LCOV of current GCC

2017-04-28 Thread Martin Liška
Hello. I've been working on some patches for GCOV and lcov was of my test scenarios. I'm sending link to static HTML pages made by the tool which are recorded for GCC (w/o bootstrap) build + running test-suite on x86_64-linux-gnu. I'm planning to set up a periodic build of that that will eventuall

Re: LCOV of current GCC

2017-04-28 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Martin Liška wrote: > Hello. > > I've been working on some patches for GCOV and lcov was of my test scenarios. > I'm sending link to static HTML pages made by the tool which are recorded > for GCC (w/o bootstrap) build + running test-suite on x86_64-linux-gnu. > I

Doxygen for GCC

2017-04-28 Thread Martin Liška
Hello. There are couple of pending patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01478.html Using the patches, we can generate following Doxygen 'documentation': https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0pisUJ80pO1dmhldmo3R3JHLWc I'm planning to periodically build it and rsync to a public web

Re: [C++ Patch] Remove is_auto_or_concept, etc (Was: Re: [C++, concepts] Two slightly obscure pt.c functions?)

2017-04-28 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 04/27/2017 02:02 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: ... replying to myself, in practice we could do the below, which certainly passes testing, and in fact now seems to me even more obvious than I thought a couple of days ago... I'm insufficiently conceptified to know whether this is safe (but lack

Second GCC 7.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2017-04-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
The second release candidate for GCC 7.1 is available from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.0.1-RC-20170428 and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 247368. I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it

Re: Ada gcc compiler for ia64-hp-openvms

2017-04-28 Thread David Edelsohn
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:55 AM, David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs Ltd wrote: > > Dear GCC Steering Committee, > > I am David, founder of AdaLabs Ltd, a software engineering startup > having expertise in Ada programming language technologies. As a summary, > we would like to know if gcc has interest in an

Re: LCOV of current GCC

2017-04-28 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/28/2017 03:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Martin Liška wrote: Hello. I've been working on some patches for GCOV and lcov was of my test scenarios. I'm sending link to static HTML pages made by the tool which are recorded for GCC (w/o bootstrap) build + run

Re: LCOV of current GCC

2017-04-28 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 11:38 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Martin Liška > wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I've been working on some patches for GCOV and lcov was of my test > > scenarios. > > I'm sending link to static HTML pages made by the tool which are > > recorded

Re: LCOV of current GCC

2017-04-28 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Jeff Law wrote: > I did some similar work a few years back. Martin's results are comparable to > mine. Interestingly enough the 70-80% coverage we see for GCC is a "sweet > spot" in that several of the ancillary tools I tested were in the same overall > range. My observat

Re: PowerPC SPE maintainership (was Re: Obsolete powerpc*-*-*spe*)

2017-04-28 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi Andrew, On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:18:55AM +0100, Andrew Jenner wrote: > On 13/03/2017 18:01, Andrew Jenner wrote: > >I volunteer to be the point of contact for the SPE port. > > > >Over here at CodeSourcery/Mentor Embedded, we have a strong interest in > >SPE *not* being deprecated (we activel