Status
==
GCC trunk which is to become GCC 11 is in regression and documentation
fixes only mode. We're nearing the date planned for branching and
releasing GCC 11 but as usual the goal is to have zero release blockers
(aka P1 priority regressions) before doing so.
Please help in addressin
On 09/04/2021 08:37, John Darrington wrote:
>
> Nobody is suggesting that RMS should be regarded by everyone or indeed
> anyone as "mein Führer". I think he would be very much concerned if anyone
> tried to confer a cult hero status on him.
>
> Sooner or later, if for no reason other than his a
Gabriel Ravier via Gcc writes:
> RMS is not indispensible because he does not contribute to GCC and
> doesn't bring much to it, and otherwise takes more away from it. If
> you were to remove all of Ian, Jonathan, Joseph and Nathan you would
> be removing ~13% of active contribution to GCC (counti
Hello, everyone.
I'd like to contribute to the gccrs project (https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs)
and they require contributions to have copyright assignment in place. Could you
please tell me what I should do and send me the relevant forms?
Thank you in advance.
Ruihan Li
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 at 6:37 PM
> From: "John Darrington"
> To: "David Malcolm"
> Cc: g...@gnu.org, "Alfred M. Szmidt" , "Mark Wielaard"
>
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 09:35:23PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > RMS was the fi
> On Apr 9, 2021, at 2:27 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt via Gcc wrote:
>
> These discussions are slightly off topic for gcc@, I'd suggest they
> are moved to gnu-misc-discuss@ or some other more suitable list.
More than "slightly", in my view. I'm close to putting this thread into my
"send straight
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 06 2021, Erick Ochoa wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 26 2021, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
>> > I already have some experience developing SIMPLE_IPA_PASSes, but I am
>> > looking to understand IPA_PASSes better. I have made a hello world ipa
>> > pass that stores "hello world $FUNCTION_NAME" i
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 07:30, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> These discussions are slightly off topic for gcc@, I'd suggest they
> are moved to gnu-misc-discuss@ or some other more suitable list.
That list is precisely the toxic cesspit that makes me want to have
nothing more to do with GNU, ever.
My
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 at 10:37 PM
> From: "David Brown"
> To: "John Darrington" , "David Malcolm"
>
> Cc: g...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> On 09/04/2021 08:37, John Darrington wrote:
>
> >
> > Nobody is suggesting that RMS should be regarded by everyone or
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 at 11:48 PM
> From: "Pankaj Jangid"
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> Gabriel Ravier via Gcc writes:
>
> > RMS is not indispensible because he does not contribute to GCC and
> > doesn't bring much to it, and otherwise takes mor
I have sent my proposal to GSoC about improving the warnings of Rust-GCC
Frontend and more specifically the warnings that are connected with
immutable values .
You can see my full proposal here :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/146zKtk6rEbZV7c5Fomt8VomjG8AnzQ4aULHhnM8hh6M/edit?usp=sharing
Geo
Replied privately.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 8:37 AM Ruihan Li via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello, everyone.
>
>
>
>
> I'd like to contribute to the gccrs project
> (https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs) and they require contributions to have
> copyright assignment in place. Could you please tell me what I sho
On 4/9/21 1:48 PM, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
Gabriel Ravier via Gcc writes:
RMS is not indispensible because he does not contribute to GCC and
doesn't bring much to it, and otherwise takes more away from it. If
you were to remove all of Ian, Jonathan, Joseph and Nathan you would
be removing ~13% of
On 09/04/2021 16:40, Christopher Dimech wrote:
>> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 at 10:37 PM
>> From: "David Brown"
>> To: "John Darrington" , "David Malcolm"
>>
>> Cc: g...@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>>
>> On 09/04/2021 08:37, John Darrington wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Nobody is
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 5:01 AM
> From: "David Brown"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: "John Darrington" , "David Malcolm"
> , g...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> On 09/04/2021 16:40, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> >> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2021 at 10:37 PM
>
Things will still remain good for RMS by those willing to help him. I use
free software every day and will be a long time before Richard exhausts his
entitlement to help from me!!!
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 5:01 AM
> From: "David Brown"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: "John Darringto
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:01:07PM +0200, David Brown wrote:
Different opinions are fine. Bringing national or international
politics into the discussion (presumably meant to be as an insult) is
not fine. This is not a political discussion - please stop trying to
make it
On 2021-04-09 11:02, Christopher Dimech via Gcc wrote:
[... snip ...]
We (the free software world) does not need a person with the qualities
of RMS any more - that is the point. There should not be such a
position as "Chief GNUsance".
Secondly, I cannot clearly see what status you have for ma
Hi John,
On April 9, 2021 6:36:31 PM UTC, John Darrington
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:01:07PM +0200, David Brown wrote:
>
> Different opinions are fine. Bringing national or international
> politics into the discussion (presumably meant to be as an insult) is
> not fine. T
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 7:37 AM
> From: "Thomas Rodgers"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: "David Brown" , g...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> On 2021-04-09 11:02, Christopher Dimech via Gcc wrote:
>
> [... snip ...]
>
> >> We (the free software world) does not
On 2021-04-09 14:02, Christopher Dimech wrote:
But you seem too ignorant to introspect the likelihood that I could in
effect have
many valuable things to say.
On the contrary, I eagerly await each and every one of your missives on
this topic, hoping for exactly that very
thing to occur.
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 9:17 AM
> From: "Thomas Rodgers"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: "David Brown" , g...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> On 2021-04-09 14:02, Christopher Dimech wrote:
>
> > But you seem too ignorant to introspect the likelihood that I c
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021, 1:04 PM Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On April 9, 2021 6:36:31 PM UTC, John Darrington <
> j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:01:07PM +0200, David Brown wrote:
> >
> > Different opinions are fine. Bringing national or international
Just for the record, I was not talking about developers but about the
leadership of the project, Ian.
8 out of 13 members of the Steering Committee are from US-corporations.
This is a fact.
Just like the weird relations some of these companies have had with US
Government:
https://www.virtualt
Snapshot gcc-9-20210409 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20210409/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, 23:22 Giacomo Tesio, wrote:
> Just for the record, I was not talking about developers but about the
> leadership of the project, Ian.
>
> 8 out of 13 members of the Steering Committee are from US-corporations.
>
> This is a fact.
>
>
> Just like the weird relations some of the
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 10:12 AM
> From: "Giacomo Tesio"
> To: "Ian Lance Taylor"
> Cc: "GCC Development" , g...@gnu.org, "David Brown"
>
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> Just for the record, I was not talking about developers but about the
> leadership of the proj
> Just for the record, I was not talking about developers but about
> the leadership of the project, Ian.
>
> 8 out of 13 members of the Steering Committee are from US-corporations.
I don't think I'd consider the Steering Committee "the leadership of
the project". In what sense do they "lead" th
在 2021/4/9 下午11:06, David Edelsohn via Gcc 写道:
Replied privately.
Excuse me, but why this has to be done privately? I generally expect there to be such a form that
people may download, fill and submit without public acknowledgements.
Please forgive me if I am being too curious.
--
Best re
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 2:53 PM
> From: "Liu Hao"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: g...@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF
>
> 在 2021/4/10 上午2:02, Christopher Dimech via Gcc 写道:
> >
> > It is an assessment of what you propose. The removal of people from all
> > posi
在 2021/4/10 上午2:02, Christopher Dimech via Gcc 写道:
It is an assessment of what you propose. The removal of people from all
positions is a political statements. I have no problem with political
discussions and certainly don't take instructions from you, to say the
least! What you talk about is
Hi! My name is Carlos Barbosa, and I would like to participate in this
year's GSoC with GCC.
I'm a brazilian undergraduate student and I've been passionate about free
software ever since I first heard of it. I'm most interested in OS level
programming, language development, optimization and, of cou
Hi! My name is Carlos Barbosa, and I would like to participate in this
year's GSoC with GCC.
I'm a brazilian undergraduate student and I've been passionate about free
software ever since I first heard of it. I'm most interested in OS level
programming, language development, optimization and, of cou
33 matches
Mail list logo
