A wiki for GNU Project volunteers would provide a central place
for cross-project collaboration, including collaboration between
gcc, glibc, gdb, and binutils.
This is an invitation to discuss having a high-level wiki for
GNU Project volunteers.
The conversation is on gnu-misc-discuss:
https://li
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 11:25 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:51:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor via gcc wrote:
> > I'm seeing compiler crashes building libgcc for powerpc64le-linux-gnu,
> > cross-compiling from x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I'm at SVN revision 279830.
> > I'm see
On 15/12/2019 02:57, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 12:36 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/9/19 8:15 PM, li zi wrote:
Hi All,
We are using gcc in our projects and we found some of the C standard functions
(like memcpy, strcpy) used in gcc may induce security vulnerablities like
b
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 09:43:20AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 11:25 PM Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:51:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor via gcc wrote:
> > > I'm seeing compiler crashes building libgcc for powerpc64le-linux-gnu,
> > > cros
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 1:25 PM David Brown wrote:
>
> On 15/12/2019 02:57, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 12:36 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/9/19 8:15 PM, li zi wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> We are using gcc in our projects and we found some of the C standard
> >>> fun
Snapshot gcc-10-20191215 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20191215/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Concretely: when I did a comparison of the tip of trunk against master
> from a reposurgeon conversion on 29 November, there were 1421 differences
> (files or directories only present in one of SVN or git or with different
> contents). As of today wit
在 2019/12/16 4:00, Jeffrey Walton 写道:
>
> If RTFM was going to work, then it would have happened in the last 50
> years or so.
>
> If error free programming was going to happen, then it would have
> happened in the last 50 years or so.
>
> Come back to reality.
>
What's your point? Don't RTFM
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 9:43 PM Liu Hao wrote:
>
> 在 2019/12/16 4:00, Jeffrey Walton 写道:
> >
> > If RTFM was going to work, then it would have happened in the last 50
> > years or so.
> >
> > If error free programming was going to happen, then it would have
> > happened in the last 50 years or so.
Le 16/12/2019 à 03:43, Liu Hao a écrit :
I generally consider the Glibc folks better trained in C and more
knowledgeable of the C standard then me. If the Glibc folks are making
the mistakes, then there is no hope in practice for folks like me or
those who are just starting in C. There are too ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
