"but muh freedum license reeeee" "haha quality compiler suite go brrr"
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021, 8:25 PM Chris Punches via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > That will never make it appropriate. > > I would encourage you to reflect more carefully on the meaning of the > words you are reading and using. > > These arguments are paper thin, and full of lofty rhetoric; none of > them will expand the expectation of anyone here to include integrating > their poltical beliefs into the GCC project roadmap beyond its > technical and licensing goals. > > I would encourage anyone reading this to start treating this discussion > as off-topic disruption for the GCC SC. > > -C > > On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:22 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > On 4/11/21 9:34 PM, Chris Punches via Gcc wrote: > > > > > It is not appropriate to discuss the removal of someone based on > > > innuendo, provenly false smearing, and other types of political > > > maneuvering at the behest of corporations desiring the destruction > > > of > > > the very projects they are sponsoring. > > > > Good job that's not what is happening then. > > > > > It is not appropriate to even suggest to blackmail sponsor or non- > > > sponsor organizations by cutting ties with them to force someone > > > that a > > > couple corporates in your group don't like out of their > > > organization. > > > I call on those of you who argued this to restore credibility and > > > integrity to this discussion. > > > > People, and companies can chose to support whatever organizations > > they desire, > > and they can chose to withdraw such support. For what ever reasons > > they may have. > > > > nathan > > > > > >
