On 2/5/20 7:21 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Greetings Martin,
I won't be applied but it was good to see you at least got some possible ideas
out of
my research from the make parts. Two questions as related to GSoC, in terms of
long term planning for my work:
Hello.
1. *Implement something si
On 2/5/20 10:34 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/5/20 7:21 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Greetings Martin,
I won't be applied but it was good to see you at least got some
possible ideas out of
my research from the make parts. Two questions as related to GSoC, in
terms of
long term planning for m
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 01:24:04PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> ANd yes, even though I have been a regular ChangeLog user, I rely more
> and more on the git log these days.
As a reviewer, the changelog is priceless still. We shouldn't drop the
changelog before people write *good* commit messages (and
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Happy to have you as a mirror, and if you'd like to submit a patch
> for https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html that'd be great. Otherwise we
> can create one.
I applied this patch that I created on behalf of Sami.
Gerald
- Log -
When debugging PR analyzer/93288, I'm compiling this test C++ file:
struct a {
a();
};
class foo {
a b;
} c;
I see a cgraph_edge from __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 to
a "__ct_comp ", which I see is a DECL_COMPLETE_CONSTRUCTOR_P.
The "__ct_comp " prints as a "a::a()/2", but its DE
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 23:07 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> When debugging PR analyzer/93288, I'm compiling this test C++ file:
>
> struct a {
> a();
> };
> class foo {
> a b;
> } c;
>
> I see a cgraph_edge from __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 to
> a "__ct_comp ", which I see is a DEC
