On 07/18/2018 04:29 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.07.2018 14:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 7:15 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 at 13:06, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Jonathan Wakely :
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 at 11:56, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
On 19.07.2018 22:20, Karsten Merker wrote:
> David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 14:49 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's
>>> quite unpleasant to make any adjustments. My question is
>>> simple: can we starting using a scripting la
On 07/19/2018 04:47 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 03:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:51:36AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> We already conditionally require Perl for building for some targets so I
>>> wonder
>>> if using perl would be better ...
>>
>> At leas
On 07/19/2018 10:20 PM, Karsten Merker wrote:
> David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 14:49 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> I've recently touched AWK option generate machinery and it's
>>> quite unpleasant to make any adjustments. My question is
>>> simple: can we starting using a scripting
On 07/18/2018 08:03 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.07.2018 19:29, Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 18, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Boris Kolpackov
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Paul Koning writes:
>>>
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 11:13 AM, Boris Kolpackov
> wrote:
>
> I wonder what will be the expec
GCC Edition:7.3.0
I find in source code/gcc/c/c-decl.c ,
Line 1265 to 1281 decides what situation leads to warnings for unused variables
I am confused about line 1266:
I think only the DECL_READ_P is enough for program to
decides the warning for unused variables, so I can elmiminate
" !TREE_USED(
Hi All ,
We are looking at the C sample i.e
extern int i,j;
int test()
{
while(1)
{ i++;
j=20;
}
return 0;
}
command used :(gcc 8.1.0)
gcc -S test.c -O2
the generated asm for x86
.L2:
jmp .L2
we understand that,the infinite loop is not deterministic ,compiler
is fr
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 05:49:12PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> We are looking at the C sample i.e
>
> extern int i,j;
>
> int test()
> {
> while(1)
> { i++;
> j=20;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> command used :(gcc 8.1.0)
> gcc -S test.c -O2
>
> the generated asm for x86
>
> .L2:
>
On 07/19/18 07:28, Richard Biener wrote:
A release candidate for GCC 8.2 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8.2.0-RC-20180719/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 262876.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-u
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:49:05AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Fully agree with that. Coming up with a new scripts written in python2 really
> makes no sense.
Then python cannot be a build requirement for GCC, since some of our
primary targets do not ship python3.
Segher
> On Jul 20, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:49:05AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Fully agree with that. Coming up with a new scripts written in python2 really
>> makes no sense.
>
> Then python cannot be a build requirement for GCC, since some
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:49:05AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> Fully agree with that. Coming up with a new scripts written in python2
> >> really
> >> m
On 07/20/2018 06:19 AM, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
Hi All ,
We are looking at the C sample i.e
extern int i,j;
int test()
{
while(1)
{ i++;
j=20;
}
return 0;
}
command used :(gcc 8.1.0)
gcc -S test.c -O2
the generated asm for x86
.L2:
jmp .L2
we understand that,the infi
On July 20, 2018 7:59:10 PM GMT+02:00, Martin Sebor wrote:
>On 07/20/2018 06:19 AM, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
>> Hi All ,
>>
>> We are looking at the C sample i.e
>>
>> extern int i,j;
>>
>> int test()
>> {
>> while(1)
>> { i++;
>> j=20;
>> }
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> command used :(gcc 8.1
> From: Segher Boessenkool
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> > >> Fully agree with that. Coming up with a new scripts written in python2
> > >> really
> > >> makes no sense.
> > >
> > > Then python cannot be a build requirement for GCC, since some of our
> > > prima
On 07/20/2018 12:17 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On July 20, 2018 7:59:10 PM GMT+02:00, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/20/2018 06:19 AM, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
Hi All ,
We are looking at the C sample i.e
extern int i,j;
int test()
{
while(1)
{ i++;
j=20;
}
return 0;
}
command used :(gc
On 20.07.2018 20:53, Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
>> From: Segher Boessenkool
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:54:36PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> Fully agree with that. Coming up with a new scripts written in python2
> really
> makes no sense.
Then python cannot be a build requireme
> From: Matthias Klose
> To: Konovalov, Vadim; Segher Boessenkool;
> On 20.07.2018 20:53, Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
> > Sometimes those are not behind, those could have no python for other
> > reasons -
> > maybe those are too forward? They just don't have python yet?
> >
> >>> it is straightforw
As far as I am concerned, the problem with ChangeLogs is one with the
format rather than one with having files called ChangeLog. (The GNU
Coding Standards have permitted automatic generation of ChangeLog at
release time from version control information since 1996.)
The main issues I see with t
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> However, even if you could "git log --grep" the commit messages, I assume your
> current use is grepping for function names and such, right? Being able to grep
> a commit message won't solve that problem, or am I missing something?
If you know what func
* Jeff Law:
> On 07/19/2018 02:19 PM, Carlo Pisani wrote:
>> hi
>> is there any chance someone has a working gcc-ada compiler? for
>> - Linux/MIPS (big endian, MIPS3, MIPS4 or MIPS32)
>> - Linux/HPPA2
>>
>> I have successfully compiled gcc-ada for SGI_IRIX (MIPS4/BE)
>> but ... every attempt to c
I don't see any commits at
git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git since January. Are
there further changes that haven't been pushed there? (For example, I
sent a few additions to the author map on 13 Feb.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Richard Biener :
> > 12 hours from remote I guess? The subversion repository is available
> > through rsync so you can create a local mirror to work from (we've been
> > doing that at suse for years)
>
> I'm saying I see rsync plus local checkout ta
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> > On 07/09/2018 01:57 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >> Jeff Law :
> >>> I'm not aware of any such merges, but any that occurred most likely
> >>> happened after mid-April when the trunk was re-opened for development
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Large-scale, I'm afraid. The context diff is about a GLOC.
>
> I don't see how that's possible. Most of those files are tiny, or
> change very rarely, so I don't see how that large a diff can happen.
Concretely, the *complete GCC source tree* (tru
On Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 14:19:12 CEST Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> Hi All ,
>
> We are looking at the C sample i.e
>
> extern int i,j;
>
> int test()
> {
> while(1)
> { i++;
> j=20;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> command used :(gcc 8.1.0)
> gcc -S test.c -O2
>
> the generated asm for x86
>
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 at 23:06, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>
> On Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 14:19:12 CEST Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> > Hi All ,
> >
> > We are looking at the C sample i.e
> >
> > extern int i,j;
> >
> > int test()
> > {
> > while(1)
> > { i++;
> > j=20;
> > }
> > return 0;
>
On Samstag, 21. Juli 2018 00:21:48 CEST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 at 23:06, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > On Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 14:19:12 CEST Umesh Kalappa wrote:
> > > Hi All ,
> > >
> > > We are looking at the C sample i.e
> > >
> > > extern int i,j;
> > >
> > > int t
Joseph Myers :
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > Richard Biener :
> > > 12 hours from remote I guess? The subversion repository is available
> > > through rsync so you can create a local mirror to work from (we've been
> > > doing that at suse for years)
> >
> > I'm saying I s
Joseph Myers :
> I don't see any commits at
> git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git since January. Are
> there further changes that haven't been pushed there? (For example, I
> sent a few additions to the author map on 13 Feb.)
Yes, that copy is rather stale. I need toi do some an
Joseph Myers :
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> > On Jul 9, 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > > On 07/09/2018 01:57 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > >> Jeff Law :
> > >>> I'm not aware of any such merges, but any that occurred most likely
> > >>> happened after mid-April when the trun
That light at the end of the tunnel turned out to be an oncoming train.
Until recently I thought the conversion was near finished. I'd had
verified clean conversions across trunk and all branches, except for
one screwed-up branch that the management agreed we could discard.
I had some minor issue
32 matches
Mail list logo
