41;344;0cOn Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 07:30:13PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella via Gcc
wrote:
And there was no hate (at least not from my side) only *disappointment*
that you used your status to do it even though most of senior developers and
maintainers said explicitly you shouldn’t do it.
I
Hi Alexandre and Jonathan,
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:49:54 -0300 Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote:
> > - RMS ensures GCC stays honest (implying the rest of us can't be
> > trusted or don't *really* believe in FOSS, I don't think it's true
> > and don't see this as an advantage)
>
> Trust is not rati
On 4/12/21 12:55 PM, John Darrington wrote:
In GNU, there are no "senior" (or junior) developers/maintainers. Maintainers
have some specific responsibilities, with which developers are not emcumbered.
In almost all projects, the maintainers are also developers, but this need not
be the case. Bu
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 7:22 PM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, 16:56 David Brown, wrote:
>
> >
> > The big problem with a fork, rather than an amiable split (where FSF/GNU
> > accepts that gcc wants to be a separate project) is the name. If the
> > FSF keep their own "gcc
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 03:12, Chris Punches via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been reading quietly on how the GCC SC handles this and generally
> only lurk here so that I can stay informed on GCC changes. I am nobody
> you would probably care about, but, maybe I will be one day. No one
> ever re
On 12.04.21 11:32, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
Please concentrate on the important things, we're supposed to get a
release of GCC 11 out of the door.
Amen.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 11:24, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 03:12, Chris Punches via Gcc
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been reading quietly on how the GCC SC handles this and generally
>> only lurk here so that I can stay informed on GCC changes. I am nobody
>> you would prob
David Brown writes:
> > So why /do/ people use it? I suspect that one of the biggest reason is
> > "it's the only compiler that will do the job". For a lot of important
> > software, such as Linux kernel, it is gcc or nothing. Another big
> > reason is that gcc comes with their system, which is
> For developers, I think the GPL matters very much. It introduces
> fairness in the contribution process - companies and individuals
> can contribute code knowing that it can't be taken away and locked
> up, to be modified, sold and distributed as binary packages
> (eg. Nvidia).
Note that this di
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 17:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:14 AM David Malcolm
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 21:18 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM David Malcolm
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 01:59 +0530, Salo
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 03:13, Chris Punches via Gcc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been reading quietly on how the GCC SC handles this and generally
> only lurk here so that I can stay informed on GCC changes. I am nobody
> you would probably care about, but, maybe I will be one day. No one
> ever re
On Apr 12, 2021, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> No, you are insinuating that the glibc community both as maintainer
> and contributors acted in a hateful way regarding the 'joke'
> removal. Sorry, but this is not true;
Easy to say for someone who hasn't been the target of hate, but it's
just that i
On 12/04/2021 14:52, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2021, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>> No, you are insinuating that the glibc community both as maintainer
>> and contributors acted in a hateful way regarding the 'joke'
>> removal. Sorry, but this is not true;
>
> Easy to say for someon
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:35 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 17:06 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:14 AM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 21:18 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 8:19 AM David Malcolm
> > > >
On 4/11/21 9:34 PM, Chris Punches via Gcc wrote:
It is not appropriate to discuss the removal of someone based on
innuendo, provenly false smearing, and other types of political
maneuvering at the behest of corporations desiring the destruction of
the very projects they are sponsoring.
Good jo
On 4/12/21 5:32 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
Please concentrate on the important things, we're supposed to get a
release of GCC 11 out of the door.
Then it is important this is resolved.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
That will never make it appropriate.
I would encourage you to reflect more carefully on the meaning of the
words you are reading and using.
These arguments are paper thin, and full of lofty rhetoric; none of
them will expand the expectation of anyone here to include integrating
their poltical bel
"but muh freedum license re"
"haha quality compiler suite go brrr"
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021, 8:25 PM Chris Punches via Gcc wrote:
> That will never make it appropriate.
>
> I would encourage you to reflect more carefully on the meaning of the
> words you are reading and using.
>
> These argumen
Hello everyone.
I'll work on improving diagnostic messages for GCC's Rust front-end in Google
Summer of Code. Here is the proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZPRKu-PKPdZVOAZyYRq7YfSfA0eo7wyX3IL9KJoULnA/edit?usp=sharing
Feel free to leave any comments or suggestions here.
Ruihan Li
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:24 PM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> On 4/12/21 5:32 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
> >
> > Please concentrate on the important things, we're supposed to get a
> > release of GCC 11 out of the door.
>
> Then it is important this is resolved.
Maybe - but it is very appar
20 matches
Mail list logo
