Giacomo Tesio writes:
> Hi David, thanks for sharing!
>
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:27:29 -0400 David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
>
>> In 2012 RMS was added to the GCC Steering Committee web page
>> based on his role in the GNU Project [...]
>> we are removing him from the page.
>
> I have to admit that
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, 01:05 Giacomo Tesio, wrote:
>
> People all over the world, whatever their country, should be sure to be
> treated fairly and equally by the GCC leaders even if they want to
> contribute something that does not match the culture or interests you
> represent.
>
Everybody is we
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 10:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, 01:05 Giacomo Tesio, wrote:
>>
>>
>> People all over the world, whatever their country, should be sure to be
>> treated fairly and equally by the GCC leaders even if they want to
>> contribute something that does not m
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021, SAIFI wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021, Gabriele Serra wrote:
I have written a very basic article on GCC Plugins (how to build a plugin
from the ground, some info on APIs, and how to instrument code). The
material is based on GCC 9. The code is fully documented and working.
The GCC 10 branch is now frozen in preparation for the GCC 10.3 release
which will see a first release candidate built soon.
All changes from now on require release manager approval.
Hello,
just trying one more time. Any direction or hint is appreciated. Just
as a note, I looked at the ipa-devirt as an inspiration for these
small functions I wrote, but for some reason I can't read what I
assume have written to the summaries. (What I'm trying to do is simply
use LTO using a rea
Status
==
The GCC 10 branch is frozen for the release of GCC 10.3 with
a first release candidate published. All changes require
release manager approval.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from last report
--- ---
P1
The first release candidate for GCC 10.3 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
892024d4af83b258801ff7484bf28f0cf1a1a999.
I have so
Hi,
just a high level question. I know that IPA-PTA is a SIMPLE_IPA_PASS
and that ideally it would be better as an IPA_PASS. I understand that
one of the biggest challenges of changing IPA-PTA to an IPA_PASS is
that on the current LTO framework, the LTRANS stage can happen at the
same time for mul
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:50 PM Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just a high level question. I know that IPA-PTA is a SIMPLE_IPA_PASS
> and that ideally it would be better as an IPA_PASS. I understand that
> one of the biggest challenges of changing IPA-PTA to an IPA_PASS is
> that on the cur
> The reason this is not done is because the summaries (constraints)
> are huge, the solutions are even larger and the PTA solver doesn't
> scale to large units (so the LTRANS splitting makes it actually usable
> in the first place).
I did not spent that much time working on PTA as Richard, but it
>
> I don't think this would remove any problem that is present.
>
I have a problem understanding what you mean here because later on you state:
> Now - the reason you think of is likely that IPA transform will instantiate
> IPA clones and do inlining and transfering the IPA PTA solution to the
>
> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
> x86_64-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla.
It does not build for Windows:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/567582.html
--
Eric Botcazou
I strongly disagree with the removal of Dr. Stallman from the Steering
Committee.
Not only RMS wrote the GCC initially, but I think he is the best person
by far who can guarantee the values of free software, with unmatched
integrity and lucidity.
That's especially important in the SC, given the
On April 1, 2021 3:52:37 PM GMT+02:00, Erick Ochoa wrote:
>>
>> I don't think this would remove any problem that is present.
>>
>
>I have a problem understanding what you mean here because later on you
>state:
>
>> Now - the reason you think of is likely that IPA transform will
>instantiate
>> IPA
On April 1, 2021 5:23:25 PM GMT+02:00, "Andrea G. Monaco"
wrote:
>
>I strongly disagree with the removal of Dr. Stallman from the Steering
>Committee.
>
>Not only RMS wrote the GCC initially, but I think he is the best person
>by far who can guarantee the values of free software, with unmatched
>
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 17:23 +0200, Andrea G. Monaco wrote:
>
> I strongly disagree with the removal of Dr. Stallman from the
> Steering
> Committee.
RMS was not removed from the GCC Steering Committee; his name was
removed from the *web page* of the steering committee.
Based on the discussion he
On 3/31/21 2:27 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote:
[I previously sent this from another email account, but it seems to be
lost. I am sending this on behalf of the GCC Steering Committee.]
In 2012 RMS was added to the GCC Steering Committee web page
based on his role in the GNU Project, though hi
On April 1, 2021 4:08:21 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
>> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
>> x86_64-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla.
>
>It does not build for Windows:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/567582.html
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:08 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> You, the SC, have chosen to fix this as a clerical error. The most
> do-nothing response, other than actually doing nothing.
>
> I am profoundly disappointed that you have not even acknowledged the
> harm RMS has caused. Using passive voi
Richard Biener wrote:
On April 1, 2021 4:08:21 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla.
On x86 Darwin, a lot of new libstdc++ experimental/filesystem fails.
https://gc
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On April 1, 2021 4:08:21 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
> > wrote:
> >>> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
> >>> x86_64-linux. Please test it and report any issues to bugzilla.
>
> On x86 Da
On April 1, 2021 9:49:19 PM GMT+02:00, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
wrote:
>On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>> Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> > On April 1, 2021 4:08:21 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
>> > wrote:
>> >>> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
>> >>
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 21:08, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On April 1, 2021 9:49:19 PM GMT+02:00, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >>
> >> Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >> > On April 1, 2021 4:08:21 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc wrote:
> > 2) Last year, I asked for libcody to be added as a subcomponent, with
> > its Apachev2 license intact. AFAICT RMS was involved in that licensing
> > discussion, /for which I never received a response/. He was not at the
> > FSF then, so he
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 08:49:19PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 20:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >
> > Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > On April 1, 2021 4:08:21 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
> > > wrote:
> > >>> I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate
On 4/1/21 10:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
RMS once asked me about the status of fused multiply-add support in glibc.
I don't know why. He wasn't asking for any changes or objecting to
anything the glibc maintainers had done. I'd hope that future Chief
GNUisances won't try to get involved in detai
On 01.04.21 22:33, Joseph Myers wrote:
And while in that case RMS probably learned of modules and libcody through
the SC mailing list, in general he has this habit of asking GNU package
developers random questions related to their packages.
I've been asked a few questions about gfortran by ra
I bootstrap built and tested for powerpc 64 on power 7 and 8 BE and
power 8, 9, and 10 LE and I saw nothing unexpected.
On 4/1/21 7:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 10.3 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
ftp
> If RMS had ever done the same (pretty unlikely, Fortran isnt't his
> thing), I would have done the same without thinking twice about it.
I agree with that sentiment. The fact that somebody has a certain
role doesn't necessarily mean that the question is asked with that hat
on: it may be nothing
Snapshot gcc-8-20210401 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20210401/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Dear GCC development team,
We've been trying to build reproducibly the minimal NixOS image, and
gcc was one of the last issues we had.
We found that disabling profiled bootstrap compilation of GCC allowed
us to get a reproducible build of gcc.
Our efforts can be followed here: https://github.com/N
32 matches
Mail list logo
