Re: Tom de Vries appointed nvptx maintainer

2017-09-25 Thread Tom de Vries
On 09/22/2017 08:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Tom de Vries as nvptx maintainer. Thank you for your trust. Tom, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file. Committed as attached below. Happy hacking! W

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-25 Thread Martin Liška
Hi Paulo. Thank you for working on that! To be honest, I've been running local buildbot on my desktop machine which does builds your buildbot instance can do (please see: https://pasteboard.co/GLZ0vLMu.png): - doing time to time (once a week) sanitizer builds: ASAN, UBSAN and run test-suite - do

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-25 Thread Paulo Matos
On 25/09/17 11:52, Martin Liška wrote: > Hi Paulo. > > Thank you for working on that! To be honest, I've been running local buildbot > on > my desktop machine which does builds your buildbot instance can do (please > see: > https://pasteboard.co/GLZ0vLMu.png): > Hi Martin, Thanks for sharin

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-25 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 25 September 2017 at 11:13, Paulo Matos wrote: >> Apart from that, I fully agree with octoploid that >> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/ is duplicated effort which is running >> on GCC compile farm machines and uses a shell scripts to utilize. I would >> prefer to integrate it to Buildbot

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-25 Thread Martin Liška
On 09/25/2017 12:13 PM, Paulo Matos wrote: > > > On 25/09/17 11:52, Martin Liška wrote: >> Hi Paulo. >> >> Thank you for working on that! To be honest, I've been running local >> buildbot on >> my desktop machine which does builds your buildbot instance can do (please >> see: >> https://pastebo

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-25 Thread Paulo Matos
On 25/09/17 13:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25 September 2017 at 11:13, Paulo Matos wrote: >>> Apart from that, I fully agree with octoploid that >>> http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/ is duplicated effort which is running >>> on GCC compile farm machines and uses a shell scripts to utiliz

Re: GCC Buildbot

2017-09-25 Thread Paulo Matos
On 25/09/17 13:36, Martin Liška wrote: > > Would be great, what exactly do you want to visualize? For me, even having > green/red spots > works fine in order to quickly identify what builds are wrong. > There are several options and I think mostly it depends on what everyone would like to see

Re: Weird warning when building gcc

2017-09-25 Thread Eric Gallager
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:17 AM, nick wrote: > > > On 2017-09-24 10:10 AM, Eric Gallager wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:34 PM, nick wrote: >>> If your able to just tell me where the functions are located or how do you >>> enable ctags for all of >>> gcc? That would just save me asking stu

Invoice Copy

2017-09-25 Thread David
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - Hi, I sent you an invoice through Adobe PDF. Please acknowledge. Thanks! David Sent from my iPhone Invoice (58).pdf