On 04/28/2017 03:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
Hello.
I've been working on some patches for GCOV and lcov was of my test scenarios.
I'm sending link to static HTML pages made by the tool which are recorded
for GCC (w/o bootstrap) build + running test-suite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
I'm planning to set up a periodic build of that that will eventually rsync
content to a public website:
I guess it can be interesting for instance to see which folding branches are
not used, or which files (functionality) is basically not much tested via
the testsuite.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B0pisUJ80pO1X0s3eEpuQ25GTG8
P.S. I've noticed David fixed doxygen of the project, I can rsync also that
to public website.
Nice! Results look better than anticipated ;)
I did some similar work a few years back. Martin's results are
comparable to mine. Interestingly enough the 70-80% coverage we see
for GCC is a "sweet spot" in that several of the ancillary tools I
tested were in the same overall range.
jeff
