Personally, this would have been my preference. > > > > > I would be happy to setup a shared copyright pool under the Conservancy > > > Copyleft Compliance project for example: > > > https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/ > > It isn't too late to start discussing this as alternative. As far as I > understand the SC hasn't talked to the Conservancy yet. But the > Conservancy is happy to share their knowledge and discuss policy > issues with the GCC community if we decide we want their input. >
This seems to me a complement rather than an alternative; some Linux developers use the Conservancy copyleft services while contributing under the DCO, and some GCC developers could do the same. Jason
